Author Affiliations
1School of Optoelectronic Science and Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China2Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China3Key Laboratory of Advanced Optical Manufacturing Technologies of Jiangsu Province and Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Technologies of Ministry of Education, Suzhou 215006, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Frequency spectrum filtered by the TBGs and the FM-to-AM conversion: (a) and (b) TBG-1, (c) and (d) TBG-2, (e) and (f) TBG-3, (g) and (h) TBG-4.
Fig. 2. Dependence of the distortion criterion on the bandwidth.
Fig. 3. Dependence of the Bragg selectivity on the grating period and thickness: (a) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{0}=1053$ nm, $d=2.5$ mm, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}=90^{\circ }$; (b) $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{0}=1053$ nm, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}=1.5~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}=90^{\circ }$.
Fig. 4. Bragg selectivity for TBG-3, TBG-3-O, TBG-4 and TBG-4-O.
Fig. 5. Frequency spectrum filtered by optimized TBGs and the FM-to-AM conversion: (a) and (b) TBG-3-O, (c) and (d) TBG-4-O.
Fig. 6. Dependence of the distortion criterion on the number of TBGs.
Fig. 7. Schematic diagram demonstrating FM-to-AM conversion on TBGs.
Fig. 8. Fluctuation of the inclined laser pulse.
Fig. 9. Frequency spectra filtered by TBGs and temporal profiles of the laser pulses: (a) and (b) TBG-I, (c) and (d) TBG-II, (e) and (f) TBG-III.
| | | | Cutoff | | |
---|
| Period | Thickness | Modulation | frequency | Bandwidth | DE |
---|
| () | (mm) | () | (mrad) | (nm) | (%) |
---|
TBG-1 | 1.88 | 2.0 | 258 | 0.84 | 4.50 | 100 | TBG-2 | 1.17 | 2.5 | 177 | 0.41 | 1.35 | 100 | TBG-3 | 1.08 | 3.3 | 157 | 0.28 | 0.87 | 100 | TBG-4 | 0.97 | 4.0 | 129 | 0.21 | 0.60 | 100 |
|
Table 1. Structural parameters of TBGs.
| Period | Thickness | Modulation | Bandwidth |
---|
| () | (mm) | () | (nm) |
---|
TBG-3-O | 2.62 | 8.0 | 65 | 2.20 | TBG-4-O | 3.64 | 15.0 | 35 | 2.28 |
|
Table 2. Optimized structural parameters of TBG-3 and TBG-4.
| | | | | Cutoff | |
---|
| Wavelength | Period | Thickness | Bandwidth | frequency | DE |
---|
| (nm) | | (mm) | (nm) | (mrad) | (%) |
---|
TBG-I | 1053 | 3.49 | 3.54 | 8.70 | 1.285 | 96.9 | TBG-II | 1053 | 1.25 | 3.83 | 1.00 | 0.487 | 94.0 | TBG-III | 1053 | 1.10 | 4.09 | 0.75 | 0.376 | 91.0 |
|
Table 3. Structural parameters of the TBGs in the experiment.
| Incident | After TBG-I | After TBG-II | After TBG-III |
---|
| pulse (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) |
---|
Experimental results | 12.8 | 13.6 | 28.4 | 42.5 | Theoretical results | | 13.3 | 26.9 | 39.6 |
|
Table 4. Results of the distortion criterion
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}$.