• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 18, Issue 1, 013102 (2020)
Junxiang Huang1, Tao Fu1, Haiou Li1, Zhaoyu Shou1, and Xi Gao1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Information and Communication, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of THz Technology, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610054, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL202018.013102 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Junxiang Huang, Tao Fu, Haiou Li, Zhaoyu Shou, Xi Gao. A reconfigurable terahertz polarization converter based on metal–graphene hybrid metasurface[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2020, 18(1): 013102 Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) Schematic diagram of the proposed device. (b) Unit cell of the polarizer.
    Fig. 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the proposed device. (b) Unit cell of the polarizer.
    Simulated Ruu, Rvu, and AR for EF=0 eV and N=3. (a) The amplitude (|Ruu| and |Rvu|) and phase difference (Δφ) of the reflection coefficient. (b) The AR of the reflected wave.
    Fig. 2. Simulated Ruu, Rvu, and AR for EF=0eV and N=3. (a) The amplitude (|Ruu| and |Rvu|) and phase difference (Δφ) of the reflection coefficient. (b) The AR of the reflected wave.
    In case of EF=0.5 eV and N=3, the amplitude of the reflection coefficient (|Ruu| and |Rvu|) and the PCR for linear polarization conversion.
    Fig. 3. In case of EF=0.5eV and N=3, the amplitude of the reflection coefficient (|Ruu| and |Rvu|) and the PCR for linear polarization conversion.
    AR of the reflection wave plotted as a function of EF.
    Fig. 4. AR of the reflection wave plotted as a function of EF.
    In case of EF=0 eV, the simulated Ruu, Rvu, and ellipticity for N=1,2,and3. (a) The amplitudes and the phase difference of Ruu and Rvu. (b) The ellipticity.
    Fig. 5. In case of EF=0eV, the simulated Ruu, Rvu, and ellipticity for N=1,2,and3. (a) The amplitudes and the phase difference of Ruu and Rvu. (b) The ellipticity.
    Device performance varied with N. (a) The |Ruu| and |Rvu|. (b) The PCR. (c) The relationship between Vg and EF.
    Fig. 6. Device performance varied with N. (a) The |Ruu| and |Rvu|. (b) The PCR. (c) The relationship between Vg and EF.
    (a), (b) The equivalent circuits of the metasurface for x- and y-polarized incident waves. (c), (d) The equivalent circuit models along the x and y directions.
    Fig. 7. (a), (b) The equivalent circuits of the metasurface for x- and y-polarized incident waves. (c), (d) The equivalent circuit models along the x and y directions.
    (a) Resistance and (b) inductance for different EF and N.
    Fig. 8. (a) Resistance and (b) inductance for different EF and N.
    Simulated S11 for the equivalent circuit models and the reflective coefficients (Rxx and Ryy) simulated by CST for different EF. (a) EF=0 eV and (b) EF=0.5 eV.
    Fig. 9. Simulated S11 for the equivalent circuit models and the reflective coefficients (Rxx and Ryy) simulated by CST for different EF. (a) EF=0eV and (b) EF=0.5eV.
     Lx(pH)Cx(fF)Rx(Ω)Cy(fF)Ly(pH)Ry(Ω)
    Parameter (EF=0eV)
    Initial60.700.090.10
    Optimal80.222.560.0678.56
    Parameter (EF=0.5V)
    Initial60.700.090.10
    Optimal90.6510.0678.56
    Table 1. Optimized Values of the Circuit Elements for N=3
    Junxiang Huang, Tao Fu, Haiou Li, Zhaoyu Shou, Xi Gao. A reconfigurable terahertz polarization converter based on metal–graphene hybrid metasurface[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2020, 18(1): 013102
    Download Citation