
- Photonics Research
- Vol. 10, Issue 8, 1859 (2022)
Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
Microresonator-based frequency combs (microcombs) [1,2] have emerged as a state-of-the-art scheme by pumping a continuous-wave (CW) pump laser into a high-
One essential problem that prevents the generation of DKSs is the resonance frequency shift caused by the thermo-optic effect when the microcombs transit from a chaotic state to a soliton state with a sudden decrease of the intracavity power [23]. The resonance frequency shift can be overcome with a lot of methods such as a rapid frequency sweep of the pump laser [24], power kicking [25], backward tuning [26], a pulse-driven scheme [27], auxiliary laser-assisted thermal compensation [16,28–31], and self-injection locking [32,33]. Among them, the auxiliary laser-assisted scheme is particularly fascinating, owing to the ease of operation for the single-soliton generation. However, the adoption of another independent laser, fiber circulators, and an amplifier in the opposite direction makes the microcomb generation system much more complicated. Recently, an alternative option that utilizes an optical sideband generated from a modulator to replace the auxiliary laser has been put forward, which could simplify the setups and promote the soliton microcomb generation to some extent, such as exciting either the same mode [34] or two neighboring cavity modes [35] in the same direction or exciting the same mode in the opposite direction [36].
Another key challenge that disturbs the DKSs microcomb’s stability is the microresonator refractive index change with a temperature exchange between the microresonator and the surrounding environment. Therefore, the frequency detuning between the pump laser and resonance frequency would drift out of the soliton existence range [37]. To circumvent this issue, some feedback and locking techniques can be employed to maintain long-term operation stability and reduce the phase noise of the microcombs. Once the repetition rate (
Sign up for Photonics Research TOC. Get the latest issue of Photonics Research delivered right to you!Sign up now
In this work, a novel high-fidelity 100 GHz single-soliton microcomb generation scheme is put forward by combining an optical sideband thermal compensation method with a rapid frequency sweep method, in which no circulators and extra amplifiers are required. Compared to merely using the rapid frequency sweep method, the new scheme has a low pump power requirement about 580 mW and extends the soliton existence range from 146 MHz to 3 GHz. Here, the soliton existence range is defined as the frequency range that the pump laser can sweep without losing the soliton microcombs. Besides, due to the thermal compensation effect, the thermo-refractive noise can also be reduced. It is found that the soliton microcombs possess an enhanced repetition rate stability and a decrease in the effective linewidth. When locking
2. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP AND SOLITON MICROCOMB GENERATION
Figure 1(a) shows the schematic of the experimental setup for 100 GHz DKS microcomb generation. A CW pump laser at around 1550 nm followed by a suppressed-carrier single-sideband modulator (SC-SSBM), a phase modulator (PM1), and an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) is coupled into a
Figure 1.Experimental setup and 100 GHz soliton microcomb generation. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup. AWG, arbitrary waveform generator; SC-SSBM, suppressed-carrier single-sideband modulator; VCO, voltage-controlled oscillator; PM, phase modulator; DDS, direct digital synthesis; OSA, optical spectrum analyzer; FBG, fiber Bragg grating; OSC, oscilloscope; BPF, band-pass filter; SG, signal generator; Rb clock, rubidium clock. (b) Theory illustration of the pump sideband thermal compensation effect. (c) Observed soliton steps versus scan time in the OSC. The blue curve shows a driving voltage control signal in the AWG, and the red curve shows a microcomb power trace excluding the pump. (d) Optical spectrum of the generated single-soliton state microcomb. A fitted
In the scheme, a rapid frequency sweep method is employed to initiate the DKS microcomb. When the microcombs transform from a high-power chaotic state to a low-power soliton state, the resonator will have a frequency blueshift with a fall of temperature, thus hindering the soliton microcomb formation. This method can overcome the thermal effect of the cavity by optimizing the tuning speed and range parameters. Specifically, the suppressed-carrier single-sideband frequency sweeps from 8.75 to 10.93 GHz within 80 ns, and the voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) drive voltage is ramped from 4.0 to 8.2 V through an arbitrary waveform generator (AWG). It must be figured out that the fast frequency shifting (up to 27.25 GHz/μs) corresponding to the thermo-optic response time enables the generation of soliton microcombs with high fidelity. This specific tuning range and velocity of the pump laser could satisfy the thermal equilibrium condition of the single-soliton microcomb in the resonator and the ambient environment. Usually, according to Ref. [40], about 1 W on-chip power is indispensable for 100 GHz soliton microcomb generation by the rapid frequency sweep method. The loaded Q (about
Therefore, based on the auxiliary laser-assisted method, this issue can be addressed by taking advantage of the cavity thermal compensation effect. Owing to the extended existence range of solitons and the smaller cavity thermal change, a much lower power requirement can be realized [29]. Different from the complicated individual auxiliary laser, an optical sideband can be generated by directly modulating the pump laser with the PM1 and utilized as an auxiliary laser. Thus, a miniaturized system can be realized without excess fiber amplifiers and circulators.
The thermal compensation effect can be explained in Fig. 1(b). When the DKS microcombs are initiated, the pump laser and the red detuned pump sideband are located at the red side of the cavity resonance frequency, and the blue detuned pump sideband is located at the blue side of the cavity resonance frequency. It should be noted that the sideband at the red detuned position relative to the pump mode has little effect because it is far from the cavity resonance. In this case, the blue detuned pump sideband stays in the thermal self-lock region and mitigates the resonance frequency shift by compensating for the thermal change. When the pump laser jitters and moves toward the longer wavelength (shorter wavelength), the pump sideband follows the pump laser to the longer wavelength (shorter wavelength) with a fixed detuning, causing the cavity power increment (decrease) and a redshift (blueshift) of the cavity resonance frequency. As a consequence, there is a lesser variation of the relative detuning between the pump laser and cavity resonance frequency compared to the situation without an auxiliary optical sideband.
In the experiment, estimated on-chip power of only 580 mW was utilized to generate the single DKS microcombs. However, when based solely on the rapid sweep method, the single-soliton state was incapable of existence due to the short soliton step. Hence, an RF signal from the direct digital synthesis (DDS1) referenced to a rubidium atomic clock is set at 1000 MHz, which is nearly in the middle of the measured working range (0.5–1.4 GHz) and modulated on PM1 to generate two optical sidebands. Only the pump laser and blueshifted optical sideband that are close to the cavity resonance can be allowed to enter the cavity. Note that the power ratio between the sideband and the pump stays the same even after the optical amplification. The RF power used for microcomb generation is about 7 dBm, corresponding to a blueshifted sideband power of about 53 mW and a pump laser power of about 474 mW. The concrete influence of the power allocation will be discussed below. By combining the rapid frequency sweep method with the sideband thermal compensation method, a single-soliton microcomb can be accessed easily. The microcomb’s power and VCO control voltage are monitored by an oscilloscope (OSC), and a clear power transition called the soliton step can be seen in Fig. 1(c) during the scan procedure. There is a drift between the control signal and the detected comb signal, which can be possibly ascribed to the detection signal delay.
Figure 1(d) shows a typical optical spectrum of the single-soliton microcomb measured with an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA). The spectrum is well fitted by a
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A. Sideband Thermal Compensation Effect
The other part of the output from the microresonator is used for repetition rate detection and locking. Due to the large 100 GHz repetition rate, it is difficult to measure it directly. Usually, downconverting it to a detectable RF signal (below 25 GHz) is appropriate for analysis. Nevertheless, some electric devices such as frequency dividers with large conversion loss and additional phase noise are not suitable. Photoelectric combination methods such as electro-optic (EO) frequency combs or microresonator DKS microcombs with much smaller repetition rates have shown great potential and chip capability for downconverting.
As indicated in Fig. 1(a), different schematic microcomb states are shown after different devices. Auxiliary EO frequency combs are adopted to realize downconverting. As shown in Fig. 2(a), two frequency lines of the pump and the adjacent microcomb are filtered by a tunable bandpass filter (BPF), then amplified by an EDFA, and sent to a PM2 driven by a 25.38555 GHz microwave signal generator referenced to a rubidium atomic clock for EO frequency comb generation. The center of spectral overlaps (second EO frequency comb) generated around the two DKS microcombs, is filtered with a 0.1 nm bandwidth BPF and sent to a photodetector (PD). By adjusting the polarization of the down-converting system, an optimized EO frequency combs shape with a maximum beat signal can be acquired. Then, the total soliton repetition rate can be obtained by adding the beat signal and four repetition rate signals of the EO frequency combs. For example, a beat signal of about 200 MHz indicates a total repetition rate of about 101.7422 GHz for the DKS microcomb.
Figure 2.(a) The EO frequency combs optical spectra of the selected two soliton microcomb lines. (b) Soliton existence area and soliton repetition rate variation with different RF modulation strengths. The arrow direction represents an increase in RF modulation intensity, and the red lines represent linear fit results. (c) Transmission spectrum of the cavity resonant mode with different laser sideband powers. (d) Dependence of the cavity resonance frequency redshift peak on the on-chip optical sideband power and a linear fit.
Thereafter, the effect of the sideband power on generating optical microcombs was investigated. Repetition rate variations versus pump frequency tuning range under different modulation strengths (7, 4, 1,
In general, the soliton existence frequency range, judged by the piezoelectric change of the pump laser with a resolving accuracy of 4 MHz, can be improved from 146.1 to 3080 MHz, which is 21 times the range without modulation. Furthermore, the value of repetition rate is influenced by the dispersion waves or Raman effect, which is correlated to the cavity-pump detuning [44]. Therefore, by changing the pump laser frequency, the repetition rate can also have a linear variation. Besides, the range of repetition rate variation has been strengthened a lot from 2.2 to 3.87 MHz with the increment of the pump sideband power. Although the pump sideband does not increase the cavity-pump detuning range, the thermal compensation effect can help measure the repetition rate at the cavity-pump detuning position much closer to the boundary. By linear fitting, the slope changes from 14.8 to 1.21 kHz/MHz. To further prove that the increment of the soliton existence range comes from the thermal compensation effect of sideband power, as shown in Fig. 2(c), another experiment on the cavity resonance frequency response transmission spectrum of various pump sideband power has been executed with OSC. In this experiment, only a tunable CW laser, which represents the auxiliary sideband, is injected to the microresonator, detected by the PD, and then collected in the OSC. Along with the increment of sideband power from 1 to 51 mW, a triangular-shape resonance appears with a sudden jump corresponding to the thermal bistability and shifts to a longer wavelength. In addition, by linearly fitting the cavity resonance frequency with different on-chip powers, a slope of 62.05 MHz/mW can be obtained. When the on-chip power comes up to about 50 mW below the optical parametric oscillation threshold, a resonance redshift for near 3.1 GHz can be obtained, which is approximate with the measured maximum soliton existence range. Therefore, the resonance frequency compensation effect caused by the optical sideband is the main reason for the increased soliton existence range.
B. Repetition Rate Locking and Tuning
To stabilize the repetition rate signal of the DKS microcomb, the downconverted RF signal (
Figure 3.Locking of the soliton repetition rate. (a) Optical spectrum evolution color map beyond 12 h between 1530 and 1565 nm. The color bar reflects the power amplitude in the unit of decibel-milliwatts (dBm). (b) Free-running repetition rate measurements without (blue, right axis) and with (red, right axis) modulation and locked signal (yellow, left axis) measurement within 3 h. (c) Histogram of the locked repetition rate signal. (d) Allan deviations of the free-running repetition rate signal without modulation (blue line) and with modulation (red line), the in-loop locked repetition rate signal (yellow line), and the used Rb atomic clock (purple line).
For evaluating the long-term locking performance of the repetition rate, a 3 h frequency stability measurement of the downconverted RF signal (
Allan deviations have also been calculated in Fig. 3(d) to demonstrate the
In Fig. 4, a quantitative analysis on the downconverted
Figure 4.RF spectra of (a) free-running repetition rate without modulation at 1 kHz resolution bandwidth (RBW), (b) free-running repetition rate with modulation at 200 Hz RBW, and (c) locked repetition rate at 1 Hz RBW. (d) Single-sideband (SSB) phase noise spectra of repetition rate in the free-running state without modulation (blue line), with modulation (red line), and locked state (yellow line).
To further explore the SSB phase noise characteristics of the downconverted
The capability for repetition rate variation and locking with pump detuning offers the possibility for
The setup for repetition rate tuning is the same as the above locking scheme. In detail, the
Figure 5.Tuning of the soliton repetition rate. (a) Measured time-repetition rate scan maps of soliton microcombs, with the repetition rate variation of 2.5 MHz. (b) Rapid repetition rate tuning measurement at 1 ms gate time, in which the blue circles represent the control signal from the DDS2 and the yellow circles represent the repetition rate measurement results.
C. Frequency Noise and Linewidth Analysis
The frequency noise and linewidth of the microcomb reflect the coherence performance, which are essential for most applications. Here, frequency noises of different optical microcomb modes and states have been measured and compared using a delayed self-heterodyne setup [46]. The test scheme is illustrated in detail in Fig. 6(a). The soliton microcomb modes can be separated from each other through a commercial arrayed waveguide grating, and one of the microcomb modes is sent into an EDFA to be amplified to 20 mW. Then an unbalanced Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI), consisting of a 32 m long fiber delay line, is used for subcoherence measurement. To avoid strong zero-frequency noise, the acousto-optic modulator (AOM) is placed in the shorter arm driven by a low-noise microwave source of 80 MHz for heterodyne interference. The output beating signals are detected by a PD, and then they are recorded and analyzed by the SSA.
Figure 6.Frequency noise and linewidth measurements. (a) Experimental setup of the test scheme. PC, polarization controller; AOM, acousto-optic modulator; PD, photodetector; SSA, signal source analyzer. (b) and (c) Measured frequency noise spectra from 100 Hz to 40 MHz of C34 and C54, respectively. The blue, red, and yellow lines are states of free-running without modulation, with modulation, and of locked operation, respectively.
The frequency noise and linewidth of the microcombs can be analyzed by the single-sideband power spectral density
Furthermore, frequency noise spectra of 41 microcomb modes centered at the pump laser have been measured from 100 Hz to 40 MHz. For clarification and comparison, Figs. 6(b) and 6(c) show the frequency noise of pump mode C34 (channel 34 of C band, 1550.12 nm) and marginal mode C54 (channel 54 of C band, 1534.25 nm). The spectra are hindered by the spikes at 6.3 MHz and their harmonics up to a point, which are the frequency fringes corresponding to the FSR of MZI, but it is insusceptible to observing the low-frequency noise behavior. Then the calculated effective linewidth variations are shown in Fig. 6(d). Three different microcomb states are listed, in which the blue, red, and yellow lines are frequency noise spectra of free-running without modulation, with modulation, and of locked operation, respectively.
For the linewidth of free-running microcombs in Fig. 6(d), due to the instability of the repetition rate, the decoherence of the microcombs is discovered as the linewidth increases quadratically with the microcomb mode away from the pump. Furthermore, as can be seen from the low-frequency noise in Figs. 6(b) and 6(c) dominated by the thermal noise, the microcombs with modulation have a weaker low-frequency noise above the
For the linewidth of the repetition rate locked microcombs in Fig. 6(d), as expected, linewidths of different microcomb modes are nearly the same because of the high stability of
4. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the generation, stabilization, and tuning of the 100 GHz DKS microcomb are experimentally demonstrated in this work. By taking advantage of the optical sideband thermal compensation effect, a much larger soliton existence range of 3 GHz, a simplified setup, and less pump power have been accessed. Besides, this thermal compensation effect can effectively counteract thermo-refractive noise and achieve enhanced repetition rate stability and a decrease in the effective linewidth of the microcomb lines. The repetition rate microwave signal could be downconverted and phase-locked to a rubidium atomic clock. The in-loop fractional frequency instability of the locking state is about
References
[1] P. Del’Haye, A. Schliesser, O. Arcizet, T. Wilken, R. Holzwarth, T. J. Kippenberg. Optical frequency comb generation from a monolithic microresonator. Nature, 450, 1214-1217(2007).
[2] W. Wang, L. Wang, W. Zhang. Advances in soliton microcomb generation. Adv. Photonics, 2, 034001(2020).
[3] T. Herr, V. Brasch, J. D. Jost, C. Y. Wang, N. M. Kondratiev, M. L. Gorodetsky, T. J. Kippenberg. Temporal solitons in optical microresonators. Nat. Photonics, 8, 145-152(2013).
[4] P. Marin-Palomo, J. N. Kemal, M. Karpov, A. Kordts, J. Pfeifle, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, P. Trocha, S. Wolf, V. Brasch, M. H. Anderson, R. Rosenberger, K. Vijayan, W. Freude, T. J. Kippenberg, C. Koos. Microresonator-based solitons for massively parallel coherent optical communications. Nature, 546, 274-279(2017).
[5] Y. Geng, H. Zhou, X. Han, W. Cui, Q. Zhang, B. Liu, G. Deng, Q. Zhou, K. Qiu. Coherent optical communications using coherence-cloned Kerr soliton microcombs. Nat. Commun., 13, 1070(2022).
[6] D. T. Spencer, T. Drake, T. C. Briles, J. Stone, L. C. Sinclair, C. Fredrick, Q. Li, D. Westly, B. R. Ilic, A. Bluestone, N. Volet, T. Komljenovic, L. Chang, S. H. Lee, D. Y. Oh, M.-G. Suh, K. Y. Yang, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, T. J. Kippenberg, E. Norberg, L. Theogarajan, K. Vahala, N. R. Newbury, K. Srinivasan, J. E. Bowers, S. A. Diddams, S. B. Papp. An optical-frequency synthesizer using integrated photonics. Nature, 557, 81-85(2018).
[7] R. Niu, S. Wan, J. Li, R.-C. Zhao, C.-L. Zou, G.-C. Guo, C. Dong. Fast spectroscopy based on a modulated soliton microcomb. IEEE Photon. J., 13, 6801204(2021).
[8] J. Zheng, Y. Wang, X. Wang, F. Zhang, W. Wang, X. Ma, J. Wang, J. Chen, L. Jia, M. Song, M. Yuan, B. Little, S. T. Chu, D. Cheng, X. Qu, W. Zhao, W. Zhang. Optical ranging system based on multiple pulse train interference using soliton microcomb. Appl. Phys. Lett., 118, 261106(2021).
[9] T. Tetsumoto, F. Ayano, M. Yeo, J. Webber, T. Nagatsuma, A. Rolland. 300 GHz wave generation based on a Kerr microresonator frequency comb stabilized to a low noise microwave reference. Opt. Lett., 45, 4377-4380(2020).
[10] J. Liu, E. Lucas, A. S. Raja, J. He, J. Riemensberger, R. N. Wang, M. Karpov, H. Guo, R. Bouchand, T. J. Kippenberg. Photonic microwave generation in the X- and K-band using integrated soliton microcombs. Nat. Photonics, 14, 486-491(2020).
[11] X. Xu, M. Tan, B. Corcoran, J. Wu, A. Boes, T. G. Nguyen, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, D. G. Hicks, R. Morandotti, A. Mitchell, D. J. Moss. 11 TOPS photonic convolutional accelerator for optical neural networks. Nature, 589, 44-51(2021).
[12] H. Weng, J. Liu, A. A. Afridi, J. Li, J. Dai, X. Ma, Y. Zhang, Q. Lu, J. F. Donegan, W. Guo. Directly accessing octave-spanning dissipative Kerr soliton frequency combs in an AlN microresonator. Photon. Res., 9, 1351-1357(2021).
[13] M. Zhang, B. Buscaino, C. Wang, A. Shams-Ansari, C. Reimer, R. Zhu, J. M. Kahn, M. Loncar. Broadband electro-optic frequency comb generation in a lithium niobate microring resonator. Nature, 568, 373-377(2019).
[14] X. Yi, Q.-F. Yang, K. Y. Yang, M.-G. Suh, K. Vahala. Soliton frequency comb at microwave rates in a high-
[15] J. S. Levy, A. Gondarenko, M. A. Foster, A. C. Turner-Foster, A. L. Gaeta, M. Lipson. CMOS-compatible multiple-wavelength oscillator for on-chip optical interconnects. Nat. Photonics, 4, 37-40(2009).
[16] X. Wang, P. Xie, W. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Lu, L. Wang, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, W. Zhao, W. Zhang. Program-controlled single soliton microcomb source. Photon. Res., 9, 66-72(2020).
[17] W. Xie, C. Xiang, L. Chang, W. Jin, J. Peters, J. E. Bowers. Silicon-integrated nonlinear III-V photonics. Photon. Res., 10, 535-541(2022).
[18] S. Wan, R. Niu, J.-L. Peng, J. Li, G.-C. Guo, C.-L. Zou, C.-H. Dong. Fabrication of the high-
[19] S. Wan, R. Niu, Z.-Y. Wang, J.-L. Peng, M. Li, J. Li, G.-C. Guo, C.-L. Zou, C.-H. Dong. Frequency stabilization and tuning of breathing solitons in Si3N4 microresonators. Photon. Res., 8, 1342-1349(2020).
[20] J. Ma, X. Jiang, M. Xiao. Kerr frequency combs in large-size, ultra-high-
[21] J. Ma, L. Xiao, J. Gu, H. Li, X. Cheng, G. He, X. Jiang, M. Xiao. Visible Kerr comb generation in a high-
[22] L. Chang, W. Xie, H. Shu, Q. F. Yang, B. Shen, A. Boes, J. D. Peters, W. Jin, C. Xiang, S. Liu, G. Moille, S. P. Yu, X. Wang, K. Srinivasan, S. B. Papp, K. Vahala, J. E. Bowers. Ultra-efficient frequency comb generation in AlGaAs-on-insulator microresonators. Nat. Commun., 11, 1331(2020).
[23] G. Moille, L. Chang, W. Xie, A. Rao, X. Lu, M. Davanço, J. E. Bowers, K. Srinivasan. Dissipative Kerr solitons in a III–V microresonator. Laser Photon. Rev., 14, 2000022(2020).
[24] J. R. Stone, T. C. Briles, T. E. Drake, D. T. Spencer, D. R. Carlson, S. A. Diddams, S. B. Papp. Thermal and nonlinear dissipative-soliton dynamics in Kerr-microresonator frequency combs. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 063902(2018).
[25] V. Brasch, M. Geiselmann, M. H. Pfeiffer, T. J. Kippenberg. Bringing short-lived dissipative Kerr soliton states in microresonators into a steady state. Opt. Express, 24, 29312-29320(2016).
[26] H. Guo, M. Karpov, E. Lucas, A. Kordts, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, V. Brasch, G. Lihachev, V. E. Lobanov, M. L. Gorodetsky, T. J. Kippenberg. Universal dynamics and deterministic switching of dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microresonators. Nat. Phys., 13, 94-102(2016).
[27] E. Obrzud, S. Lecomte, T. Herr. Temporal solitons in microresonators driven by optical pulses. Nat. Photonics, 11, 600-607(2017).
[28] Y. Zhao, L. Chen, C. Zhang, W. Wang, H. Hu, R. Wang, X. Wang, S. T. Chu, B. Little, W. Zhang, X. Zhang. Soliton burst and bi‐directional switching in the platform with positive thermal‐refractive coefficient using an auxiliary laser. Laser Photon. Rev., 15, 2100264(2021).
[29] H. Zhou, Y. Geng, W. Cui, S. W. Huang, Q. Zhou, K. Qiu, C. Wei Wong. Soliton bursts and deterministic dissipative Kerr soliton generation in auxiliary-assisted microcavities. Light Sci. Appl., 8, 1(2019).
[30] Z. Lu, W. Wang, W. Zhang, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, M. Liu, L. Wang, C.-L. Zou, C.-H. Dong, B. Zhao, W. Zhao. Deterministic generation and switching of dissipative Kerr soliton in a thermally controlled micro-resonator. AIP Adv., 9, 025314(2019).
[31] S. Zhang, J. M. Silver, L. Del Bino, F. Copie, M. T. M. Woodley, G. N. Ghalanos, A. Ø. Svela, N. Moroney, P. Del’Haye. Sub-milliwatt-level microresonator solitons with extended access range using an auxiliary laser. Optica, 6, 206-212(2019).
[32] C. Xiang, J. Liu, J. Guo, L. Chang, R. N. Wang, W. Weng, J. Peters, W. Xie, Z. Zhang, J. J. S. Riemensberger. Laser soliton microcombs heterogeneously integrated on silicon. Science, 373, 99-103(2021).
[33] B. Stern, X. Ji, Y. Okawachi, A. L. Gaeta, M. Lipson. Battery-operated integrated frequency comb generator. Nature, 562, 401-405(2018).
[34] T. Wildi, V. Brasch, J. Liu, T. J. Kippenberg, T. Herr. Thermally stable access to microresonator solitons via slow pump modulation. Opt. Lett., 44, 4447-4450(2019).
[35] F. Lei, Z. Ye, V. Torres-Company. Thermal noise reduction in soliton microcombs via laser self-cooling. Opt. Lett., 47, 513-516(2022).
[36] K. Nishimoto, K. Minoshima, T. Yasui, N. Kuse. Thermal control of a Kerr microresonator soliton comb via an optical sideband. Opt. Lett., 47, 281-284(2022).
[37] T. E. Drake, J. R. Stone, T. C. Briles, S. B. Papp. Thermal decoherence and laser cooling of Kerr microresonator solitons. Nat. Photonics, 14, 480-485(2020).
[38] T. Tetsumoto, T. Nagatsuma, M. E. Fermann, G. Navickaite, M. Geiselmann, A. Rolland. Optically referenced 300 GHz millimetre-wave oscillator. Nat. Photonics, 15, 516-522(2021).
[39] S. Zhang, J. M. Silver, X. Shang, L. Del Bino, N. M. Ridler, P. Del’Haye. Terahertz wave generation using a soliton microcomb. Opt. Express, 27, 35257-35266(2019).
[40] B. Wang, J. S. Morgan, K. Sun, M. Jahanbozorgi, Z. Yang, M. Woodson, S. Estrella, A. Beling, X. Yi. Towards high-power, high-coherence, integrated photonic mmWave platform with microcavity solitons. Light Sci. Appl., 10, 4(2021).
[41] Y. Okawachi, B. Y. Kim, Y. Zhao, J. K. Jang, X. Ji, M. Lipson, A. L. Gaeta. Active tuning of dispersive waves in Kerr soliton combs. Opt. Lett., 47, 2234-2237(2022).
[42] A. Kordts, M. H. Pfeiffer, H. Guo, V. Brasch, T. J. Kippenberg. Higher order mode suppression in high-
[43] M. Karpov, H. Guo, A. Kordts, V. Brasch, M. H. Pfeiffer, M. Zervas, M. Geiselmann, T. J. Kippenberg. Raman self-frequency shift of dissipative Kerr solitons in an optical microresonator. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 103902(2016).
[44] X. Yi, Q. F. Yang, X. Zhang, K. Y. Yang, X. Li, K. Vahala. Single-mode dispersive waves and soliton microcomb dynamics. Nat. Commun., 8, 14869(2017).
[45] Y. Nakajima, K. Minoshima. Highly stabilized optical frequency comb interferometer with a long fiber-based reference path towards arbitrary distance measurement. Opt. Express, 23, 25979-25987(2015).
[46] M. A. Tran, D. Huang, J. E. Bowers. Tutorial on narrow linewidth tunable semiconductor lasers using Si/III-V heterogeneous integration. APL Photon., 4, 111101(2019).
[47] S. Camatel, V. Ferrero. Narrow linewidth CW laser phase noise characterization methods for coherent transmission system applications. J. Lightwave Technol., 26, 3048-3055(2008).
[48] D. Xu, B. Lu, F. Yang, D. Chen, H. Cai, R. Qu. Narrow linewidth single-frequency laser noise measurement based on a 3×3 fiber coupler. Chin. J. Lasers, 43, 0102004(2016).

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address