[1] Is the energy intensity a less useful indicator than the carbon factor in the study of climate change?. Energy Policy, 27, 943-946(1999).
[2] Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: A slacks-based efficiency measure. Applied Energy, 98, 198-208(2012).
[3] Characteristics analysis and factor decomposition based on the regional difference changes in China’s CO2 emission. Journal of Natural Resources, 29, 189-200(2014).
[4] Sources of the potential CO2 emission reduction in China: A nonparametric metafrontier approach. Applied Energy, 115, 491-501(2014).
[5] et alRegional environmental efficiency evaluation in China: Analysis based on the Super-SBM model with undesirable outputs. Mathematical & Computer Modelling, 58, 1018-1031(2013).
[6] World Energy Outlook 2012. Paris:International Energy Agency (IEA)(2012).
[7] et alImpact of future urban form on the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from residential, commercial and public buildings in Utsunomiya, Japan. Energy Policy, 38, 4888-4896(2010).
[8] Space-time analysis of GDP disparities among European regions: A Markov chains approach. International Regional Science Review, 27, 138-163(2004).
[9] Correlation analysis of carbon emission intensity and industrial structure in China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 22, 7-14(2012).
[10] Measuring the win-win performance of China’s carbon reduction and economic growth with energy constraint: A range-adjusted measure of non-radial DEA. China Economic Quarterly, 12, 667-692(2013).
[11] et alExamining the effects of income inequality on CO2 emissions: Evidence from non-spatial and spatial perspectives. Applied Energy, 236, 163-171(2019).
[12] et alDEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs. Annals of Operations Research, 173, 177-194(2010).
[13] An empirical analysis on the provincial energy efficiency in China based on SBM model of undesirable output. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 45, 35-43(2015).
[14] et alA calculation method of CO2 emission from urban energy consumption. Resources Science, 33, 1325-1330(2011).
[15] et alAnalysis of low-carbon economy efficiency of Chinese industrial sectors based on a RAM model with undesirable outputs. Sustainability, 9, 451(2017).
[16] Communication the evolution of the “carbonization index” in developing countries. Energy Policy, 27, 307-308(1999).
[17] et alExamining the impact factors of energy-related CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model in Guangdong Province, China. Applied Energy, 106, 65-71(2013).
[18] Combining indicators of energy consumption and CO2 emissions: A cross-country comparison. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 17, 214-227(2002).
[19] Spatial empirics for economic growth and convergence. Geographical Analysis, 33, 195-214(2010).
[20] et alIndustrial CO2 emissions efficiency and its determinants in China: Analyzing differences across regions and industry sectors. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 27, 1239-1254(2018).
[21] et alEvaluation, influencing factors and promotion countermeasures of cities’ carbon emissions efficiencies in Shandong province. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences), 34, 15-21(2018).
[22] A cross-national study of the association between per capita carbon dioxide emissions and exports to the United States. Social Science Research, 38, 239-250(2009).
[23] et alThe characteristics and mechanisms of carbon emissions from energy consumption in China using DMSP/OLS night light imageries. Acta Geographica Sinica, 68, 1513-1526(2013).
[24] The decrease of CO emission intensity is decarbonization at national and global levels. Energy Policy, 33, 975-978(2005).
[25] A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 498-509(2001).
[26] A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 143, 32-41(2002).
[27] Measuring and decomposing energy productivity of China's industries under carbon emission constraints. Journal of Financial Research, 10, 128(2013).
[28] et alEvaluating the energy-environment efficiency and its determinants in Guangdong using a slack-based measure with environmental undesirable outputs and panel data model. Science of the Total Environment, 663, 878-888(2019).
[29] Research on dynamic carbon dioxide emissions performance, regional disparity and affecting factors in China. China Industrial Economics, 45-54(2010).
[30] Regional carbon dioxide emission performance and its reduction potential based on environmental production technology: The case of main industrial provinces in China. Studies in Science of Science, 29, 868-875(2011).
[31] et alDecarbonizing China’s urban agglomerations. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109, 266-285(2019).
[32] Spatial spillover effect and driving forces of carbon emission intensity at city level in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 74, 1131-1148(2019).
[33] et alThe relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from China. Science of The Total Environment, 542, 360-371(2016).
[34] China’s city-level energy-related CO2 emissions: Spatiotemporal patterns and driving forces. Applied Energy, 200, 204-214(2017).
[35] et alExamining the impacts of socioeconomic factors, urban form, and transportation networks on CO2 emissions in China’s megacities. Applied Energy, 185, 189-200(2017).
[36] Review of energy-related CO2 emission in response to climate change. Progress in Geography, 34, 151-164(2015).
[37] Regional inequality, spatial spillover effects and influencing factors of China’s city-level energy-related carbon emissions. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73, 414-428(2018).
[38] et alEstimating the impacts of urban form on CO2 emission efficiency in the Pearl River Delta, China. Cities, 85, 117-129(2019).
[39] Performance of carbon emission in Hunan province based on three-stage SBM model. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology (Social Sciences), 13, 23-30(2019).
[40] Spatial-temporal differences and influencing factors of carbon emission efficiency in Hunan province based on SBM-DEA model. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 39, 797-806(2019).
[41] Space dependence, carbon emissions and economic growth: Reinterpret China’s EKC hypothesis. Probe, 100-105(2011).
[42] Dynamics, space, and regional inequality in provincial China: A case study of Guangdong province. Applied Geography, 35, 71-83(2012).
[43] World Development Indicators 2010(2010).
[44] Decomposition model and empirical study of carbon emissions for China, 1995-2004. China Population, Resources and Environment, 16, 158-161(2006).
[45] Influential factors and policy implications of carbon emissions for energy consumption in China. Resources Science, 34, 2-12(2012).
[46] et alA study on economic measures for CO2 reduction in Japan. Energy Policy, 21, 123-132(1993).
[47] The convergent evolution of China’s regional economic development models. Geographical Research, 34, 2005-2020(2015).
[48] Research on static level, dynamic change and affecting factors of industrial carbon emissions performance: An empirical analysis based on Chinese provincial panel data. Journal of Shanxi Finance and Economics University, 71-80(2012).
[49] et alRegional low-carbon economy efficiency in China: Analysis based on the Super-SBM model with CO2 emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 163, 202-211(2017).
[50] Has transport infrastructure promoted regional economic growth? With an analysis of the spatial effects of transport infrasturcture. Social Sciences in China, 60-77(2012).
[51] A quantitative comparison and analysis on the assessment indicators of greenhouse gases emission. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 18, 387-399(2008).
[52] Research on carbon cycle and carbon balance of Nanjing urban system. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67, 758-770(2012).
[53] Research on carbon emission intensity and carbon footprint of different industrial spaces in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65, 1048-1057(2010).
[54] et alEstimation of eco-efficiency and its influencing factors in Guangdong province based on Super-SBM and panel regression models. Ecological Indicators, 86, 67-80(2018).
[55] Total factor carbon emission performance: A Malmquist index analysis. Energy Economics, 32, 194-201(2010).