• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 14, 1410015 (2021)
Qingjiang Chen, Jinyang Li*, and Qiannan Hu
Author Affiliations
  • School of Science, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710055, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.1410015 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Qingjiang Chen, Jinyang Li, Qiannan Hu. Low-Illumination Image Enhancement Algorithm Based on Parallel Residual Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(14): 1410015 Copy Citation Text show less
    Structure of residual learning model
    Fig. 1. Structure of residual learning model
    Structure of parallel residual network model
    Fig. 2. Structure of parallel residual network model
    InceptionNet V1 network structure used in this paper
    Fig. 3. InceptionNet V1 network structure used in this paper
    Alternating residual model and local global residual model
    Fig. 4. Alternating residual model and local global residual model
    Comparison of subjective visual results for different combinations of loss functions
    Fig. 5. Comparison of subjective visual results for different combinations of loss functions
    Comparision of subjective visual results between our algorithm and seven contrast algorithms on real dataset
    Fig. 6. Comparision of subjective visual results between our algorithm and seven contrast algorithms on real dataset
    Comparision of subjective visual results between our algorithm and seven contrast algorithms on synthetic dataset
    Fig. 7. Comparision of subjective visual results between our algorithm and seven contrast algorithms on synthetic dataset
    Comparison of subjective visual results of different algorithms on low-illumination images without contrast map
    Fig. 8. Comparison of subjective visual results of different algorithms on low-illumination images without contrast map
    Three comparative model structures
    Fig. 9. Three comparative model structures
    Comparison of subjective visual results of four model structures
    Fig. 10. Comparison of subjective visual results of four model structures
    LossPSNRSSIM
    L'123.0390.7947
    L'224.8330.8269
    L'327.1490.8434
    L'427.3750.8807
    Table 1. Calculation results of PSNR and SSIM for different combinations of loss functions
    ImageEvaluation indexMethod
    SSRMSRCRYingRenBIMEFLIMELiOur
    Image1PSNR /dB12.05917.84414.41211.88418.41221.34520.44728.331
    SSIM0.60130.57940.59690.68350.64690.78980.72590.8997
    Image2PSNR/dB13.46914.00720.89114.55814.82923.96822.42431.087
    SSIM0.59740.57430.75590.82320.60010.85590.70680.9365
    Image3PSNR/dB18.61221.04115.98210.92011.70617.70021.34630.112
    SSIM0.78100.73460.83210.65600.68260.72090.78810.9331
    Image4PSNR/dB15.93113.70620.566214.78015.39424.35517.85825.914
    SSIM0.65810.48310.64050.65040.56740.83340.68490.8343
    Table 2. PSNR and SSIM of our algorithm and seven contrast algorithms on real dataset
    ImageEvaluation indexMethod
    SSRMSRCRYingLiRenBIMEFLIMEOur
    Image1PSNR /dB11.84113.08519.50117.41513.60113.86326.41729.053
    SSIM0.66560.68020.72730.77780.52210.70880.83630.8416
    Image2PSNR /dB11.25311.67422.29319.00215.95116.21823.83029.959
    SSIM0.60310.62400.78870.80490.65410.76530.83230.8746
    Image3PSNR /dB9.880510.94621.45016.57817.09320.70420.30726.423
    SSIM0.54830.56900.68630.66750.48140.76870.77250.8073
    Image4PSNR /dB12.74613.86815.87115.76911.28711.61320.69926.085
    SSIM0.56810.60060.67150.76190.49960.65130.81290.8318
    Table 3. PSNR and SSIM of our algorithm and seven contrast algorithms on synthetic dataset
    MethodEvaluation indexNRSSNIQE
    Image1Image2Image3AverageImage1Image2Image3AverageImage1Image2Image3Average
    SSR6.36357.00937.01776.79680.42080.64080.45110.504221.54330.23728.73526.838
    MSRCR6.25537.15037.18586.83050.41680.64370.48470.412521.17323.28213.11119.189
    Ying4.97716.48086.86226.86380.29630.50070.44060.51519.35211.7699.2110.11
    Li4.77065.60656.58995.65570.36140.49610.39480.417411.51312.0749.92711.171
    Ren4.21155.63186.11825.32050.35590.34420.21840.30629.92717.35111.73813.005
    BIMEF5.30036.49056.81056.20040.34450.62660.52770.49968.79317.85513.2613.303
    LIME5.93616.2747.1536.45440.43940.64920.32260.47048.34720.27512.7213.781
    Our6.57446.82647.02616.8090.37720.64250.60240.54078.26911.7277.5939.196
    Table 4. Information entropy, NRSS and NIQE of low-illumination images without contrast map
    ModelPSNR /dBSSIM
    Model129.5520.9026
    Model229.5640.9048
    Model327.9420.8208
    Model426.1470.8321
    Table 5. PSNR and SSIM results of four network models
    ImageModel
    Model1Model2Model3Model4
    Synthetic image0.65720.83740.59820.6067
    Real image0.64970.86790.58890.6164
    Table 6. Comparison of running time of four models for enhancement of single image
    Qingjiang Chen, Jinyang Li, Qiannan Hu. Low-Illumination Image Enhancement Algorithm Based on Parallel Residual Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(14): 1410015
    Download Citation