Author Affiliations
1College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China2College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210042, China3Geovis Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 101399, China4College of Geodesy and Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Hyperspectral images of cloud detection areas (false color composite image of bands 110, 64, 44 in RGB, the red vector is the visually interpreted cloud boundary). (a) Image a; (b) image b; (c) image c; (d) image d
Fig. 2. Apparent reflectance curves of different ground objects in AHSI hyperspectral image (the averages are shown as solid dots, and the error bars correspond to the standard deviations)
Fig. 3. Band ratio between different types ground objects in AHSI hyperspectral image. (a) Thin cloud; (b) soil; (c) rock
Fig. 4. Cloud detection algorithm flow chart
Fig. 5. Cloud detection results, white represents cloud, and the red vector is the visually interpreted cloud boundary. (a) Image a; (b) image b; (c) image c; (d) image d
Fig. 6. Local comparison of cloud detection results. (a1)(a2) False color image (using bands 110, 64, and 44 to represent the R, G, and B bands, respectively); (b) visual interpretation results, red labeled as cloud pixels; (c) detection results of our algorithm, green labeled as cloud pixels
Instrument | Channel | Spectralrange /μm | Number ofbands | Bandwidth /nm | Swathwidth /km | Spatialresolution /m |
---|
GF-5 AHSI | VIS-NIR | 0.39-1.004 | 150 | 5 | | | | SWIR | 1.01-2.51 | 180 | 10 | 60 | 30 | EO-1 Hyperion | VIS-NIR | 0.356-1.085 | 70 | 10 | | | | SWIR | 0.852-2.577 | 172 | 10 | 7.7 | 30 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of parameters of GF-5 AHSI and EO-1 Hyperion
Sensor | Image | Date | Path /row | Longitude /(°) | Latitude /(°) | Solar zenith /(°) |
---|
| a | 2019-04-08 | 363/530 | 88.8 | 44.8 | 39.35 | AHSI | b | 2019-04-04 | 377/624 | 83.2 | 41.6 | 38.03 | | c | 2019-04-04 | 377/623 | 83.3 | 41.2 | 37.61 | | d | 2019-04-08 | 363/631 | 88.7 | 45.1 | 39.59 |
|
Table 2. Cloud detection image parameters
Image | Proportion /% | Overallaccuracy /% | Producer'saccuracy /% | User'saccuracy /% |
---|
Visual interpretation | Our algorithm |
---|
a | 13.0 | 10.0 | 95 | 71 | 93 | b | 42.0 | 46.7 | 89 | 92 | 83 | c | 37.6 | 40.5 | 93 | 94 | 88 | d | 35.7 | 30.3 | 90 | 79 | 93 |
|
Table 3. Statistics of cloud detection accuracy of our algorithm