• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 57, Issue 3, 030003 (2020)
Bing Guan*, Shibin Li**, Ligang Zhang, and Shuangqing Chen
Author Affiliations
  • College of Petroleum Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163318, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP57.030003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Bing Guan, Shibin Li, Ligang Zhang, Shuangqing Chen. Review on Influencing Factors of Laser Rock Drilling Technology[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(3): 030003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Effects of laser irradiation time on SE and ROP for limestone[29]
    Fig. 1. Effects of laser irradiation time on SE and ROP for limestone[29]
    Effects of laser power on SE and ROP for limestone[29]
    Fig. 2. Effects of laser power on SE and ROP for limestone[29]
    Change trends of SE with increasing numbers of bursts per spot under different relaxation time[40]
    Fig. 3. Change trends of SE with increasing numbers of bursts per spot under different relaxation time[40]
    Different configuration of multiple overlapping laser beam spots[3]. (a) Overlapping of laser beams; (b) hexagonal overlap
    Fig. 4. Different configuration of multiple overlapping laser beam spots[3]. (a) Overlapping of laser beams; (b) hexagonal overlap
    SE needed for laser rock breaking at different parameter combinations in L9 orthogonal array experimental layout[28]
    Fig. 5. SE needed for laser rock breaking at different parameter combinations in L9 orthogonal array experimental layout[28]
    SE needed for laser rock breaking obtained by numerical simulation and experimental test [31,47]
    Fig. 6. SE needed for laser rock breaking obtained by numerical simulation and experimental test [31,47]
    SE for limestone with different saturated fluids by laser radiation [20]
    Fig. 7. SE for limestone with different saturated fluids by laser radiation [20]
    SE for dry and water saturated concrete samples by laser radiation[49]
    Fig. 8. SE for dry and water saturated concrete samples by laser radiation[49]
    Effects of deposition orientations of limestone and sandstone samples on SE[29]
    Fig. 9. Effects of deposition orientations of limestone and sandstone samples on SE[29]
    Reationship between medium depth and remove quality of rock[11]
    Fig. 10. Reationship between medium depth and remove quality of rock[11]
    SE and volume removed variation against tri-axial pressure conditions for limestone by laser radiation[51]
    Fig. 11. SE and volume removed variation against tri-axial pressure conditions for limestone by laser radiation[51]
    SE variation against confining pressure and hydraulic pressure for limestone by laser radiation[15]
    Fig. 12. SE variation against confining pressure and hydraulic pressure for limestone by laser radiation[15]
    Linear tracks produced with changed (top) and fixed (bottom) purging gas position[9]
    Fig. 13. Linear tracks produced with changed (top) and fixed (bottom) purging gas position[9]
    Holes obtained at side blowing and coaxial blowing[52]
    Fig. 14. Holes obtained at side blowing and coaxial blowing[52]
    Effect of incident angle on laser perforation morphology for sandstone[54].(a)0°; (b) 60°; (c) 70°; (d) 75°
    Fig. 15. Effect of incident angle on laser perforation morphology for sandstone[54].(a)0°; (b) 60°; (c) 70°; (d) 75°
    Thin section of penetrated hole in limestone[14]. (a) Fix perforation; (b) moving perforation
    Fig. 16. Thin section of penetrated hole in limestone[14]. (a) Fix perforation; (b) moving perforation
    Bing Guan, Shibin Li, Ligang Zhang, Shuangqing Chen. Review on Influencing Factors of Laser Rock Drilling Technology[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(3): 030003
    Download Citation