Author Affiliations
1School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China2Gansu Research Center of Automation Engineering Technology for Industry & Transportation, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China;3School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Diagram of handover model
Fig. 2. Chart of handover
Fig. 3. Diagram of measurement filtering process
Fig. 4. Diagram of measurement period Tm and reporting period Tu
Fig. 5. Fitting effect of concave variation sequence
Fig. 6. Fitting effect of convex variation sequence
Fig. 7. Fitting effect of monotonic augmentation sequence
Fig. 8. Fitting effect of monotonic subtraction sequence
Fig. 9. Flowchart of improved algorithm
Fig. 10. RSRP of traditional A3 algorithm
Fig. 11. RSRP of improved algorithm
Fig. 12. Comparison of occurrence times of ping-pong switching of three algorithms
Fig. 13. Comparison of ping-pong switching trigger rates of various algorithms
Fig. 14. Comparison of switching success rates of three algorithms
Parameter | Value |
---|
Bandwidth /MHz | 20 | Carrier frequency /GHz | 2.6 | Launching power ofbase station /dBm | 43 | Path loss model /dB | 140.729+34.768×lg R-10.03 | Standard deviation ofGaussian shadow model /dB | 8 | Vertical distance frombase station to rail /m | 100 | Cell radius R /km | 1.6 | Cell overlap area /m2 | 500 | Switching trigger threshold /dB | 3 | Trigger delay time /ms | 480 | UE speed /(km·h-1) | 120,250,350 |
|
Table 1. Simulation configuration table