• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 39, Issue 8, 0815006 (2019)
Rongrong Lu1、2、3、4、5、**, Feng Zhu1、2、4、5、*, Qingxiao Wu1、2、4、5, Foji Chen1、2、3、4、5, Yunge Cui1、2、3、4、5, and Yanzi Kong1、2、3、4、5
Author Affiliations
  • 1 Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China
  • 2 Institutes for Robotics and Intelligent Manufacturing, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China
  • 3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 4 Key Laboratory of Opto-Electronic Information Process, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China
  • 5 Key Laboratory of Image Understanding and Computer Vision, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201939.0815006 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Rongrong Lu, Feng Zhu, Qingxiao Wu, Foji Chen, Yunge Cui, Yanzi Kong. Three-Dimensional Object Recognition Based on Enhanced Point Pair Features[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(8): 0815006 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of ambiguity of original point pair feature. (a) Front view; (b) side view
    Fig. 1. Schematic of ambiguity of original point pair feature. (a) Front view; (b) side view
    Visible constraint between viewpoints. (a) Schematic of visible constraint between two points; (b) 3D model; (c) 2.5D scene
    Fig. 2. Visible constraint between viewpoints. (a) Schematic of visible constraint between two points; (b) 3D model; (c) 2.5D scene
    Viewpoint visibility constraint. (a) Location of point p; (b) variations in distribution and number of points satisfying visible constraint with point p with θ
    Fig. 3. Viewpoint visibility constraint. (a) Location of point p; (b) variations in distribution and number of points satisfying visible constraint with point p with θ
    Flow chart of 3D object recognition based on enhanced point pair feature
    Fig. 4. Flow chart of 3D object recognition based on enhanced point pair feature
    Dataset collected in practice. (a) Glass box and mouse model; (b) dataset R1; (c) dataset R2; (d) dataset R3
    Fig. 5. Dataset collected in practice. (a) Glass box and mouse model; (b) dataset R1; (c) dataset R2; (d) dataset R3
    Five models and two sample scenes of UWA dataset
    Fig. 6. Five models and two sample scenes of UWA dataset
    Recognition results of eight scenes on R1 dataset
    Fig. 7. Recognition results of eight scenes on R1 dataset
    Time cost comparison between EPPF and original PPF based methods on R1 dataset
    Fig. 8. Time cost comparison between EPPF and original PPF based methods on R1 dataset
    Recognition results of four scenes S1-S4 on R2 dataset
    Fig. 9. Recognition results of four scenes S1-S4 on R2 dataset
    Time cost comparison on R2 dataset. (a) EPPF; (b) original PPF
    Fig. 10. Time cost comparison on R2 dataset. (a) EPPF; (b) original PPF
    Recognition results of five scenes S1-S5 on R3 dataset
    Fig. 11. Recognition results of five scenes S1-S5 on R3 dataset
    Time cost comparison on R3 dataset. (a) EPPF; (b) original PPF
    Fig. 12. Time cost comparison on R3 dataset. (a) EPPF; (b) original PPF
    ModelPoint numberOriginal PPFEnhanced PPF
    NumberTime cost /sNumberTime cost /s
    Chef33511122585085.10555742234.70
    Chicken2643698280644.00343495818.90
    Para2507628254243.20311446817.50
    T-rex2337545923235.90271320214.80
    Glass Box113412848223.946386221.87
    Mouse135818428066.169165922.96
    Table 1. Summary of basic information of six target models
    ModelCorrect number/total numberFailed scene numberOcclusion of the targets /%
    Chef49/504391.30
    Chicken45/486,26,3289.70,86.50,89.50
    Parasaurolophus40/457,10,38,41,5086.40,91.40,89.00,87.00,83.90
    T-rex41/454,10,34,4884.00,80.20,83.80,77.30
    Average175/188 (93.1%)--
    Table 2. Recognition results of proposed algorithm on whole UWA dataset
    AlgorithmRecognition rate /%Time cost for one object /s
    Proposed97.610
    PPF in Ref. [8]97.085
    Table 3. Comparison of two algorithms on the UWA dataset (occlusion of targets is less than 84%) in terms of recognition rate
    Rongrong Lu, Feng Zhu, Qingxiao Wu, Foji Chen, Yunge Cui, Yanzi Kong. Three-Dimensional Object Recognition Based on Enhanced Point Pair Features[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(8): 0815006
    Download Citation