• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 8, 0810005 (2021)
Tibo Zha, Lin Luo, Kai Yang*, Yu Zhang, and Jinlong Li
Author Affiliations
  • School of Physical Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.0810005 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Tibo Zha, Lin Luo, Kai Yang, Yu Zhang, Jinlong Li. Image Reconstruction Algorithm Based on Improved Super-Resolution Generative Adversarial Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(8): 0810005 Copy Citation Text show less
    Structure of the generator
    Fig. 1. Structure of the generator
    Network structure after removing the BN layer
    Fig. 2. Network structure after removing the BN layer
    Structure of the RRDB
    Fig. 3. Structure of the RRDB
    Structure of the discriminator
    Fig. 4. Structure of the discriminator
    Schematic diagram of the training process. (a) Actual training curve; (b) ideal training curve[16]
    Fig. 5. Schematic diagram of the training process. (a) Actual training curve; (b) ideal training curve[16]
    Training environment of the network
    Fig. 6. Training environment of the network
    Interface of the MOI test system
    Fig. 7. Interface of the MOI test system
    PSNR of different algorithms in the Set5 test set
    Fig. 8. PSNR of different algorithms in the Set5 test set
    SSIM of different algorithms on the Set5 test set
    Fig. 9. SSIM of different algorithms on the Set5 test set
    PSNR of different algorithms on the Set14 test set
    Fig. 10. PSNR of different algorithms on the Set14 test set
    SSIM of different algorithms in the Set14 test set
    Fig. 11. SSIM of different algorithms in the Set14 test set
    Reconstruction effects of two algorithms. (a) Original image; (b) SRGAN algorithm; (c) our algorithm
    Fig. 12. Reconstruction effects of two algorithms. (a) Original image; (b) SRGAN algorithm; (c) our algorithm
    Reconstruction results of 5 different algorithms. (a) Overall original image; (b) bicubic interpolation algorithm;(c) SRCNN algorithm; (d) VDSR algorithm; (e) SRResNet algorithm; (f) our algorithm; (g) partial original image
    Fig. 13. Reconstruction results of 5 different algorithms. (a) Overall original image; (b) bicubic interpolation algorithm;(c) SRCNN algorithm; (d) VDSR algorithm; (e) SRResNet algorithm; (f) our algorithm; (g) partial original image
    Railroad track image reconstructed by 5 different algorithms. (a) Overall original image; (b) bicubic interpolation algorithm; (c) SRCNN algorithm; (d) VDSR algorithm; (e) SRResNet algorithm; (f) our algorithm; (g) partial original image
    Fig. 14. Railroad track image reconstructed by 5 different algorithms. (a) Overall original image; (b) bicubic interpolation algorithm; (c) SRCNN algorithm; (d) VDSR algorithm; (e) SRResNet algorithm; (f) our algorithm; (g) partial original image
    Evaluation standardScore
    No change in image quality5
    Slight change in image quality can be seen4
    Slightly hinder viewing3
    Hinder viewing2
    Seriously obstructing viewing1
    Table 1. Evaluation standard of the image quality
    Relative measurement scaleScore
    Quality is the worst in this picture group1
    Quality is below average in this picture group2
    Quality is on average in this picture group3
    Quality is above average in this picture group4
    Quality is the best in this picture group5
    Table 2. Scoring table for subjective evaluation of image quality
    AlgorithmSRGAN[13]OursDifference
    PSNR/dB28.7429.60↑0.86
    SSIM0.84350.8558↑0.0123
    Table 3. Test results of different algorithms on the Set5 data set
    AlgorithmSRGAN[13]OursDifference
    PSNR/dB25.7526.44↑0.69
    SSIM0.73700.7460↑0.0090
    Table 4. Test results of different algorithms on the Set14 data set
    AlgorithmSRGAN[13]OursDifference
    PSNR/dB24.6525.55↑0.90
    SSIM0.65020.6549↑0.0047
    Table 5. Test results of different algorithms on the BSD100 data set
    Data setSRGAN(with BN)Ours(with BN)SRGAN(without BN)Ours(without BN)
    PSNR /dBSSIMTime /sPSNR /dBSSIMTime /sPSNR /dBSSIMTime /sPSNR /dBSSIMTime /s
    Set528.690.84150.2129.020.84890.2029.250.84830.2029.600.85470.18
    Set1424.960.71870.4326.100.72330.3925.670.72030.4226.410.73980.38
    BSD10024.010.64880.4525.150.65110.4325.100.65030.4425.520.65480.41
    Table 6. Influence of BN layer on algorithm performance
    DatasetAlgorithmBicubicSRCNN[2]VDSR[5]SRResNet[13]Ours
    PSNR /dB28.4330.1431.3531.9229.60
    Set5SSIM0.82110.86470.88380.89980.8558
    MOI1.442.43.183.284.66
    PSNR /dB25.9927.1828.0128.3926.44
    Set14SSIM0.74860.78610.76740.81160.746
    MOI1.422.433.183.594.38
    PSNR /dB25.9626.927.2927.5225.55
    BSD100SSIM0.66750.71010.72510.76030.6549
    MOI1.362.453.23.574.42
    Table 7. Performance of different algorithms under three data sets
    Tibo Zha, Lin Luo, Kai Yang, Yu Zhang, Jinlong Li. Image Reconstruction Algorithm Based on Improved Super-Resolution Generative Adversarial Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(8): 0810005
    Download Citation