Xiaoling Ji, Yu Deng. Research progress on self-focusing effect of high-power laser beams propagating in inhomogeneous atmosphere[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33(8): 081002

Search by keywords or author
- High Power Laser and Particle Beams
- Vol. 33, Issue 8, 081002 (2021)
![Diagram of high-power laser beam propagating upwards in atmosphere[24]](/richHtml/qjglzs/2021/33/8/081002/img_1.jpg)
Fig. 1. Diagram of high-power laser beam propagating upwards in atmosphere[24]
![Confirmation of Eq. (4). Modified beam width wmod versus propagation distance z. Dashed curves: by Eq. (4); solid curves: by numerical simulation[24]](/richHtml/qjglzs/2021/33/8/081002/img_2.jpg)
Fig. 2. Confirmation of Eq. (4). Modified beam width w mod versus propagation distance z . Dashed curves: by Eq. (4); solid curves: by numerical simulation[24]
![Confirmation of Eq. (7). Beam width wtar ontarget versus relative power P/PcrGs[25]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
![Beam width w versus the propagation distance z. Dashed lines: linear propagation in free space; Solid lines: nonlinear propagation in the atmosphere[23]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 4. Beam width w versus the propagation distance z . Dashed lines: linear propagation in free space; Solid lines: nonlinear propagation in the atmosphere[23]
![Relative pulse width T/T0 versus propagation distance z[21]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
![Intensity distributions I(x, y = 0, z) versus altitude z[33]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
![Normalized intensity distributions I/I0 on debris target[21]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
![Intensity distribution I(r, z)versus propagation distance z. Uniform irradiation on debris target[22]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 8. Intensity distribution I (r , z )versus propagation distance z . Uniform irradiation on debris target[22]
![(a) Intensity distribution I(r, z) and (b) phase distribution Ф(r, z) at the exit of the atmosphere, (c) relative intensity distribution I(r, z)/Ipeak on the target[22]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 9. (a) Intensity distribution I (r , z ) and (b) phase distribution Ф (r , z ) at the exit of the atmosphere, (c) relative intensity distribution I (r , z )/I peak on the target[22]
![Intensity distributions for different values of obscure ratio ε on ground[33]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
![Comparison of intensity distributions on debris target[21]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 11. Comparison of intensity distributions on debris target[21]
![Beam width wtar on target versus focal length F[25]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
![Beam width on target versus wavelength λ[25]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
![Optimal wavelength λopt versus lg(C0) and σ0[25]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
![Phase distribution [24]相位分布[24]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
![Intensity distribution I(x, y, z) at different propagation distance z[24]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
![With PC, intensity distribution I(x, y, z) at different propagation distance z[24]](/Images/icon/loading.gif)

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address