Author Affiliations
1Department of Electrical Engineering, Electro-Optical Communications, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands2Tektronix AB, Kista, Sweden3GoMeasure ApS, Albertslund, Denmarkshow less
Fig. 1. Hybrid optical/mm-wave access network with beamforming capabilities. CO, central office; MCF, multi-core fiber; RAU, radio access unit.
Fig. 2. Principle of optical true time delay beamforming in a linear phased antenna array.
Fig. 3. Experimental setup. CO, central office; RAU, radio access unit; CW, continuous wave; PC, polarization controller; VSG, vector signal generator; RF, radio frequency; MZM, Mach–Zehnder modulator; EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier; AWG, arbitrary waveform generator; NRZ, non-return-to-zero; VOA, variable optical attenuator; OTDL, optical time delay line; MCF, multi-core fiber; PD, photodiode. (a) Beamformer network. (b) PD array. (c) Captured signals.
Fig. 4. Experimental demonstration of proposed OTTD beamforming scheme in four scenarios: Δτ=−1/4fc, Δτ=0, Δτ=1/4fc, and Δτ=1/2fc.
Fig. 5. Delay variation with time in four scenarios: Δτ=−1/4fc, τ=0, Δτ=1/4fc, and Δτ=1/2fc.
Fig. 6. Eye diagrams of demodulated signals.
Core | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|
Insertion loss (dB) | 3.1 | 5.3 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 4.7 | 4.0 | Cross-talk (dB) | | | | | | | |
|
Table 1. Measured Insertion Loss and Cross-talk at 1550 nm for the Seven-core Fiber
Beamforming Network Delay (ps) | Average Delay (ps) | Absolute Error | Standard Deviation | Maximum Deviation |
---|
| | 0.18 ps/1.03° | 0.11 ps/0.63° | 0.48 ps/2.75° | 0 | 0.10 | 0.10 ps/0.57° | 0.14 ps/0.80° | 0.40 ps/2.29° | 5 | 4.66 | 0.34 ps/1.95° | 0.12 ps/0.69° | 0.46 ps/2.64° | 10 | 10.20 | 0.20 ps/1.15° | 0.13 ps/0.74° | 0.50 ps/2.87° |
|
Table 2. Measured Results of Delay Between Two Channels