• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 47, Issue 2, 207003 (2020)
Zhang Pengfei1、*, Zhang Tingwei2, Song Weiye3, Lu Yiming4, and Jian Yifan5
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA
  • 2Biomedical Engineering Department, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA
  • 3School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA 0 2118, USA
  • 4Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA
  • 5Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL202047.0207003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zhang Pengfei, Zhang Tingwei, Song Weiye, Lu Yiming, Jian Yifan. Review of Advances in Ophthalmic Optical Imaging Technologies from Several Mouse Retinal Imaging Methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2020, 47(2): 207003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Comparison between human eyeball and mouse eyeball. (a) Diagram of a human eye[21]; (b) diagram of a mouse eye[21]; (c) fundus image for human retina[22]; (d) fundus image for mouse retina[23]; (e) histology slice of a mouse retina
    Fig. 1. Comparison between human eyeball and mouse eyeball. (a) Diagram of a human eye[21]; (b) diagram of a mouse eye[21]; (c) fundus image for human retina[22]; (d) fundus image for mouse retina[23]; (e) histology slice of a mouse retina
    In vivo imaging of mouse retina and the ways to avoid cataract. (a) Mouse under anesthesia[23]; (b) one type of contact lens with flat front surface and concave back surface[29]; (c) one type of contact lens with same curvature for both front and back surfaces[30]; (d) one type of contact lens with flexible contact surface[<xref ref-typ
    Fig. 2. In vivo imaging of mouse retina and the ways to avoid cataract. (a) Mouse under anesthesia[23]; (b) one type of contact lens with flat front surface and concave back surface[29]; (c) one type of contact lens with same curvature for both front and back surfaces[30]; (d) one type of contact lens with flexible contact surface[
    Three common retina in vivo optical imaging methods distinguished by the input and output optical path on the pupil. (a) Possible input and output light path locations related to the pupil; (b) fundus camera; (c) scanning laser ophthalmoscope; (d) optical coherence tomography
    Fig. 3. Three common retina in vivo optical imaging methods distinguished by the input and output optical path on the pupil. (a) Possible input and output light path locations related to the pupil; (b) fundus camera; (c) scanning laser ophthalmoscope; (d) optical coherence tomography
    Representative mouse retina pictures obtained by three common optical imaging methods. (a)--(d) Fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, large-field (50°) fluorescence labeled ganglion cells, and digital zoom-in ganglion cell image, respectively[23]; (e)--(g) back-reflection, fluorescein angiography, and zoom-in scan of fluorescein angiography, respectively[23]; (h) ganglion cell image from SL
    Fig. 4. Representative mouse retina pictures obtained by three common optical imaging methods. (a)--(d) Fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, large-field (50°) fluorescence labeled ganglion cells, and digital zoom-in ganglion cell image, respectively[23]; (e)--(g) back-reflection, fluorescein angiography, and zoom-in scan of fluorescein angiography, respectively[23]; (h) ganglion cell image from SL
    Effect of visual aberration on imaging, and two adaptive optics aberration correction methods. (a) Effect of used pupil size on imaging. For simplicity, only the output beam through scattering of retina is considered. When the beam occupies small percentage of the pupil, the aberration has a little effect on the PSFA. When larger pupil is used, more aberration will be introduced, resulting in blurred imaging; (b) adaptive optics system based on Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWS) f
    Fig. 5. Effect of visual aberration on imaging, and two adaptive optics aberration correction methods. (a) Effect of used pupil size on imaging. For simplicity, only the output beam through scattering of retina is considered. When the beam occupies small percentage of the pupil, the aberration has a little effect on the PSFA. When larger pupil is used, more aberration will be introduced, resulting in blurred imaging; (b) adaptive optics system based on Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWS) f
    Represented AO-SLO images of the mouse retina. (a)(b) Images of photoreceptors under two different amplifications[19,30]; (c)--(e) slicing diagram using the back-refection light imaging: different structures in the same lateral location but with different depths[19]; (f)--(h) slicing diagram of fluorescence imaging: the same ganglion cell with different imagi
    Fig. 6. Represented AO-SLO images of the mouse retina. (a)(b) Images of photoreceptors under two different amplifications[19,30]; (c)--(e) slicing diagram using the back-refection light imaging: different structures in the same lateral location but with different depths[19]; (f)--(h) slicing diagram of fluorescence imaging: the same ganglion cell with different imagi
    AO-SLO blood vessel imaging, blood flow measurement, and two new imaging techniques. (a) Two scanning patterns for imaging (single arrow) and blood flow measurement (double-headed arrow) based on AO-SLO[31]; (b) blood vessel imaging[31]; (c) space-time image of blood flow signal when the longitudinal scanning position is fixed at one point of blood vessel image. The blood flow speed can be calcula
    Fig. 7. AO-SLO blood vessel imaging, blood flow measurement, and two new imaging techniques. (a) Two scanning patterns for imaging (single arrow) and blood flow measurement (double-headed arrow) based on AO-SLO[31]; (b) blood vessel imaging[31]; (c) space-time image of blood flow signal when the longitudinal scanning position is fixed at one point of blood vessel image. The blood flow speed can be calcula
    Mouse retina optical multimodal imaging based on WFSL-AO. Along with the searching process, (a) the image brightness is increasing, (b) the wavefront aberration is decreasing, and (c) the images before and after optimization are compared[97]; (d) back reflection (red represents blood vessels and nerve fiber bundles) and fluorescence (green represents ganglion cell) composited SLO images, (e) fluorescence-labeled microglia cells, and (f) angiograp
    Fig. 8. Mouse retina optical multimodal imaging based on WFSL-AO. Along with the searching process, (a) the image brightness is increasing, (b) the wavefront aberration is decreasing, and (c) the images before and after optimization are compared[97]; (d) back reflection (red represents blood vessels and nerve fiber bundles) and fluorescence (green represents ganglion cell) composited SLO images, (e) fluorescence-labeled microglia cells, and (f) angiograp
    Oblique laser scanning ophthalmoscopy[110-111]. (a) Imaging principle: the incoming light comes into one side of the pupil, and the scattering light comes out from the other side of the pupil. This oblique input makes the detector can detect depth information; (b) depth encoded 3D fluorescent angiography from a mouse retina; (c)(d) two cross-sectional images are exemplified along the vertical and horizonta
    Fig. 9. Oblique laser scanning ophthalmoscopy[110-111]. (a) Imaging principle: the incoming light comes into one side of the pupil, and the scattering light comes out from the other side of the pupil. This oblique input makes the detector can detect depth information; (b) depth encoded 3D fluorescent angiography from a mouse retina; (c)(d) two cross-sectional images are exemplified along the vertical and horizonta
    Visible light high-resolution structural imaging and retinal oximetry. Comparison between (a) NIR-OCT and (b) VIS-OCT with achromatization for imaging of macular area in the same eye [lateral and axial resolutions of Fig. 10(a) are 10 μm and 1.7 μm respectively, and lateral and axial resolutions of Fig. 10(b) are 15 μm and 4 μm respectively)[95]; (c) averaged VIS-OCT enab
    Fig. 10. Visible light high-resolution structural imaging and retinal oximetry. Comparison between (a) NIR-OCT and (b) VIS-OCT with achromatization for imaging of macular area in the same eye [lateral and axial resolutions of Fig. 10(a) are 10 μm and 1.7 μm respectively, and lateral and axial resolutions of Fig. 10(b) are 15 μm and 4 μm respectively)[95]; (c) averaged VIS-OCT enab
    Two different ways for suppressing the speckle noise in the living retina imaging. Passive: (a) acquiring the 3D data multi times in the same location and averaging after alignment; (b)--(d) the image changes in GCL with averaging times[145], and (e) its quantification result[145]; (f)(g) comparison between single and averaged OCTA images of the OPL layer for a mouse retina[<xref ref-type="
    Fig. 11. Two different ways for suppressing the speckle noise in the living retina imaging. Passive: (a) acquiring the 3D data multi times in the same location and averaging after alignment; (b)--(d) the image changes in GCL with averaging times[145], and (e) its quantification result[145]; (f)(g) comparison between single and averaged OCTA images of the OPL layer for a mouse retina[Download full size
    Studies of the retina function response to visible light stimulus. (a)(b) nm-level human retina responses to two different light stimulus patterns and (c) the corresponding precision measured result[165]; (d)--(g) intrinsic optical signal (IOS) measurement[168]: (d) differential image of IOS with 10-ms light stimulation at different time; (e) IOS curves for different retinal layers; (f) enlarged
    Fig. 12. Studies of the retina function response to visible light stimulus. (a)(b) nm-level human retina responses to two different light stimulus patterns and (c) the corresponding precision measured result[165]; (d)--(g) intrinsic optical signal (IOS) measurement[168]: (d) differential image of IOS with 10-ms light stimulation at different time; (e) IOS curves for different retinal layers; (f) enlarged
    Size of eyeball /mmFocal lengthin air /mmAverage retinathickness /mmSize ofdilated pupil /mmNumericalaperturePower needed tosection theretina (diopter)
    Human24.016.70.2580.180.7
    Mouse3.41.90.2220.4949.5
    Table 1. Comparison of several key parameters of mouse and human eyes[19-20]
    Zhang Pengfei, Zhang Tingwei, Song Weiye, Lu Yiming, Jian Yifan. Review of Advances in Ophthalmic Optical Imaging Technologies from Several Mouse Retinal Imaging Methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2020, 47(2): 207003
    Download Citation