• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 18, Issue 1, 010201 (2020)
Zhilei Xiao1、2, Wei Quan1、*, Songpo Xu1、2, Shaogang Yu1、2, Yanlan Wang1, Meng Zhao1、2, Mingzheng Wei1, Yu Zhou1、2, Xuanyang Lai1, Jing Chen3、4、**, and Xiaojun Liu1、***
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3HEDPS, Center for Applied Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100084, China
  • 4Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100088, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL202018.010201 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zhilei Xiao, Wei Quan, Songpo Xu, Shaogang Yu, Yanlan Wang, Meng Zhao, Mingzheng Wei, Yu Zhou, Xuanyang Lai, Jing Chen, Xiaojun Liu. Coulomb potential influence in the attoclock experimental scheme[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2020, 18(1): 010201 Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) Calculated PMD for Ar, which is obtained with the simpleman model. The inset shows the sketch of the EP laser field. The wavelength is 800 nm, the ellipticity is 0.7, and the laser intensity is 3×1014 W/cm2. (b) The calculated PMD with parameters identical to those of (a) except for the artificially introduced 100 as tunneling time delay. The inset picture is the corresponding photoelectron angular distribution. (c) Wavelength dependence of the offset angle calculated with the simpleman model, including the tunneling delay times of 50, 100, and 150 as, respectively. (d) The wavelength dependence of temporal offset Δt, which is extracted from the data in (c). See text for details.
    Fig. 1. (a) Calculated PMD for Ar, which is obtained with the simpleman model. The inset shows the sketch of the EP laser field. The wavelength is 800 nm, the ellipticity is 0.7, and the laser intensity is 3×1014W/cm2. (b) The calculated PMD with parameters identical to those of (a) except for the artificially introduced 100 as tunneling time delay. The inset picture is the corresponding photoelectron angular distribution. (c) Wavelength dependence of the offset angle calculated with the simpleman model, including the tunneling delay times of 50, 100, and 150 as, respectively. (d) The wavelength dependence of temporal offset Δt, which is extracted from the data in (c). See text for details.
    Calculated photoelectron angular distributions for Ar subject to an EP laser field with ellipticity of ε=0.7, based on the simpleman [(a) and (b)] and the semiclassical methods [(c) and (d)]. The tunneling delays are 0 as [(a) and (c)] and 50 as [(b) and (d)], respectively. The laser wavelength is 800 nm. The red lines indicate the angular distributions of photoelectron tunneling around the peak of the electric field envelope with a small interval of [3T-0.1 a.u., 3T+0.1 a.u.].
    Fig. 2. Calculated photoelectron angular distributions for Ar subject to an EP laser field with ellipticity of ε=0.7, based on the simpleman [(a) and (b)] and the semiclassical methods [(c) and (d)]. The tunneling delays are 0 as [(a) and (c)] and 50 as [(b) and (d)], respectively. The laser wavelength is 800 nm. The red lines indicate the angular distributions of photoelectron tunneling around the peak of the electric field envelope with a small interval of [3T-0.1 a.u., 3T+0.1 a.u.].
    (a) PMD for Ar calculated with the semiclassical model. The laser parameters are identical to those of Fig. 1(a). (b) Wavelength dependence of temporal offset extracted from the semiclassical calculations for Ar with the tunneling delay times of 0, 50, 100, and 150 as, respectively. (c) Wavelength dependence of the offset angle calculated with semiclassical model for both Ne and Ar, where no tunneling delay is included. (d) The corresponding wavelength dependence of the temporal offsets extracted from the data of Fig. 3(c) and their exponential fits. The difference between the fits for Ar and Ne is also shown in (d). See text for details.
    Fig. 3. (a) PMD for Ar calculated with the semiclassical model. The laser parameters are identical to those of Fig. 1(a). (b) Wavelength dependence of temporal offset extracted from the semiclassical calculations for Ar with the tunneling delay times of 0, 50, 100, and 150 as, respectively. (c) Wavelength dependence of the offset angle calculated with semiclassical model for both Ne and Ar, where no tunneling delay is included. (d) The corresponding wavelength dependence of the temporal offsets extracted from the data of Fig. 3(c) and their exponential fits. The difference between the fits for Ar and Ne is also shown in (d). See text for details.
    Wavelength dependence of the ratios of TOCP of Ne, Ar, and Kr over that of H. The semiclassical calculation results are presented with symbols, and the horizontal line fit is shown with dashed lines. The ionization potential dependence of the ratio for each atom is depicted in the inset, where the semiclassical calculation (SC) result extracted by the fit procedure is shown with red open squares, and the function of (2Ip)−3/2 is given with a black solid line.
    Fig. 4. Wavelength dependence of the ratios of TOCP of Ne, Ar, and Kr over that of H. The semiclassical calculation results are presented with symbols, and the horizontal line fit is shown with dashed lines. The ionization potential dependence of the ratio for each atom is depicted in the inset, where the semiclassical calculation (SC) result extracted by the fit procedure is shown with red open squares, and the function of (2Ip)3/2 is given with a black solid line.
    Zhilei Xiao, Wei Quan, Songpo Xu, Shaogang Yu, Yanlan Wang, Meng Zhao, Mingzheng Wei, Yu Zhou, Xuanyang Lai, Jing Chen, Xiaojun Liu. Coulomb potential influence in the attoclock experimental scheme[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2020, 18(1): 010201
    Download Citation