• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 39, Issue 12, 1211002 (2019)
Jiaming Zhang1、2, Cong Sun1、2, Tao Li1、2, and Yang Shang1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410073, China
  • 2Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Image Measurement and Vision Navigation, Changsha, Hunan 410073, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201939.1211002 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jiaming Zhang, Cong Sun, Tao Li, Yang Shang. Atmospheric Disturbance Elimination Method Based on Camera System Design[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(12): 1211002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Light pipe layout for “Yuan Wang” roll deformation angle measurement
    Fig. 1. Light pipe layout for “Yuan Wang” roll deformation angle measurement
    Atmospheric disturbance model
    Fig. 2. Atmospheric disturbance model
    Opposite view imaging system model
    Fig. 3. Opposite view imaging system model
    Plane mirror reflection imaging system
    Fig. 4. Plane mirror reflection imaging system
    Reprojection error of camera system calibration. (a) Camera 1; (b) camera 2
    Fig. 5. Reprojection error of camera system calibration. (a) Camera 1; (b) camera 2
    Raw data of experimental group and control group. (a) Experimental group of camera 1; (b) control group of camera 1; (c) experimental group of camera 2; (d) control group of camera 2
    Fig. 6. Raw data of experimental group and control group. (a) Experimental group of camera 1; (b) control group of camera 1; (c) experimental group of camera 2; (d) control group of camera 2
    CameraDistortion center (u0,v0) /pixelLens distortion (k1,k2,k3,p1,p2) /%
    Camera 1(454.4, 974.4)(-5.97×10-3, 7.93×10-2, -4.68×10-2, 1.96×10-2, -2.65×10-4)
    Camera 2(399.9, 969.7)(8.33×10-3, -2.35×10-2, -6.87×10-2, 4.77×10-3, -3.53×10-4)
    Table 1. Camera calibration results
    Camera(Ax,Ay,Az) /rad(Tx,Ty,Tz)
    Camera 1(1.551, 0.095, 0.246)(-19.053,70.374,1.201)
    Camera 2(-0.115, 0.149, -1.577)(43.081,-19.101,2.527)
    Table 2. Pose parameters of calibration plate with planar mirror resolving
    Camera(Ax,Ay,Az) /rad(Tx,Ty,Tz)
    Camera 1(-1.515,-0.055,0.047)(-99.702,179.014,860.905)
    Camera 2(-1.524,0.202,-0.049)(-0.493,-121.131,934.423)
    Table 3. Calculated pose parameters of control group
    Camera(Ax,Ay,Az) /rad(Tx,Ty,Tz)
    Camera 1(-1.515,-0.055,0.048)(-95.672,169.535,833.601)
    Camera 2(-1.525,0.204,-0.048)(-0.833,-115.622,-909.013)
    Table 4. Pose parameters calculated from experimental group data
    Camera(Ax,Ay,Az) /rad(Tx,Ty,Tz)
    Camera 1(-1.515,-0.054,0.048)(-99.082,178.890,859.223)
    Camera 2(-1.524,0.203,-0.048)(-0.603,-120.542,929.835)
    Table 5. Pose parameter optimization results calculated from experimental group data
    Data(Ax,Ay,Az) /(°)Distance error /%
    Initial data of experimental group(0.057,0.093,0.115)2.99
    Optimized data of experimental group(0.023,0.076,0.115)0.35
    Table 6. Comparison of initial solution results and optimization results of experimental group with results of control group
    Jiaming Zhang, Cong Sun, Tao Li, Yang Shang. Atmospheric Disturbance Elimination Method Based on Camera System Design[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(12): 1211002
    Download Citation