• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 55, Issue 5, 051409 (2018)
Tao Zhang* and Xijiang Chen
Author Affiliations
  • School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP55.051409 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Tao Zhang, Xijiang Chen. Bridge Amplitude Monitoring with Three-Dimensional Laser Scanning Technology[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018, 55(5): 051409 Copy Citation Text show less
    Included angle between laser beam vector and normal vector of the surface of the object
    Fig. 1. Included angle between laser beam vector and normal vector of the surface of the object
    Projection of semi-major axis and semi-minor axis of a laser spot on x, y, z coordinate
    Fig. 2. Projection of semi-major axis and semi-minor axis of a laser spot on x, y, z coordinate
    Deformation simulator
    Fig. 3. Deformation simulator
    Deformation of different distances and incidence angles
    Fig. 4. Deformation of different distances and incidence angles
    Histogram of point cloud error entropy. (a) Different distances; (b) different incidence angles
    Fig. 5. Histogram of point cloud error entropy. (a) Different distances; (b) different incidence angles
    Histogram of deformation monitoring indicators. (a) Different distances; (b) different incidence angles
    Fig. 6. Histogram of deformation monitoring indicators. (a) Different distances; (b) different incidence angles
    Ratio histogram of the number of extracted deformation points to the number of the total cloud points for all trials at different distances
    Fig. 7. Ratio histogram of the number of extracted deformation points to the number of the total cloud points for all trials at different distances
    Ratio histogram of the number of extracted deformation points to the number of the total cloud points for all trials at different incidence angles. (a) 5°, 15°, 25° and 35°; (b) 45°, 55°, 65° and 75°
    Fig. 8. Ratio histogram of the number of extracted deformation points to the number of the total cloud points for all trials at different incidence angles. (a) 5°, 15°, 25° and 35°; (b) 45°, 55°, 65° and 75°
    Bridge site and schematic diagrams of the original point cloud data obtained by scanning
    Fig. 9. Bridge site and schematic diagrams of the original point cloud data obtained by scanning
    Point cloud change of top part
    Fig. 10. Point cloud change of top part
    Point cloud change of upside part
    Fig. 11. Point cloud change of upside part
    Point cloud change of middle part
    Fig. 12. Point cloud change of middle part
    Point cloud change of right bottom part
    Fig. 13. Point cloud change of right bottom part
    Point cloud change of left bottom part
    Fig. 14. Point cloud change of left bottom part
    Point cloud change of stay-cables part
    Fig. 15. Point cloud change of stay-cables part
    Deformation monitoringindicators /mmDistance /m
    320
    440
    560
    680
    Table 1. Deformation monitoring indicators of different distances based on ratio of extracted deformation
    Deformation monitoringindicators /mmIncidence angle /(°)
    45
    515
    525
    635
    645
    -55
    -65
    -75
    Table 2. Deformation monitoring indicators of different incidence angles based on ratio of extracted deformation
    Deformation monitoringindicators /mRegion
    0.0120Top
    0.0120Upside
    0.0101Middle
    0.0080Right bottom
    0.0080Left bottom
    0.0125Stay-cable
    Table 3. Deformation monitoring indicators of different regions
    Tao Zhang, Xijiang Chen. Bridge Amplitude Monitoring with Three-Dimensional Laser Scanning Technology[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018, 55(5): 051409
    Download Citation