• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 38, Issue 11, 1111001 (2018)
Axin Fan1、*, Na Xu2、3、*, Tingfa Xu1、*, Xiuqing Hu2、3, Jihui Wang1, Yuqing He1, Jizhou Zhang1, Ronghua Wu2、3, and Hanlie Xu2、3
Author Affiliations
  • 1 Key Laboratory of Photoelectric Imaging Technology and System of Ministry of Education, School of Optics and Photonics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • 2 National Satellite Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China
  • 3 Key Laboratory of Radiometric Calibration and Validation for Environmental Satellites, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201838.1111001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Axin Fan, Na Xu, Tingfa Xu, Xiuqing Hu, Jihui Wang, Yuqing He, Jizhou Zhang, Ronghua Wu, Hanlie Xu. Identification and Normalization of Image Gain of FY-3A MERSI Shortwave Infrared Bands[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(11): 1111001 Copy Citation Text show less
    MERSI scan pattern
    Fig. 1. MERSI scan pattern
    Relation between daily variations of onboard calibration source targets and latitude and solar zenith angle at 2.13 μm. (a) SV; (b) VOC; (c) BB
    Fig. 2. Relation between daily variations of onboard calibration source targets and latitude and solar zenith angle at 2.13 μm. (a) SV; (b) VOC; (c) BB
    SV variation of 2.13 μm in 2012
    Fig. 3. SV variation of 2.13 μm in 2012
    Gain classification process and resultsat 1.64 μm. (a) Original jump SV; (b) sorted jump SV; (c) sorted SV ratio; (d) SV ratio classification
    Fig. 4. Gain classification process and resultsat 1.64 μm. (a) Original jump SV; (b) sorted jump SV; (c) sorted SV ratio; (d) SV ratio classification
    Normalized effect of SV at 1.64 and 2.13 μm during the lifetime. (a)(d) Daily average SV; (b)(e) normalized results using theoretical levels; (c)(f) normalized results using actual levels
    Fig. 5. Normalized effect of SV at 1.64 and 2.13 μm during the lifetime. (a)(d) Daily average SV; (b)(e) normalized results using theoretical levels; (c)(f) normalized results using actual levels
    Normalized effect of onboard calibration source targets at 2.13 μm on August 24, 2012. Panels (a)(c)(e) SV, VOC, BB before normalization using actual levels; (b)(d)(f) SV, VOC, BB after normalization using actual levels
    Fig. 6. Normalized effect of onboard calibration source targets at 2.13 μm on August 24, 2012. Panels (a)(c)(e) SV, VOC, BB before normalization using actual levels; (b)(d)(f) SV, VOC, BB after normalization using actual levels
    Normalized effect of EV images (a)(b) at 1.64 μm on August 24, 2010 and (c)(d) at 2.13 μm on June 24, 2012
    Fig. 7. Normalized effect of EV images (a)(b) at 1.64 μm on August 24, 2010 and (c)(d) at 2.13 μm on June 24, 2012
    Threshold valueδ1δ2δ3δ4α
    Value0.060.091.50.030.002
    δ basisThe minimum variation of eight preset gain levels (1, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.43, 1.57, 1.7, and 1.87) is 0.076 and the maximum is 0.87.
    α basisThe average variation of non-polluted SV values of 2.13 μm is 0.002 from October 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
    Table 1. Threshold value and basis of automatic identification and gain classification
    DateTheoretical levelActual levelDateTheoretical levelActual level
    Before jumpAfter jumpBefore jumpAfter jumpBefore jumpAfter jumpBefore jumpAfter jump
    2009-03-021.01.11.001.092013-07-231.571.871.511.78
    2009-03-131.11.31.091.282013-07-291.871.431.781.39
    2009-05-291.31.871.281.782013-08-011.431.571.391.51
    2009-07-141.871.431.781.392013-08-021.571.871.511.78
    2009-08-171.431.571.391.512013-10-141.871.01.781.00
    2009-08-251.571.71.511.642014-02-241.01.11.001.09
    2009-08-261.71.871.641.782014-02-241.11.21.091.19
    2009-08-291.871.01.781.002014-02-251.21.31.191.28
    2009-09-061.01.11.001.092014-02-281.31.871.281.78
    2009-10-041.11.31.091.282014-02-281.871.01.781.00
    2009-10-091.31.431.281.392014-04-261.01.11.001.09
    2009-10-141.431.571.391.512014-04-271.11.21.091.19
    2009-10-301.571.71.511.642014-05-161.21.31.191.28
    2009-11-181.71.01.641.002014-05-211.31.431.281.39
    2010-03-061.01.11.001.092014-05-231.431.571.391.51
    2010-03-121.11.21.091.192014-05-231.571.871.511.78
    2010-03-291.21.31.191.282014-05-251.871.431.781.39
    2010-06-101.31.871.281.782014-05-261.431.571.391.51
    2010-08-241.871.01.781.002014-05-271.571.71.511.64
    2010-09-131.01.11.001.092014-05-291.71.871.641.78
    2012-03-181.11.21.091.192014-05-301.871.11.781.09
    2012-04-111.21.31.191.282014-05-311.11.21.091.19
    2012-05-221.31.01.281.002014-06-021.21.31.191.28
    2012-05-301.01.11.001.092014-06-051.31.431.281.39
    2012-06-241.11.31.091.282014-06-061.431.571.391.51
    2012-07-021.31.871.281.782014-06-061.571.71.511.64
    2012-07-041.871.01.781.002014-06-061.71.871.641.78
    2012-07-081.01.11.001.092014-06-101.871.01.781.00
    2012-08-221.11.21.091.192014-06-161.01.11.001.09
    2012-08-231.21.31.191.282014-06-281.11.21.091.19
    2012-08-241.31.431.281.392014-07-031.21.31.191.28
    2012-09-041.431.571.391.512014-07-031.31.871.281.78
    2012-09-091.571.871.511.782014-07-041.871.01.781.00
    2012-09-101.871.01.781.002014-07-061.01.11.001.09
    2012-10-291.01.11.001.092014-07-071.11.21.091.19
    2012-11-141.11.21.091.192014-07-121.21.31.191.28
    2012-12-311.21.31.191.282014-07-141.31.571.281.51
    2013-01-031.31.431.281.392014-07-151.571.71.511.64
    2013-01-051.431.571.391.512014-07-231.71.871.641.78
    2013-01-081.571.871.511.782014-07-241.871.431.781.39
    2013-01-151.871.01.781.002014-07-241.431.571.391.51
    2013-03-071.01.11.001.092014-07-241.571.71.511.64
    2013-06-141.11.31.091.282014-07-271.71.01.641.00
    2013-07-061.31.871.281.782014-07-291.01.11.001.09
    2013-07-201.871.431.781.392014-07-301.11.21.091.19
    2013-07-231.431.571.391.51
    Table 2. Detailed information of all gain jumps at 1.64 μm
    DateTheoretical levelActual levelDateTheoretical levelActual level
    Before jumpAfter jumpBefore jumpAfter jumpBefore jumpAfter jumpBefore jumpAfter jump
    2009-03-021.01.11.001.092012-04-111.01.11.001.09
    2009-08-241.11.31.091.262012-05-221.11.01.091.00
    2009-09-101.31.71.261.772012-06-201.01.11.001.09
    2009-10-301.71.01.771.002012-06-241.11.31.091.26
    2010-03-061.01.11.001.092012-08-241.31.871.261.77
    2010-03-121.11.21.091.162013-06-211.871.71.771.66
    2010-05-311.21.31.161.262013-07-291.71.871.661.77
    2010-08-241.31.71.261.772014-02-281.871.431.771.42
    2010-09-131.71.01.771.002014-04-261.431.571.421.56
    Table 3. Detailed information of all gain jumps at 2.13 μm
    LevelIndex12345678Average
    1.64 μmTheoretical1.01.11.21.31.431.571.71.87
    Actual1.001.091.191.281.391.511.641.78
    Deviation /%00.920.841.562.883.973.665.062.36
    2.13 μmTheoretical1.01.11.21.31.431.571.71.87
    Actual1.001.091.161.261.421.561.661.77
    Deviation /%00.923.453.170.700.642.415.652.12
    Table 4. Deviation between theoretical and actual levels at 1.64 μm and 2.13 μm
    Axin Fan, Na Xu, Tingfa Xu, Xiuqing Hu, Jihui Wang, Yuqing He, Jizhou Zhang, Ronghua Wu, Hanlie Xu. Identification and Normalization of Image Gain of FY-3A MERSI Shortwave Infrared Bands[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(11): 1111001
    Download Citation