Author Affiliations
1Key Laboratory of Infrared System Detection & Imaging Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China;2Chinese Academy of Sciences University, Beijing 100049, China3National Satellite Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Schematic of MAPI
Fig. 2. Multi-angle imaging principle of MAPI
Fig. 3. Relationship between incident angle and DOLP
Fig. 4. Micro-plane model
Fig. 5. Effect of wind speed on reflectance of sun glint
Fig. 6. Relationship between ρTOA and ξ
Fig. 7. Relationship between and ξ with different wind speeds
Fig. 8. Comparison of PTOA and Pre
Fig. 9. Comparison between observed DOLP and retrieved DOLP with different β. (a) β<6°;(b) β<7°
Fig. 10. DOLP of flare at 865 nm channel. (a) Observed DOLP of POLDER 3;(b) retrieved DOLP
Fig. 11. Comparison between observed DOLP of POLDER 3 and retrieved DOLP at different channels. (a) 865 nm; (b) 670 nm; (c) 490 nm
Fig. 12. DOLP of MAPI at 865 nm channel. (a) Observed DOLP of MAPI;(b) retrieved DOLP
Fig. 13. Comparison between MAPI observed DOLP and retrieved DOLP at different channels. (a) 865 nm; (b) 670 nm; (c) 490 nm
Channel | Central wavelength /mm | Polarization |
---|
B1 | 0.565 | Yes | B2 | 0.670 | Yes | B3 | 0.865 | Yes | B4 | 0.763 | No | B5 | 0.765 | No | B6 | 0.910 | No |
|
Table 1. Parameter setting of MAPI channels
Channel | Parameter | CMGC model | CMA model | BHGC model | BHA model |
---|
| Correlation coefficient | 0.965 | 0.966 | 0.965 | 0.966 | 865 nm | Intercept | 0.016 | 0.013 | 0.017 | 0.002 | | Slope | 0.946 | 0.937 | 0.942 | 0.987 | | Correlation coefficient | 0.947 | 0.947 | 0.947 | 0.948 | 670 nm | Intercept | 0.016 | 0.022 | 0.015 | 0.017 | | Slope | 0.924 | 0.926 | 0.925 | 0.929 | | Correlation coefficient | 0.929 | 0.927 | 0.928 | 0.927 | 490 nm | Intercept | -0.018 | -0.008 | -0.009 | -0.011 | | Slope | 1.042 | 1.052 | 1.043 | 1.062 |
|
Table 2. Evaluation results of four models
Channel | 865 nm | 670 nm | 565 nm |
---|
Hypothesisuncertainty /% | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.21 | Wind speeduncertainty /% | 1.18 | 1.18 | 1.19 | Water-leavingradiance uncertainty /% | 0 | 0.02 | 0.08 | Foam reflectanceuncertainty /% | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | Optical thicknessuncertainty /% | 0.79 | 0. 76 | 0. 76 | Synthetic uncertainty /% | 1.42 | 1.41 | 1.43 |
|
Table 4. Uncertainty of degree of polarization of three channels