• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 40, Issue 15, 1528002 (2020)
Yipeng Zhang1、2、*, Xiuqing Hu3、**, Dekui Yin1、***, and Mingjian Gu1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Infrared System Detection & Imaging Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China;
  • 2Chinese Academy of Sciences University, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3National Satellite Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202040.1528002 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yipeng Zhang, Xiuqing Hu, Dekui Yin, Mingjian Gu. Onboard Polarization Calibration Technique of Multi-Angle Polarization Imager Based on Sun Glint from Ocean[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(15): 1528002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of MAPI
    Fig. 1. Schematic of MAPI
    Multi-angle imaging principle of MAPI
    Fig. 2. Multi-angle imaging principle of MAPI
    Relationship between incident angle and DOLP
    Fig. 3. Relationship between incident angle and DOLP
    Micro-plane model
    Fig. 4. Micro-plane model
    Effect of wind speed on reflectance of sun glint
    Fig. 5. Effect of wind speed on reflectance of sun glint
    Relationship between ρTOA and ξ
    Fig. 6. Relationship between ρTOA and ξ
    Relationship between ρatm* and ξ with different wind speeds
    Fig. 7. Relationship between ρatm* and ξ with different wind speeds
    Comparison of PTOA and Pre
    Fig. 8. Comparison of PTOA and Pre
    Comparison between observed DOLP and retrieved DOLP with different β. (a) ββ<7°
    Fig. 9. Comparison between observed DOLP and retrieved DOLP with different β. (a) β<6°;(b) β<7°
    DOLP of flare at 865 nm channel. (a) Observed DOLP of POLDER 3;(b) retrieved DOLP
    Fig. 10. DOLP of flare at 865 nm channel. (a) Observed DOLP of POLDER 3;(b) retrieved DOLP
    Comparison between observed DOLP of POLDER 3 and retrieved DOLP at different channels. (a) 865 nm; (b) 670 nm; (c) 490 nm
    Fig. 11. Comparison between observed DOLP of POLDER 3 and retrieved DOLP at different channels. (a) 865 nm; (b) 670 nm; (c) 490 nm
    DOLP of MAPI at 865 nm channel. (a) Observed DOLP of MAPI;(b) retrieved DOLP
    Fig. 12. DOLP of MAPI at 865 nm channel. (a) Observed DOLP of MAPI;(b) retrieved DOLP
    Comparison between MAPI observed DOLP and retrieved DOLP at different channels. (a) 865 nm; (b) 670 nm; (c) 490 nm
    Fig. 13. Comparison between MAPI observed DOLP and retrieved DOLP at different channels. (a) 865 nm; (b) 670 nm; (c) 490 nm
    ChannelCentral wavelength /mmPolarization
    B10.565Yes
    B20.670Yes
    B30.865Yes
    B40.763No
    B50.765No
    B60.910No
    Table 1. Parameter setting of MAPI channels
    ChannelParameterCMGC modelCMA modelBHGC modelBHA model
    Correlation coefficient0.9650.9660.9650.966
    865 nmIntercept0.0160.0130.0170.002
    Slope0.9460.9370.9420.987
    Correlation coefficient0.9470.9470.9470.948
    670 nmIntercept0.0160.0220.0150.017
    Slope0.9240.9260.9250.929
    Correlation coefficient0.9290.9270.9280.927
    490 nmIntercept-0.018-0.008-0.009-0.011
    Slope1.0421.0521.0431.062
    Table 2. Evaluation results of four models
    Channel865 nm670 nm565 nm
    Hypothesisuncertainty /%0.110.140.21
    Wind speeduncertainty /%1.181.181.19
    Water-leavingradiance uncertainty /%00.020.08
    Foam reflectanceuncertainty /%0.010.010.01
    Optical thicknessuncertainty /%0.790. 760. 76
    Synthetic uncertainty /%1.421.411.43
    Table 4. Uncertainty of degree of polarization of three channels
    Yipeng Zhang, Xiuqing Hu, Dekui Yin, Mingjian Gu. Onboard Polarization Calibration Technique of Multi-Angle Polarization Imager Based on Sun Glint from Ocean[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(15): 1528002
    Download Citation