• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 9, Issue 8, 1462 (2021)
Andrey A. Machnev1、*, Anatoly P. Pushkarev2, Pavel Tonkaev2, Roman E. Noskov1, Kristina R. Rusimova3, Peter J. Mosley3, Sergey V. Makarov2, Pavel B. Ginzburg1、4, and Ivan I. Shishkin1、2、5
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Electrical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
  • 2Department of Physics and Engineering, ITMO University, Saint Petersburg 197101, Russia
  • 3Centre for Photonics and Photonic Materials, Department of Physics, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
  • 4Photonics and 2D Materials, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny 141700, Russia
  • 5e-mail: i.shishkin@metalab.ifmo.ru
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.422640 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Andrey A. Machnev, Anatoly P. Pushkarev, Pavel Tonkaev, Roman E. Noskov, Kristina R. Rusimova, Peter J. Mosley, Sergey V. Makarov, Pavel B. Ginzburg, Ivan I. Shishkin. Modifying light–matter interactions with perovskite nanocrystals inside antiresonant photonic crystal fiber[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(8): 1462 Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) Optical micrograph of an AR-PCF cross section. (b) Orientation-averaged Purcell enhancement map as a function of emitter position inside the fiber, obtained by the FEM simulations.
    Fig. 1. (a) Optical micrograph of an AR-PCF cross section. (b) Orientation-averaged Purcell enhancement map as a function of emitter position inside the fiber, obtained by the FEM simulations.
    Numerically calculated field distribution of (a) core LP01 and (b) cladding modes. Microphotographs of the output fiber facet, revealing coupling to (c) core mode and (d) cladding modes. Discrepancies between numerical results and experimentally observed distributions occur owing to multiple cladding modes’ interference.
    Fig. 2. Numerically calculated field distribution of (a) core LP01 and (b) cladding modes. Microphotographs of the output fiber facet, revealing coupling to (c) core mode and (d) cladding modes. Discrepancies between numerical results and experimentally observed distributions occur owing to multiple cladding modes’ interference.
    (a) SEM image of the inner fiber capillary. (b) Zoomed view of the capillary sidewall. (c) CLSM cross section of the fiber section. (d) 3D reconstruction of the CLSM data plotted as iso-intensity surfaces.
    Fig. 3. (a) SEM image of the inner fiber capillary. (b) Zoomed view of the capillary sidewall. (c) CLSM cross section of the fiber section. (d) 3D reconstruction of the CLSM data plotted as iso-intensity surfaces.
    (a) Schematic of the experimental setup. Filtered supercontinuum light source is coupled to a fiber under test. (b) Positions of the collection points in experiment (1) core, (2) ring, and (3) cladding.
    Fig. 4. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup. Filtered supercontinuum light source is coupled to a fiber under test. (b) Positions of the collection points in experiment (1) core, (2) ring, and (3) cladding.
    (a) Normalized photoluminescence spectra of perovskite quantum dots inside the AR-PCF. (b) Lifetimes of quantum dots drop-cast on clean glass coverslip (reference) and measured from the core of AR-PCF (core). (c) Lifetimes of perovskite dots coupled to cladding and to the core of fiber. (d) Lifetimes of perovskite dots coupled to the capillary compared to the core of the fiber.
    Fig. 5. (a) Normalized photoluminescence spectra of perovskite quantum dots inside the AR-PCF. (b) Lifetimes of quantum dots drop-cast on clean glass coverslip (reference) and measured from the core of AR-PCF (core). (c) Lifetimes of perovskite dots coupled to cladding and to the core of fiber. (d) Lifetimes of perovskite dots coupled to the capillary compared to the core of the fiber.
    τ1, nsτ2, nsτintensity, nsτamplitude, ns
    Reference1.8±0.16.9±0.263.752.51
    Core1.88±0.097.2±0.354.092.72
    Capillary0.77±0.054.55±0.142.811.4
    Cladding0.41±0.034.6±0.22.720.82
    Table 1. Summary on Lifetime Data Extracted from PL Decay Curves
    τintensity, nsP
    Reference3.75
    Core4.090.92
    Capillary2.811.33
    Cladding2.721.38
    Table 2. Purcell Factors for Different Modes of the Fiber
    Andrey A. Machnev, Anatoly P. Pushkarev, Pavel Tonkaev, Roman E. Noskov, Kristina R. Rusimova, Peter J. Mosley, Sergey V. Makarov, Pavel B. Ginzburg, Ivan I. Shishkin. Modifying light–matter interactions with perovskite nanocrystals inside antiresonant photonic crystal fiber[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(8): 1462
    Download Citation