Author Affiliations
1 Department of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China2 System Engineering Research Institute, China State Shipbuilding Corporation, Beijing 100094, China3 Institute of Ocean Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Diagram of interferometric fiber-optic detector based on heterodyne scheme
Fig. 2. Signal demodulation diagram in heterodyne scheme
Fig. 3. Theoretical and simulation results of THD versus signal amplitude. (a) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (b) fs=1 kHz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (c) fs=200 Hz, frep=400 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (d) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=25 kHz
Fig. 4. Theoretical and simulation results of maximum THD versus carrier phase bias. (a) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (b) fs=1 kHz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (c) fs=200 Hz, frep=400 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (d) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=25 kHz
Fig. 5. Theoretical and simulation results of RAE versus signal amplitude. (a) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (b) fs=1 kHz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (c) fs=200 Hz, frep=400 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (d) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=25 kHz
Fig. 6. Theoretical and simulation results of RAE versus carrier phase bias. (a) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (b) fs=1 kHz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (c) fs=200 Hz, frep=400 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (d) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=25 kHz
Fig. 7. Comparison of demodulation results with and without phase bias. (a) THD without phase bias; (b) THD with phase bias
Fig. 8. (a) THD versus phase bias; (b) RAE versus phase bias