• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 37, Issue 9, 0906001 (2017)
Fei Liu1, Han Yan2, Bo Hua2, Xiaoping Zheng1, and Min Zhang3、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1 Department of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • 2 System Engineering Research Institute, China State Shipbuilding Corporation, Beijing 100094, China
  • 3 Institute of Ocean Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201737.0906001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Fei Liu, Han Yan, Bo Hua, Xiaoping Zheng, Min Zhang. Effect of Carrier Phase Bias on Demodulation of Fiber-Optic Seismometer[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2017, 37(9): 0906001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Diagram of interferometric fiber-optic detector based on heterodyne scheme
    Fig. 1. Diagram of interferometric fiber-optic detector based on heterodyne scheme
    Signal demodulation diagram in heterodyne scheme
    Fig. 2. Signal demodulation diagram in heterodyne scheme
    Theoretical and simulation results of THD versus signal amplitude. (a) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (b) fs=1 kHz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (c) fs=200 Hz, frep=400 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (d) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=25 kHz
    Fig. 3. Theoretical and simulation results of THD versus signal amplitude. (a) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (b) fs=1 kHz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (c) fs=200 Hz, frep=400 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (d) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=25 kHz
    Theoretical and simulation results of maximum THD versus carrier phase bias. (a) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (b) fs=1 kHz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (c) fs=200 Hz, frep=400 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (d) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=25 kHz
    Fig. 4. Theoretical and simulation results of maximum THD versus carrier phase bias. (a) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (b) fs=1 kHz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (c) fs=200 Hz, frep=400 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (d) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=25 kHz
    Theoretical and simulation results of RAE versus signal amplitude. (a) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (b) fs=1 kHz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (c) fs=200 Hz, frep=400 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (d) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=25 kHz
    Fig. 5. Theoretical and simulation results of RAE versus signal amplitude. (a) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (b) fs=1 kHz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (c) fs=200 Hz, frep=400 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (d) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=25 kHz
    Theoretical and simulation results of RAE versus carrier phase bias. (a) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (b) fs=1 kHz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (c) fs=200 Hz, frep=400 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (d) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=25 kHz
    Fig. 6. Theoretical and simulation results of RAE versus carrier phase bias. (a) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (b) fs=1 kHz, frep=200 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (c) fs=200 Hz, frep=400 kHz, fc=50 kHz; (d) fs=200 Hz, frep=200 kHz, fc=25 kHz
    Comparison of demodulation results with and without phase bias. (a) THD without phase bias; (b) THD with phase bias
    Fig. 7. Comparison of demodulation results with and without phase bias. (a) THD without phase bias; (b) THD with phase bias
    (a) THD versus phase bias; (b) RAE versus phase bias
    Fig. 8. (a) THD versus phase bias; (b) RAE versus phase bias
    Fei Liu, Han Yan, Bo Hua, Xiaoping Zheng, Min Zhang. Effect of Carrier Phase Bias on Demodulation of Fiber-Optic Seismometer[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2017, 37(9): 0906001
    Download Citation