• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 40, Issue 21, 2111003 (2020)
Shaoen Wang1、2、3, Xiubin Yang1、3、*, Tingting Xu1、2、3, Jinliang Han1、2、3, Lin Chang1、3, and Wei Yue1、2、3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Space-Based Dynamic & Rapid Optical Imaging Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin 130033, China;
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin 130033, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202040.2111003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Shaoen Wang, Xiubin Yang, Tingting Xu, Jinliang Han, Lin Chang, Wei Yue. Instantaneous Image-Rotation Analysis for Dynamic Format Imaging of Space CMOS Camera[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(21): 2111003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Motion state of image in image plane imaging unit. (a) State of imaging units is isotropic; (b) state of imaging units is anisotropic
    Fig. 1. Motion state of image in image plane imaging unit. (a) State of imaging units is isotropic; (b) state of imaging units is anisotropic
    Instantaneous decomposition of camera dynamic format imaging process
    Fig. 2. Instantaneous decomposition of camera dynamic format imaging process
    Static model in camera dynamic imaging process
    Fig. 3. Static model in camera dynamic imaging process
    Reacquisition of imaging units
    Fig. 4. Reacquisition of imaging units
    Contour distribution map of ground resolution Reacquisition of imaging units
    Fig. 5. Contour distribution map of ground resolution Reacquisition of imaging units
    Simulation results of static imaging with different dynamic instantaneous attitude angles. (a) 25°; (b) 35°; (c) 45°
    Fig. 6. Simulation results of static imaging with different dynamic instantaneous attitude angles. (a) 25°; (b) 35°; (c) 45°
    Imaging area comparison
    Fig. 7. Imaging area comparison
    Imaging simulation results of different exposure time at 25°. (a) 0.01 ms; (b) 0.10 ms; (c) 1.00 ms; (d) 10.00 ms
    Fig. 8. Imaging simulation results of different exposure time at 25°. (a) 0.01 ms; (b) 0.10 ms; (c) 1.00 ms; (d) 10.00 ms
    Imaging simulation results of different exposure time at 45°. (a) 0.01 ms; (b) 0.10 ms; (c) 1.00 ms; (d) 10.00 ms
    Fig. 9. Imaging simulation results of different exposure time at 45°. (a) 0.01 ms; (b) 0.10 ms; (c) 1.00 ms; (d) 10.00 ms
    Change trend of PSNR and SSIM of different simulation results. (a) PSNR; (b) SSIM
    Fig. 10. Change trend of PSNR and SSIM of different simulation results. (a) PSNR; (b) SSIM
    Change trend of SNR of imaging system
    Fig. 11. Change trend of SNR of imaging system
    Parameter25°45°
    Exposure time /ms0.010.101.0010.000.010.101.0010.00
    Imaging width /pixel15232501
    Inside edge length /pixel11001406
    Outside edge length /pixel11061422
    Optical axis ground resolution /m4.46855.9580
    Difference in ground resolution /m0.02670.1142
    SNR /dB21.381731.452541.459651.460421.381731.452541.459651.4604
    PSNR /dB16.528616.528016.467614.783717.886017.926517.700911.6605
    SSIM0.72590.72570.40480.18970.75620.73460.35210.1972
    Table 1. Simulation results of different exposure time at dynamic instantaneous attitude angles of 25° and 45°
    Shaoen Wang, Xiubin Yang, Tingting Xu, Jinliang Han, Lin Chang, Wei Yue. Instantaneous Image-Rotation Analysis for Dynamic Format Imaging of Space CMOS Camera[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(21): 2111003
    Download Citation