Author Affiliations
1 School of Science, Chang'an University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710064, China2 School of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Hyperspectral images. (a) Category of real ground; (b) classification result of OMP algorithm; (c) spectral curves
Fig. 2. Clustering results of ground in the neighborhood. (a) (129,35); (b) (96,39); (c) (38,52); (d) (100,58)
Fig. 3. Contrast figures before and after algorithm correction. (a) Before correction; (b) after correction
Fig. 4. Classification results of Pavia University dataset obtained by different algorithms. (a) Original image; (b) real ground; (c) SVM algorithm; (d) CK-SVM algorithm; (e) OMP algorithm; (f) SOMP algorithm; (g) MASR algorithm; (h) SC-SOMP algorithm
Fig. 5. Classification results of Indian Pines dataset obtained by different algorithms. (a) Original image; (b) real ground; (c) SVM algorithm; (d) CK-SVM algorithm; (e) OMP algorithm; (f) SOMP algorithm; (g) MASR algorithm; (h) SC-SOMP algorithm
Fig. 6. Classification results of Salinas Valley dataset obtained by different algorithms. (a) Original image; (b) real ground; (c) SVM algorithm; (d) CK-SVM algorithm; (e) OMP algorithm; (f) SOMP algorithm; (g) MASR algorithm; (h) SC-SOMP algorithm
Fig. 7. Effect of the number of training samples. (a) Pavia University; (b) Indian Pines; (c) Salinas Valley
Class | Sample | Classification algorithm | |
---|
Train | | Test | SVM | CK-SVM | OMP | SOMP | MASR | SC-SOMP |
---|
Asphalt | 250 | 6381 | 80.50 | 97.90 | 49.72 | 66.27 | 77.26 | 91.87 | Meadows | 250 | 18339 | 84.48 | 98.95 | 62.36 | 92.32 | 96.62 | 99.11 | Gravel | 250 | 1849 | 78.91 | 93.77 | 63.00 | 96.76 | 99.18 | 99.78 | Trees | 250 | 2814 | 96.24 | 98.96 | 84.49 | 94.94 | 96.91 | 98.33 | Painted metal sheets | 250 | 1095 | 99.74 | 100.00 | 99.12 | 99.13 | 100.00 | 99.36 | Bare soil | 250 | 4779 | 83.96 | 97.06 | 54.12 | 92.73 | 98.74 | 100.00 | Bitumen | 250 | 1080 | 91.39 | 99.56 | 83.46 | 99.16 | 99.99 | 99.91 | Self-blocking bricks | 250 | 3432 | 81.27 | 96.44 | 62.27 | 90.06 | 96.18 | 98.08 | Shadows | 250 | 697 | 98.44 | 99.87 | 95.18 | 85.02 | 83.59 | 89.67 | OA /% | 84.98 | 98.16 | 63.55 | 88.77 | 93.86 | 98.03 | Kappa | 0.80 | 0.98 | 0.54 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 0.97 |
|
Table 1. Experimental data and classification accuracies of the Pavia University dataset
Class | Classification algorithm |
---|
SVM | CK-SVM | OMP | SOMP | MASK | SC-SOMP |
---|
OA /% | 77.64 | 94.86 | 61.01 | 90.88 | 98.41 | 98.37 | Kappa | 0.74 | 0.94 | 0.66 | 0.90 | 0.98 | 0.97 |
|
Table 2. Classification accuracies of Indian Pines dataset obtained by different algorithms
Class | Classification algorithm |
---|
SVM | CK-SVM | OMP | SOMP | MASR | SC-SOMP |
---|
OA /% | 86.29 | 94.56 | 82.17 | 88.81 | 88.04 | 98.34 | Kappa | 0.85 | 0.94 | 0.8 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.97 |
|
Table 3. Classification accuracies of Salinas Valley dataset obtained by different algorithms