• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 14, 1410012 (2021)
Xiaolong Chen1、*, Ji Zhao1、2, and Siyi Chen1、**
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Automation and Electronic Information, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan 411100, China
  • 2National CIMS Engineering Technology Research Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084,China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.1410012 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiaolong Chen, Ji Zhao, Siyi Chen. Lightweight Semantic Segmentation Network Based on Attention Coding[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(14): 1410012 Copy Citation Text show less
    Lightweight network based on attention coding
    Fig. 1. Lightweight network based on attention coding
    Structure of the APAM
    Fig. 2. Structure of the APAM
    Structure of the GAU module
    Fig. 3. Structure of the GAU module
    Segmentation results of different algorithms. (a) Original image; (b) real semantic label; (c) basic algorithm; (d) our algorithm
    Fig. 4. Segmentation results of different algorithms. (a) Original image; (b) real semantic label; (c) basic algorithm; (d) our algorithm
    AlgorithmBase sizemIoU /%
    Baseline--69.8
    Ours-13683.3
    Ours-24983.4
    Ours-36483.5
    Ours-48183.6
    Ours-510083.6
    Table 1. Influence of APAM basis set number on segmentation accuracy
    AlgorithmBase sizemIoU /%
    MHA[23]--59.95
    SGE[24]--58.90
    PAM--70.71
    CAM--70.53
    Ours(average)6470.99
    Ours(max)6469.93
    Table 2. Segmentation results of different attention modules
    CFLCFmIoU /%
    F1concat84.6
    F2concat83.2
    F3concat83.3
    F4concat81.4
    F4sum84.5
    F5sum84.9
    F6sum84.9
    Table 3. Structural analysis of the APAM
    AlgorithmGFLOPSParams /MMemory /GmIoU /%
    FCN216.054.07.769.8
    U-net262.234.58.770.8
    SegNet244.632.48.971.1
    DeepLab v2251.744.68.071.6
    PSP254.767.68.180.9
    DANet275.468.59.385.1
    Ours228.867.78.184.9
    Table 4. Performance parameters of different algorithms
    AlgorithmFCNDeepLab v2DPN[25]DeepLab v3+PSPResNet38[26]EncNet[27]Ours
    aero82.484.487.788.087.494.494.191.6
    bike47.454.559.456.356.372.969.257.9
    bird81.281.578.486.385.794.996.390.0
    boat68.663.664.969.479.468.876.785.5
    bottle75.365.970.372.273.878.486.282.5
    bus81.385.189.390.392.390.696.395.0
    car79.979.183.585.787.390.090.790.8
    cat81.683.486.189.692.392.194.294.0
    chair33.730.731.728.953.340.138.853.8
    cow68.474.179.985.990.490.490.793.7
    table52.359.862.659.375.271.773.378.0
    dog76.479.081.984.287.389.990.093.0
    horse64.976.180.080.285.993.792.591.4
    mbike73.483.283.584.283.891.088.887.1
    person81.280.882.382.884.589.187.988.2
    plant56.759.760.556.068.171.368.774.1
    sheep69.782.283.278.587.090.792.691.3
    sofa50.950.453.451.673.061.359.075.8
    train78.573.177.984.591.187.786.492.8
    tv70.163.765.069.671.578.173.480.6
    mIoU69.871.674.175.180.982.582.984.9
    Table 5. Classification results of different algorithms on the PASCAL VOC2012 validation set unit: %
    AlgorithmFCNPSPDenseASPP[28]DANetOurs
    road95.196.497.397.297.4
    sidewalk67.874.478.177.879.4
    building88.589.189.589.890.0
    wall50.552.956.056.157.0
    fence44.647.948.548.651.1
    pole35.639.940.340.843.5
    traffic light47.051.952.853.053.4
    Traffic sign60.462.465.365.266.5
    vegetation88.689.489.689.789.8
    terrain55.657.660.560.760.9
    sky91.492.092.392.492.7
    person68.870.471.471.972.8
    rider47.949.952.052.253.4
    car90.391.492.192.492.4
    truck73.873.983.082.879.3
    bus73.675.880.279.481.9
    train62.866.470.470.874.3
    motocycle51.755.058.458.958.6
    bicycle63.163.665.565.866.6
    mIoU66.268.470.770.871.6
    Table 6. Classification results of different algorithms on the Cityscapes validation set unit: %
    Xiaolong Chen, Ji Zhao, Siyi Chen. Lightweight Semantic Segmentation Network Based on Attention Coding[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(14): 1410012
    Download Citation