• Acta Optica Sinica (Online)
  • Vol. 1, Issue 4, 0414001 (2024)
Cong Liu1,2, Yu Wang1,2, Yuxin Zhang1,3, Sheng Chen4..., Wenbin Hu1,**, Jixiang Dai1 and Minghong Yang1,*|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1National Engineering Research Center of Fiber Optic Sensing Technology and Networks, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei , China
  • 2School of Information Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei , China
  • 3School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei , China
  • 4China Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute, Beijing 100029, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOSOL240445 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Cong Liu, Yu Wang, Yuxin Zhang, Sheng Chen, Wenbin Hu, Jixiang Dai, Minghong Yang. Progress in Optoelectronic Detection Technology for Safe Operation and Maintenance of Hydrogen Energy Storage and Transportation Equipment (Invited)[J]. Acta Optica Sinica (Online), 2024, 1(4): 0414001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of different types of electrical hydrogen sensors[4]. (a) Electrolytic sensor (electrical current type); (b) MOS sensor; (c) catalytic combustible sensor; (d) thermal conductivity sensor
    Fig. 1. Schematic of different types of electrical hydrogen sensors[4]. (a) Electrolytic sensor (electrical current type); (b) MOS sensor; (c) catalytic combustible sensor; (d) thermal conductivity sensor
    Performance of FBG sensor based on hydrogen absorption and exothermic properties. (a) Hydrogen response of FBG coated with Pt-loaded WO3[20]; (b) improvement of sensing performance by fabrication optimization based on metal-organic framework[21]
    Fig. 2. Performance of FBG sensor based on hydrogen absorption and exothermic properties. (a) Hydrogen response of FBG coated with Pt-loaded WO3[20]; (b) improvement of sensing performance by fabrication optimization based on metal-organic framework[21]
    FBG-based hydrogen sensing system with optic-heating assistance[24]. (a) Overall configuration; (b) schematic of sensing probe
    Fig. 3. FBG-based hydrogen sensing system with optic-heating assistance[24]. (a) Overall configuration; (b) schematic of sensing probe
    Optical sensing chip of hydrogen detection. (a) Based on surface plasmonic-catalytic effect[32]; (b) based on MZI effect[33]
    Fig. 4. Optical sensing chip of hydrogen detection. (a) Based on surface plasmonic-catalytic effect[32]; (b) based on MZI effect[33]
    Internal layouts of spherical detector
    Fig. 5. Internal layouts of spherical detector
    Buried pipeline leakage test[53]. (a) Schematic of pipeline and distribution of monitor points; (b) temperature change curves at monitor point #1‒3, #5, and #9; temperature change curves of cable (c) before and (d) after leakage
    Fig. 6. Buried pipeline leakage test[53]. (a) Schematic of pipeline and distribution of monitor points; (b) temperature change curves at monitor point #1‒3, #5, and #9; temperature change curves of cable (c) before and (d) after leakage
    Fiber helical wrapping structure and detection results in frequency domain[63]. (a) Schematic illustration of reference region (Zone 0) and monitored region (Zones 1‒3); (b) helical wrapping structure, where Ac stands for accelerometer; (c) detail photo of one of pipe segments; (d) overall averaged DAS signal spectra from Zone 2 under different pressures; (e) averaged signal spectra from accelerometer placed close to the leak (center) and the edge close to flange (end)
    Fig. 7. Fiber helical wrapping structure and detection results in frequency domain[63]. (a) Schematic illustration of reference region (Zone 0) and monitored region (Zones 1‒3); (b) helical wrapping structure, where Ac stands for accelerometer; (c) detail photo of one of pipe segments; (d) overall averaged DAS signal spectra from Zone 2 under different pressures; (e) averaged signal spectra from accelerometer placed close to the leak (center) and the edge close to flange (end)
    Classification of hydrogen energy storage and transportation equipment detection technology
    Fig. 8. Classification of hydrogen energy storage and transportation equipment detection technology
    Sensor typeSensing mechanismFeatureLimitation

    Electrical

    sensor

    ElectrochemicalAmperometricFast response; high sensitivityLeakage risk from liquid electrolyte
    Potentiometric5-6Solid electrolyte; low power consumption; room temperature operatingNonlinear response
    Metal oxide7ResistiveNearly linear response; MEMS-based miniaturization; wide range of combustible gasesHigh operating temperature (~400 ℃); oxygen required

    Catalytic

    combustion

    Temperature
    Thermal conduction4ResistiveLow power consumption down to milliwatts; oxygen-free environmentsEasily influenced by environmental parameters; cross-sensitivity
    Optical fiber sensorInterferometricAlloy film9High sensitivity to low concentrations; good repeatabilitySusceptible to external vibration and temperature variations; limitation on distributing sensing
    MZI10Simple design
    F-P11Fast response time; can be used for liquid hydrogen
    FBGExpansion12-14Quasi-distributed sensing; mature selection of materialsLimited sensitivity at low concentrations
    Exothermic19-21

    Quasi-distributed sensing;

    high stability

    Higher dependence on temperature; relatively longer response time
    With in-line light heating assistance15-16Improved sensing sensitivityHigh complexity and extra time-cost on timing defining of heating and sensing
    MicrolensTail-coatingSimple probe structure; easy to manufacture; high potential for commercialLimitation on distributed sensing
    SPRTFBG27Capable of detecting low concentrations of hydrogenLong response time, sensitivity to environmental; hard to achieve distributed networking
    Evanescent fieldType D28Flexible structural design; high sensitivity and versatilityComplicated fabrication process; poor mechanical robustness and long-term stability; hard to achieve distributed networking
    Taper29

    SMS

    isomerization30-31

    Photonic integrated chip

    Surface plasmonic-

    catalysis32

    Compact construction; potential for multi-function and batch preparation

    At initial stage of research;

    complex preparation processes

    MZI33
    Internal detection deviceInternal smartball34-37Localization and estimation of pipe leaks; multi-parameters detectionNot suitable for complex pipeline structures; interfere with daily work
    Table 1. Summary of direct detection technology options
    ParameterScheme

    Detection range/

    spatial resolution

    AccuracyFeature
    TemperatureRDTS5459 km/2 m3 ℃Long distance
    AHFO-OFDR602 km/1 mm0.1 ℃

    High resolution;

    high accuracy

    Temperature/strainBDTS/DSS5825 km/0.2 m0.1 ℃/2 με

    Long distance;

    high accuracy

    StrainOFDR6157.2 m/20 mmHoop strain measurement
    NPW+FBG6268 m/10 m4.21 m (location error)Knee point detection
    VibrationNPW43180 ft/-<7.33% (location error)

    Hoop strain;

    low leakage rate measurement

    Sound wave4840 km/-<25 mLong distance
    DAS+BEOF6460 m/5 m

    0.03 mm (identification error)

    3.85 cm (location error)

    High accuracy;quantitative identification and localization
    Table 2. Summary of indirect detection methods
    Cong Liu, Yu Wang, Yuxin Zhang, Sheng Chen, Wenbin Hu, Jixiang Dai, Minghong Yang. Progress in Optoelectronic Detection Technology for Safe Operation and Maintenance of Hydrogen Energy Storage and Transportation Equipment (Invited)[J]. Acta Optica Sinica (Online), 2024, 1(4): 0414001
    Download Citation