Fig. 1. Geometric model of the reference axisymmetric exhaust system
Fig. 2. Geometrical parameters of serpentine 2-D convergent-divergent nozzle
Fig. 3. Side and top views of three serpentine 2-D convergent-divergent exhaust system
Fig. 4. Serpentine 2-D convergent-divergent exhaust system with afterbody
Fig. 5. Computational domain and boundary conditions
Fig. 6. Grid of flow field and wall in serpentine 2-D convergent-divergent exhaust system
Fig. 7. Sketch map of detection planes
Fig. 8. Contrast of streamline distribution on symmetry plane of nozzle expansion section
Fig. 9. Comparison of dimensionless wall temperature distribution
Fig. 10. Comparison of constant temperature line in symmetric plane of serpentine 2-D convergent-divergent exhaust system
Fig. 11. Comparison of entrainment ratio
Fig. 12. CO2component concentration distribution on the symmetry plane
Fig. 13. Comparison of integral infrared radiation intensity on side detection plane
Fig. 14. Comparison of integral infrared radiation intensity on upper and lower detection plane
Parameter | Model A1 | Model A2 | Model A3 | LD/D | 0.641 | LC/D | 0.9 | L/D | 1.64 | S8/ D | 0.286 | A8/A6B | 0.3 | A9/A6B | 0.37 | (S8-S9)/D | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.26 |
|
Table 1. Design parameters of serpentine 2-D convergent-divergent nozzle
| Pt/Pa | Tt/
K
| WCO2 | WH2O | WCO | Core | 3.14 | 850 | 0.066 | 0.025 | 0.000 1 | Bypass | 3.10 | 350 | - | - | - | Flow field | 1 | 244.8 | - | - | - |
|
Table 2. Boundary conditions
Item | Axis | A1 | A2 | A3 | Cd | 0.922 | 0.917 | 0.935 | 0.920 | Cf | 0.975 | 0.939 | 0.942 | 0.926 |
|
Table 3. Cd and Cf of three serpentine 2-D convergent-divergent exhaust system
Parameter | Sensitivity λ | Side | Upper | Lower | (S8-S9)/D | 1.61 | 0.81 | 3.64 | (W9-W8)/D | −0.07 | −0.05 | −0.03 |
|
Table 4. Sensitivity analysis of average integral infrared radiation intensity