• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 4, 0415006 (2021)
Xiaohua Qiu1、2、*, Min Li1、*, Liqiong Zhang1, and Lin Dong2
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Operational Support, The Rocket Force University of Engineering, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710025, China
  • 2College of Information Engineering, Engineering University of PAP, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710086, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.0415006 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiaohua Qiu, Min Li, Liqiong Zhang, Lin Dong. Dual-Band Scene Classification Based on Convolutional Features and Bayesian Decision[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(4): 0415006 Copy Citation Text show less
    Framework diagram of our method
    Fig. 1. Framework diagram of our method
    Example image of the RGB-NIR dataset
    Fig. 2. Example image of the RGB-NIR dataset
    Classification accuracies of the two features. (a) RGB image; (b) NIR image; (c) RGB-NIR image
    Fig. 3. Classification accuracies of the two features. (a) RGB image; (b) NIR image; (c) RGB-NIR image
    Influence of the different threshold value on model classification accuracy. (a) C5 layer; (b) F6 layer; (c) F7 layer
    Fig. 4. Influence of the different threshold value on model classification accuracy. (a) C5 layer; (b) F6 layer; (c) F7 layer
    Classification accuracies of different CNN models. (a) VGG-16 model; (b) VGG-19 model; (c) ResNet-50 model
    Fig. 5. Classification accuracies of different CNN models. (a) VGG-16 model; (b) VGG-19 model; (c) ResNet-50 model
    Classification accuracy confusion matrix of our method. (a) Best classification accuracy in the 20 groups (98.0%); (b) worst classification accuracy in the 20 groups (88.9%)
    Fig. 6. Classification accuracy confusion matrix of our method. (a) Best classification accuracy in the 20 groups (98.0%); (b) worst classification accuracy in the 20 groups (88.9%)
    Hierarchical featureLow levelMiddle levelHigh level
    C2C3C4C5F6(G6)F7
    VGGNet56×56×12828×28×25614×14×5127×7×51240964096
    ResNet-5056×56×25628×28×51214×14×10247×7×20482048--
    Table 1. Layers and feature dimension of the VGGNet and ResNet
    LayerC2C3C4C5F6F7
    CNN feature4014082007041003522508840964096
    PCA feature of RGB359360361344328312
    PCA feature of NIR361362361350338322
    Table 2. Dimensions of different features of the VGG-16 model
    ModelC5F6(G6)F7
    0.900.950.990.900.950.990.900.950.99
    VGG-1690.6±2.590.3±2.490.5±2.491.9±2.392.0±2.591.9±2.192.4±2.793.3±2.092.9±2.5
    VGG-1990.1±2.389.8±2.389.9±2.391.1±2.691.3±2.592.0±2.591.5±3.391.3±3.490.7±3.0
    ResNet-5091.8±1.992.1±2.192.2±2.094.0±2.194.0±2.294.3±2.1------
    Table 3. Classification accuracies of different CNN models at different t unit: %
    MethodTrain/testgroupYearClassification accuracy /%
    RGBNIRRGB+NIR
    MSIFT10201162.9±3.1--73.1±3.3
    Fisher Vector10201184.5±2.3--87.9±2.2
    mCENTRIST10201478.9±5.1--84.5±2.1
    DSIFT_CLM12018----86.9
    Dual CNN (GoogLeNet)12017----92.5
    CNN_KPCA_CCA (GoogLeNet)12018----90.8
    MCNN (ResNet-50)12019----93.5
    DC_CNN12019----95.0
    Our method (worst)1(20)202087.980.888.9
    Our method (best)1(20)202096.093.998.0
    Our method (ResNet-50)20202092.3±1.988.7±3.294.3±2.1
    Table 4. Classification accuracy comparison of different methods
    Xiaohua Qiu, Min Li, Liqiong Zhang, Lin Dong. Dual-Band Scene Classification Based on Convolutional Features and Bayesian Decision[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(4): 0415006
    Download Citation