• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 40, Issue 2, 0216001 (2020)
Jianpu Zhang1, Huanyu Sun1, Shiling Wang1, Jin Huang2, Xiaoyan Zhou2, Fengrui Wang2, Hongjie Liu2, and Dong Liu1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instrumentation, College of Optical Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310027, China
  • 2Laser Fusion Research Center, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang, Sichuan 621900, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202040.0216001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jianpu Zhang, Huanyu Sun, Shiling Wang, Jin Huang, Xiaoyan Zhou, Fengrui Wang, Hongjie Liu, Dong Liu. Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Technology of Subsurface Defects in Fused Silica Optical Components[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(2): 0216001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Imaging principle of laser scanning confocal microscope. (a) Device principle; (b) pinhole structure; (c) horizontal and vertical scanning
    Fig. 1. Imaging principle of laser scanning confocal microscope. (a) Device principle; (b) pinhole structure; (c) horizontal and vertical scanning
    Two modes of silica detected by laser scanning confocal microscope. (a) Scattering mode; (b) fluorescence mode
    Fig. 2. Two modes of silica detected by laser scanning confocal microscope. (a) Scattering mode; (b) fluorescence mode
    Typical subsurface defects collected by confocal microscope. (a) Pitting defect; (b) pit defect
    Fig. 3. Typical subsurface defects collected by confocal microscope. (a) Pitting defect; (b) pit defect
    Processing effects of Fig. 3(b) by using defect enhancement algorithm. (a) Enhanced image; (b) aggregated image
    Fig. 4. Processing effects of Fig. 3(b) by using defect enhancement algorithm. (a) Enhanced image; (b) aggregated image
    Principle of double-threshold aggregation algorithm. (a) Original image; (b) processed image
    Fig. 5. Principle of double-threshold aggregation algorithm. (a) Original image; (b) processed image
    Principle of improved MC algorithm based on octree algorithm. (a) Establishment of volume data; (b) octree segmentation
    Fig. 6. Principle of improved MC algorithm based on octree algorithm. (a) Establishment of volume data; (b) octree segmentation
    Flow chart of three-dimensional reconstruction algorithm
    Fig. 7. Flow chart of three-dimensional reconstruction algorithm
    Reconstruction of pit defect in simulation. (a) Simulated defect; (b) reconstructed defect in simulation; (c) residual of reconstruction
    Fig. 8. Reconstruction of pit defect in simulation. (a) Simulated defect; (b) reconstructed defect in simulation; (c) residual of reconstruction
    Tomography image obtained from simulation. (a) Cross-section of defect from simulation; (b) confocal tomography image obtained from simulation
    Fig. 9. Tomography image obtained from simulation. (a) Cross-section of defect from simulation; (b) confocal tomography image obtained from simulation
    Restoration ratio of point cloud after reconstruction by three different algorithms
    Fig. 10. Restoration ratio of point cloud after reconstruction by three different algorithms
    Detection results of subsurface defects. (a) Scratch defect; (b) microcrack defect; (c) pit defect
    Fig. 11. Detection results of subsurface defects. (a) Scratch defect; (b) microcrack defect; (c) pit defect
    Subaperture scanning images
    Fig. 12. Subaperture scanning images
    Reconstruction results of subsurface defects. (a)(b) Reconstruction results of scratch defects; (c)(d) reconstruction results of microcrack defects; (e)(f) reconstruction results of pit defects
    Fig. 13. Reconstruction results of subsurface defects. (a)(b) Reconstruction results of scratch defects; (c)(d) reconstruction results of microcrack defects; (e)(f) reconstruction results of pit defects
    Destructive test results of subsurface defects of fused silica. (a) Etching test results of pit defects[17]; (b) polishing-residual subsurface defects[18]; (c) scratch defects[19]; (d) pit defects[20]
    Fig. 14. Destructive test results of subsurface defects of fused silica. (a) Etching test results of pit defects[17]; (b) polishing-residual subsurface defects[18]; (c) scratch defects[19]; (d) pit defects[20]
    Number of voxelsAverage time /msMemory space consumption /MB
    Contour FilterOriginal MCImproved MCContour FilterOriginal MCImproved MC
    1030.50.40.40.010.010.01
    5037051452.13.11.3
    100331235628610114032
    10002×100193122863210832752900562
    Table 1. Running time and occupied memory spaces of three different algorithms
    Defect size /μm3Number of defectsTotal volume /μm3Volume ratio (0--50 μm in depth) /%
    0--100135560.002
    >100--200711230.003
    >200--3002154330.012
    >300--4002485120.025
    >400633620.010
    Table 2. Defect volume distributions of experimental samples
    Jianpu Zhang, Huanyu Sun, Shiling Wang, Jin Huang, Xiaoyan Zhou, Fengrui Wang, Hongjie Liu, Dong Liu. Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Technology of Subsurface Defects in Fused Silica Optical Components[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(2): 0216001
    Download Citation