Fig. 1. Tracking results and response maps corresponding to proposed algorithm on Jogging-2 sequence. (a) Tracking results; (b) response maps

Fig. 2. Specific embodiment of high-confidence updating strategy in tracking process on Jogging-2 sequence

Fig. 3. Flowchart of proposed algorithm

Fig. 4. Tracking results of proposed algorithm with different parameter settings. (a) Precision plot obtained at OPE mode; (b) success plot obtained at OPE mode

Fig. 5. Tracking results of different algorithms on 100 video sequences. (a) Precision plot obtained at OPE mode; (b) success plot obtained at OPE mode; (c) precision plot obtained at SRE mode; (d) success plot obtained at SRE mode; (e) precision plot obtained at TRE mode; (f) success plot obtained at TRE mode

Fig. 6. Partial tracking results on eight video sequences. (a) Tiger1; (b) DragonBaby; (c) Bird2; (d) Board; (e) Panda; (f) Jogging-1; (g) Girl2; (h) Human6

Table 1. Precision plot values correspond to different algorithms which are used to test sets of video sequences with different attributes at OPE mode%

Table 2. Success plot values correspond to different algorithms which are used to test sets of video sequences with different attributes at OPE mode%

Table 3. Performance evaluation of proposed algorithm in different stages at OPE mode

Table 4. Average tracking speed of different algorithms

Table 5. Attributes and relevant information of eight video sequences