Author Affiliations
1National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Space Optoelectronics Technology, Jilin Key Laboratory of Space Optoelectronics Technology, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, Jilin, China2School of Opto-Electronic Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, Jilin, China3School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, Jilin, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Geometric diagram of BRDF
Fig. 2. Schematic of inclined micro plane unit
Fig. 3. Experimental principle and reflection diagram. (a) Schematic of experimental principle; (b) schematic of specular reflection; (c) schematic of diffuse reflection and volume scattering
Fig. 4. Physical diagram of experimental device. (a) Experimental device diagram; (b) experimental site picture
Fig. 5. Comparison curves of the degree of polarization of seawater under different models
Fig. 6. Simulation value and measured value of the degree of linear polarization when incident zenith angle =50° and relative azimuth angle =180°
Fig. 7. Simulation results of the degree of linear polarization of different oils in observation space. (a) Engine oil; (b) crude oil; (c) diesel oil; (d) kerosene; (e) gasoline; (f) seawater
Fig. 8. Simulation value and measured value of the degree of linear polarization when incident zenith angle =50° and view zenith angle =50°
Fig. 9. Simulation results of the degree of linear polarization of diesel in observation space. (a) =10°; (b) =20°; (c) =30°; (d) =40°; (e) =50°; (f) =60°; (g) =70°; (h) =80°
Fig. 10. Relationship between incident zenith angle and view zenith angle of different oils and degree of linear polarization when the relative azimuth angle is 180°. (a) Engine oil; (b) crude oil; (c) diesel oil; (d) kerosene; (e) gasoline; (f) seawater
Fig. 11. Simulation value and measured value of the degree of linear polarization when incident zenith angle =30°, 40°, 50° and relative azimuth angle =180°. (a) Engine oil; (b) crude oil; (c) diesel oil; (d) kerosene; (e) gasoline; (f) seawater
Fig. 12. Measured curves of relationship between wavelength and degree of linear polarization
Material | | | | | |
---|
Seawater | 1.35 | 0.00284 | 0.931 | 0.061 | 0.076 | Engine oil | 1.45 | 0.886 | 0.937 | 0.352 | 0.624 | Crude oil | 1.47 | 0.0000362 | 0.826 | 0.029 | 0.041 | Diesel oil | 1.48 | 0.385 | 0.952 | 0.181 | 0.352 | Kerosene | 1.40 | 0.939 | 0.941 | 0.367 | 0.648 | Gasoline | 1.42 | 1.431 | 0.988 | 0.379 | 0.677 | |
|
Table 1. Parameter inversion results
Material | Engine oil | Crude oil | Diesel oil | Kerosene | Gasoline | Seawater |
---|
Confidence /% | 88.3 | 87.2 | 86.9 | 85.2 | 90.8 | 87.6 |
|
Table 2. Confidence of simulation model for different oils at 50° incident zenith angle, 180° relative azimuth angle, and 0°-60° view zenith angle
Material | Engine oil | Crude oil | Diesel oil | Kerosene | Gasoline | Seawater |
---|
Confidence /% | 89.3 | 84.5 | 89.7 | 81.6 | 82.9 | 86.1 |
|
Table 3. Confidence of model for different oils at 50° incident zenith angle, 50° view zenith angle, and 120°-240° relative azimuth
Material | Engine oil | Crude oil | Diesel oil | Kerosene | Gasoline | Seawater |
---|
Confidence /% | 84.1 | 85.2 | 88.7 | 82.9 | 85.4 | 86.2 |
|
Table 4. Confidence of model for different oils at 30°, 40°, and 50° incident zenith angle, 0°-90° view zenith angle, and 180° relative azimuth angle