• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 38, Issue 10, 1001003 (2018)
Hairong Zhu*, Hai Zhu**, Peng Cai, Weiyu Li, and Wang Wang
Author Affiliations
  • Navy Submarine Academy, Qingdao, Shandong 266000, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201838.1001003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Hairong Zhu, Hai Zhu, Peng Cai, Weiyu Li, Wang Wang. Establishment and Verification of the Optical Concealment Depth Model for Layered Water[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(10): 1001003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Relationship between the optical concealment depth and the observation of the zenith angle
    Fig. 1. Relationship between the optical concealment depth and the observation of the zenith angle
    Relationship between the optical concealment depth and the attenuation coefficient of seawater
    Fig. 2. Relationship between the optical concealment depth and the attenuation coefficient of seawater
    Relationship between the optical concealment depth and the submersible reflectivity
    Fig. 3. Relationship between the optical concealment depth and the submersible reflectivity
    Calculation results of the OCD_LAYER model
    Fig. 4. Calculation results of the OCD_LAYER model
    Wave band /nmHeight of water columns /m
    358
    4900.0380.0330.061
    5200.0150.0190.055
    5320.0270.0250.058
    5550.0250.0240.057
    5600.0390.0360.074
    6620.0130.0130.030
    Table 1. Mean values of the diffusion attenuation coefficients of the 3, 5, and 8 m water columns
    TimesWave band /nm
    490520532555560662
    13.413.903.643.683.673.43
    23.423.903.643.693.683.43
    33.433.913.643.693.683.43
    43.443.913.643.693.683.43
    53.453.923.643.693.693.43
    63.453.923.643.693.693.43
    Table 2. Mean values of the diffusion attenuation coefficients under 3-m water columns measured based on the OCD model
    TimesWave band /nm
    490520532555560662
    13.503.813.683.713.693.49
    23.513.813.683.713.703.49
    33.533.813.683.713.703.49
    43.543.823.683.713.703.49
    53.543.823.683.713.713.49
    63.543.833.693.713.713.49
    73.543.843.693.723.723.49
    83.543.843.703.723.723.49
    93.543.853.703.723.713.49
    103.543.853.703.733.723.49
    Table 3. Mean values of the diffusion attenuation coefficients under 5-m water columns measured based on the OCD model
    TimesWave band /nm
    490520532555560662
    13.043.143.093.113.112.89
    23.053.143.093.123.112.89
    33.063.143.093.123.112.89
    43.073.153.093.123.112.89
    53.073.153.103.123.122.89
    63.073.163.103.123.122.89
    73.073.163.113.123.122.90
    83.073.173.113.133.122.90
    93.073.173.113.133.122.90
    103.073.173.123.133.122.90
    113.073.183.123.143.132.90
    123.073.183.133.143.142.90
    133.073.193.143.153.152.91
    143.083.193.143.163.162.91
    153.083.203.153.163.162.91
    163.083.203.153.163.172.92
    Table 4. Mean values of the diffusion attenuation coefficients under 8-m water columns measured based on the OCD model
    Wave band /nmRMSE /mAE /mRE /%Bias /m
    4900.990.9940.700.99
    5201.471.4760.261.47
    5321.201.2049.941.20
    5551.251.2551.101.25
    5601.241.2450.911.24
    6620.990.9940.580.99
    Average value1.191.1948.771.19
    Table 5. Statistical results of mean values of the diffusion attenuation coefficients based on the OCD model and the submersible model under 3-m water columns
    Wave band /nmRMSE /mAE/mRE /%Bias /m
    4901.091.0944.751.09
    5201.391.3956.891.39
    5321.251.2551.111.25
    5551.271.2752.181.27
    5601.271.2751.961.27
    6621.051.0542.901.05
    Average value1.221.2249.971.22
    Table 6. Statistical results of mean values of the diffusion attenuation coefficients based on the OCD model and the submersible model under 5-m water columns
    Wave band /nmRMSE /mAE /mRE /%Bias /m
    4900.630.6325.740.63
    5200.730.7329.840.73
    5320.680.6827.660.68
    5550.690.6928.410.69
    5600.690.6968.940.69
    6620.460.4645.940.46
    Average value0.650.6537.760.65
    Table 7. Statistical results of mean values of the diffusion attenuation coefficients based on the OCD model and the submersible model under 8-m water columns
    TimesWave band /nm
    490520532555560662
    14.074.243.263.112.833.59
    23.654.053.523.413.173.79
    33.443.923.533.513.223.84
    43.083.713.573.893.474.04
    52.963.613.594.133.634.16
    63.153.703.954.194.164.31
    73.573.864.093.873.724.16
    83.893.993.953.863.584.14
    94.003.914.174.183.904.27
    103.813.633.953.964.043.95
    113.313.193.203.303.103.55
    122.822.762.592.702.413.15
    132.522.482.352.422.152.95
    142.372.342.312.312.092.90
    152.312.302.352.302.132.95
    162.402.372.442.402.223.11
    172.602.542.592.602.383.34
    182.802.722.762.792.553.56
    193.052.952.983.002.753.79
    203.253.143.163.172.923.94
    213.323.223.233.222.983.95
    223.363.263.273.253.023.95
    233.473.373.363.353.114.02
    243.603.483.463.473.244.13
    Table 8. Measurement results of the OCD_LAYER model
    Wave band /nmRMSE /mAE /mRE /%Bias /m
    4900.950.8032.830.80
    5201.070.8936.350.89
    5320.990.8233.750.82
    5551.030.8534.860.85
    5600.850.6225.260.62
    6621.391.3254.041.32
    Average value1.050.8936.180.89
    Table 9. Statistical results of the OCD_LAYER model and the submersible model
    Hairong Zhu, Hai Zhu, Peng Cai, Weiyu Li, Wang Wang. Establishment and Verification of the Optical Concealment Depth Model for Layered Water[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(10): 1001003
    Download Citation