Fig. 1. Relationship between the optical concealment depth and the observation of the zenith angle
Fig. 2. Relationship between the optical concealment depth and the attenuation coefficient of seawater
Fig. 3. Relationship between the optical concealment depth and the submersible reflectivity
Fig. 4. Calculation results of the OCD_LAYER model
Wave band /nm | Height of water columns /m |
---|
3 | 5 | 8 |
---|
490 | 0.038 | 0.033 | 0.061 | 520 | 0.015 | 0.019 | 0.055 | 532 | 0.027 | 0.025 | 0.058 | 555 | 0.025 | 0.024 | 0.057 | 560 | 0.039 | 0.036 | 0.074 | 662 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.030 |
|
Table 1. Mean values of the diffusion attenuation coefficients of the 3, 5, and 8 m water columns
Times | Wave band /nm |
---|
490 | 520 | 532 | 555 | 560 | 662 |
---|
1 | 3.41 | 3.90 | 3.64 | 3.68 | 3.67 | 3.43 | 2 | 3.42 | 3.90 | 3.64 | 3.69 | 3.68 | 3.43 | 3 | 3.43 | 3.91 | 3.64 | 3.69 | 3.68 | 3.43 | 4 | 3.44 | 3.91 | 3.64 | 3.69 | 3.68 | 3.43 | 5 | 3.45 | 3.92 | 3.64 | 3.69 | 3.69 | 3.43 | 6 | 3.45 | 3.92 | 3.64 | 3.69 | 3.69 | 3.43 |
|
Table 2. Mean values of the diffusion attenuation coefficients under 3-m water columns measured based on the OCD model
Times | Wave band /nm |
---|
490 | 520 | 532 | 555 | 560 | 662 |
---|
1 | 3.50 | 3.81 | 3.68 | 3.71 | 3.69 | 3.49 | 2 | 3.51 | 3.81 | 3.68 | 3.71 | 3.70 | 3.49 | 3 | 3.53 | 3.81 | 3.68 | 3.71 | 3.70 | 3.49 | 4 | 3.54 | 3.82 | 3.68 | 3.71 | 3.70 | 3.49 | 5 | 3.54 | 3.82 | 3.68 | 3.71 | 3.71 | 3.49 | 6 | 3.54 | 3.83 | 3.69 | 3.71 | 3.71 | 3.49 | 7 | 3.54 | 3.84 | 3.69 | 3.72 | 3.72 | 3.49 | 8 | 3.54 | 3.84 | 3.70 | 3.72 | 3.72 | 3.49 | 9 | 3.54 | 3.85 | 3.70 | 3.72 | 3.71 | 3.49 | 10 | 3.54 | 3.85 | 3.70 | 3.73 | 3.72 | 3.49 |
|
Table 3. Mean values of the diffusion attenuation coefficients under 5-m water columns measured based on the OCD model
Times | Wave band /nm |
---|
490 | 520 | 532 | 555 | 560 | 662 |
---|
1 | 3.04 | 3.14 | 3.09 | 3.11 | 3.11 | 2.89 | 2 | 3.05 | 3.14 | 3.09 | 3.12 | 3.11 | 2.89 | 3 | 3.06 | 3.14 | 3.09 | 3.12 | 3.11 | 2.89 | 4 | 3.07 | 3.15 | 3.09 | 3.12 | 3.11 | 2.89 | 5 | 3.07 | 3.15 | 3.10 | 3.12 | 3.12 | 2.89 | 6 | 3.07 | 3.16 | 3.10 | 3.12 | 3.12 | 2.89 | 7 | 3.07 | 3.16 | 3.11 | 3.12 | 3.12 | 2.90 | 8 | 3.07 | 3.17 | 3.11 | 3.13 | 3.12 | 2.90 | 9 | 3.07 | 3.17 | 3.11 | 3.13 | 3.12 | 2.90 | 10 | 3.07 | 3.17 | 3.12 | 3.13 | 3.12 | 2.90 | 11 | 3.07 | 3.18 | 3.12 | 3.14 | 3.13 | 2.90 | 12 | 3.07 | 3.18 | 3.13 | 3.14 | 3.14 | 2.90 | 13 | 3.07 | 3.19 | 3.14 | 3.15 | 3.15 | 2.91 | 14 | 3.08 | 3.19 | 3.14 | 3.16 | 3.16 | 2.91 | 15 | 3.08 | 3.20 | 3.15 | 3.16 | 3.16 | 2.91 | 16 | 3.08 | 3.20 | 3.15 | 3.16 | 3.17 | 2.92 |
|
Table 4. Mean values of the diffusion attenuation coefficients under 8-m water columns measured based on the OCD model
Wave band /nm | RMSE /m | AE /m | RE /% | Bias /m |
---|
490 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 40.70 | 0.99 | 520 | 1.47 | 1.47 | 60.26 | 1.47 | 532 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 49.94 | 1.20 | 555 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 51.10 | 1.25 | 560 | 1.24 | 1.24 | 50.91 | 1.24 | 662 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 40.58 | 0.99 | Average value | 1.19 | 1.19 | 48.77 | 1.19 |
|
Table 5. Statistical results of mean values of the diffusion attenuation coefficients based on the OCD model and the submersible model under 3-m water columns
Wave band /nm | RMSE /m | AE/m | RE /% | Bias /m |
---|
490 | 1.09 | 1.09 | 44.75 | 1.09 | 520 | 1.39 | 1.39 | 56.89 | 1.39 | 532 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 51.11 | 1.25 | 555 | 1.27 | 1.27 | 52.18 | 1.27 | 560 | 1.27 | 1.27 | 51.96 | 1.27 | 662 | 1.05 | 1.05 | 42.90 | 1.05 | Average value | 1.22 | 1.22 | 49.97 | 1.22 |
|
Table 6. Statistical results of mean values of the diffusion attenuation coefficients based on the OCD model and the submersible model under 5-m water columns
Wave band /nm | RMSE /m | AE /m | RE /% | Bias /m |
---|
490 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 25.74 | 0.63 | 520 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 29.84 | 0.73 | 532 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 27.66 | 0.68 | 555 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 28.41 | 0.69 | 560 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 68.94 | 0.69 | 662 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 45.94 | 0.46 | Average value | 0.65 | 0.65 | 37.76 | 0.65 |
|
Table 7. Statistical results of mean values of the diffusion attenuation coefficients based on the OCD model and the submersible model under 8-m water columns
Times | Wave band /nm |
---|
490 | 520 | 532 | 555 | 560 | 662 |
---|
1 | 4.07 | 4.24 | 3.26 | 3.11 | 2.83 | 3.59 | 2 | 3.65 | 4.05 | 3.52 | 3.41 | 3.17 | 3.79 | 3 | 3.44 | 3.92 | 3.53 | 3.51 | 3.22 | 3.84 | 4 | 3.08 | 3.71 | 3.57 | 3.89 | 3.47 | 4.04 | 5 | 2.96 | 3.61 | 3.59 | 4.13 | 3.63 | 4.16 | 6 | 3.15 | 3.70 | 3.95 | 4.19 | 4.16 | 4.31 | 7 | 3.57 | 3.86 | 4.09 | 3.87 | 3.72 | 4.16 | 8 | 3.89 | 3.99 | 3.95 | 3.86 | 3.58 | 4.14 | 9 | 4.00 | 3.91 | 4.17 | 4.18 | 3.90 | 4.27 | 10 | 3.81 | 3.63 | 3.95 | 3.96 | 4.04 | 3.95 | 11 | 3.31 | 3.19 | 3.20 | 3.30 | 3.10 | 3.55 | 12 | 2.82 | 2.76 | 2.59 | 2.70 | 2.41 | 3.15 | 13 | 2.52 | 2.48 | 2.35 | 2.42 | 2.15 | 2.95 | 14 | 2.37 | 2.34 | 2.31 | 2.31 | 2.09 | 2.90 | 15 | 2.31 | 2.30 | 2.35 | 2.30 | 2.13 | 2.95 | 16 | 2.40 | 2.37 | 2.44 | 2.40 | 2.22 | 3.11 | 17 | 2.60 | 2.54 | 2.59 | 2.60 | 2.38 | 3.34 | 18 | 2.80 | 2.72 | 2.76 | 2.79 | 2.55 | 3.56 | 19 | 3.05 | 2.95 | 2.98 | 3.00 | 2.75 | 3.79 | 20 | 3.25 | 3.14 | 3.16 | 3.17 | 2.92 | 3.94 | 21 | 3.32 | 3.22 | 3.23 | 3.22 | 2.98 | 3.95 | 22 | 3.36 | 3.26 | 3.27 | 3.25 | 3.02 | 3.95 | 23 | 3.47 | 3.37 | 3.36 | 3.35 | 3.11 | 4.02 | 24 | 3.60 | 3.48 | 3.46 | 3.47 | 3.24 | 4.13 |
|
Table 8. Measurement results of the OCD_LAYER model
Wave band /nm | RMSE /m | AE /m | RE /% | Bias /m |
---|
490 | 0.95 | 0.80 | 32.83 | 0.80 | 520 | 1.07 | 0.89 | 36.35 | 0.89 | 532 | 0.99 | 0.82 | 33.75 | 0.82 | 555 | 1.03 | 0.85 | 34.86 | 0.85 | 560 | 0.85 | 0.62 | 25.26 | 0.62 | 662 | 1.39 | 1.32 | 54.04 | 1.32 | Average value | 1.05 | 0.89 | 36.18 | 0.89 |
|
Table 9. Statistical results of the OCD_LAYER model and the submersible model