• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 56, Issue 9, 090003 (2019)
Bohan Deng1, Jiahao Chen1, Menghan Hu2, Wenping Xu1、**, and Caixi Zhang1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1 School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • 2 Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing, School of Information Science Technology, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP56.090003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Bohan Deng, Jiahao Chen, Menghan Hu, Wenping Xu, Caixi Zhang. Application and Imaging Processing Algorithm of Biospeckle Technology in Fruit Quality Detection[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(9): 090003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Experimental setup for biospeckle measurements. (a) Reflection imaging based on beam expander; (b) reflection imaging based on reflector glass; (c) reflection imaging based on attenuator and diffuser; (d) transmission imaging
    Fig. 1. Experimental setup for biospeckle measurements. (a) Reflection imaging based on beam expander; (b) reflection imaging based on reflector glass; (c) reflection imaging based on attenuator and diffuser; (d) transmission imaging
    Process of symbiotic matrix construction
    Fig. 2. Process of symbiotic matrix construction
    TypeAdvantageDisadvantageApplication
    ReflectionSimple sample processing;wide range of applicationsPhysiological differencesbetween samples; largersampling errorQuality identification,damage, fungi infection, etc.
    TransmissionSame sample processing;smaller error between samples;more realistic informationSample preparation ismore complicated; experimentalresults may differ from actual useSample of goodtransmission
    Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of reflection equipment and transmission equipment and their applications
    ReferenceApplicationWavelength /nmMeasures and analysis of biospeckle activitySample
    [21]Assessment of bruising633Time history speckle pattern, inertia moment, weighted generalized difference, laser speckle contrast analysis method, FujiiApple
    [22]Differentiation of bruised and fresh regions632.8Inertia moment, absolute value difference, generalized difference, parameterized Fujii,biospeckle activity value, granulometric size distribution, grey-level co-occurrence matrix, parameterized generalized difference, alternative generalized difference, parameterized global average FujiiApple
    [23]Quality evaluation and damage identification632.8Time history speckle pattern, inertia moment, cross-correlation coefficient C, generalized differenceApple
    [24]Evaluation of damages633Time history of speckle pattern, cross correlationApple
    [25]Detection of bruises633Time history of speckle pattern, autocorrelation function, weightedgeneralized differenceApple
    [26]Identificationof early bruising632.8Fujii, generalized difference, laser speckle contrast analysisApple
    [32]Identification of mealy apples680,780Time history speckle pattern, autocorrelation function, inertia moment, absolute value of differencesApple
    [33]Identification of mealy apples680,780Time history of speckle pattern, artificial neural networksApple
    [4]Development of bull’s eye rot and quality changes632.8Correlation coefficient CApple
    [34]Pre-harvest monitoring635Correlation coefficient CApple
    [35]Early detection of fungal infection473, 532,830Fujii,correlation coefficient C, inertia moment, method based on frequency analysisApple
    [36]Monitor soluble solid content, moisture content, hardness635Gray value, RGB(red, green, blue) pixel valueApple
    [3]Quality evaluation632Correlation coefficient CApple
    [2]Chlorophyll content670Correlation coefficient CApple
    [5]Temperature effect on biospeckle activity632.8Correlation coefficient C, speckle contrast, inertia momentApple
    [37]Effect of cytochalasin B, lantrunculin B, colchicine, cycloheximid, dimethyl Sulfoxide and ion channel inhibitors635Correlation coefficient, laser speckle contrast analysisApple
    [38]Four optical methods to measure hydrostatic pressures635, 690,830, 1060Correlation coefficient CApple
    [39]Comparison of new methods and traditional methods to identify fungal infections532Fujii, motion history images, exponentially smoothed FujiiApple
    [40]Measurement of biospeckle activities during storage in 7 days632.8Spatial-temporal speckle correlation, inertia momentApple
    [41]Biospeckle activity measurement during shelf-life storage632.8Correlation coefficient CApple
    [42]Biospeckle activity measurement during storage632.8Correlation coefficient CApple
    [43]Biospeckle activity measurement632.8Time history of speckle pattern, inertia moment, absolute value of differencesApple
    [44]Biospeckle activity measurement during shelf-life storage632.8Time history of speckle pattern, inertia moment, absolute value of differencesApple
    [45]Biospeckle activity measurement during shelf-life storage632.8Generalized difference, Fujii, alternative FujiiApple
    [46]Effect of edible filmson apple quality632Inertia momentApple
    [47]Different feature extraction of evaluation of firmness680, 780Time history of speckle pattern, inertia moment, absolute value of differences, wavelet, artificial neural networksApple
    [48]Climacteric peak632.8Correlation coefficient CApple
    [40]Measurement of daily biospeckle activities during storage632.8Spatial-temporal speckle correlation, inertia momentPear
    [41]Biospeckle activity measurement during shelf-life storage632.8Correlation coefficient CPear
    [42]Biospeckle activity measurement during storage632.8Correlation coefficient CPear
    [43]Biospeckle activity measurement632.8Time history of speckle pattern, inertia moment, absolute value of differencesPear
    [44]Biospeckle activity measurement during shelf-life storage632.8Time history of speckle pattern, inertia moment, absolute value of differencesPear
    [45]Biospeckle activity measurement during shelf-life storage632.8Generalized difference, Fujii, alternative FujiiPear
    [27]Detection of stem/calyx and defect635Fujii, weighted generalized differencePear
    [49]Ripening detection632.8Auto-covariance functionPear
    [50]Maturation detection632.8Auto-covariance functionPear
    [25]Detection of bruises633Time history of speckle pattern, autocorrelation function, weighted generalized differencePear
    [28]Identification of scar region632.8Fujii, temporal difference,laser speckle contrast analysis, generalized difference, motion history imageOrange
    [51]Measurement of peel thickness633Size of laser beamOrange
    [23]Quality evaluation and damage identification632.8Time history speckle pattern, inertia moment, cross-correlation coefficient C, generalized differenceOrange
    [40]Measurement of biospeckle activities during storage632.8Spatial-temporal speckle correlation, inertia momentTomato
    [42]Biospeckle activity measurement during storage632.8Correlation coefficient CTomato
    [43]Biospeckle activity measurement632.8Time history of speckle pattern, inertia moment, absolute value of differencesTomato
    [44]Biospeckle activity measurement during shelf-life storage632.8Time history of speckle pattern, inertia moment, absolute value of differencesTomato
    [20]Detection of bruised areas and fungal development650Generalized difference,Fujii, speckle noiseStrawberry
    [52]Maturation detection632.8Time history of speckle pattern, correlation coefficient functionStrawberry
    [29]Maturation detectionUnknownMobility indexStrawberry
    [15]Maturation detection632Time history of speckle pattern, inertia moment, two-dimensional cross correlation functionMango
    [23]Quality evaluation anddamage identification632.8Time history speckle pattern, inertiamoment, cross-correlation coefficient C, generalized differenceMango
    [53]Chlorophyll index, elasticity, soluble solid contents532, 660,830Artificial neural network, support vector machineBanana
    [30]Detection of chilling injury symptoms785RGB valuesBanana
    [31]Chilling injury660, 785RGB valuesBanana
    [55]Changes in backscattering imaging before and after harvest532, 785Gaussian-Lorentzian cross product functionPlum
    [54]Quality785Lorentzian distribution functionPlum
    [56]Identification of seeded and seedless watermelon658Linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis,k-nearest neighbourWatermelon
    [57]Monitoring of quality changes during drying532, 650,780Extract illuminated area and light intensity profilePapaya
    [58]Water content and sugar content632Time history of speckle pattern, inertia momentSugar cane
    [59]Assessment of biospeckle activityUnknownTime history of speckle pattern, inertia moment, correlation coefficient CLemon
    [60]Laser light propagation785Monte Carlo simulationKiwi fruit
    [61]Adsorption behavior632Variable moment of inertiaPassion fruit
    [41]Measurement of biospeckle during shelf-life storage632.8Correlation coefficient CGuava
    [62]FirmnessUnknownPartial least squares regression, least squaressupport vector machinesPeach
    Table 2. Summery of applications of biospeckle activities and relative algorithms
    FeatureLASCATHSPGDFujiiLSTCAIMTDAVDJC
    Real-time processingYesNoNoNoNoNoNoNoYes
    ObjectAll pixelsA lineAll pixelsAll pixelsAll pixelsA lineAll pixelsA lineAll pixels
    Qualitative(qual)/quantitative(quan)QualQualQualQualQualQuanQualQuanQuan
    Table 3. Comparison of dynamic speckle processing algorithms
    Bohan Deng, Jiahao Chen, Menghan Hu, Wenping Xu, Caixi Zhang. Application and Imaging Processing Algorithm of Biospeckle Technology in Fruit Quality Detection[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(9): 090003
    Download Citation