• Infrared and Laser Engineering
  • Vol. 52, Issue 10, 20230027 (2023)
Jing Liu1,2,3, Weiqi Jin1, and Kailiang Que2
Author Affiliations
  • 1MOE Key Laboratory of Photoelectric Imaging Technology and System, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • 2Baoding Galaxy Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., Baoding 071025, China
  • 3College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20230027 Cite this Article
    Jing Liu, Weiqi Jin, Kailiang Que. A dynamic range compression method for coaxial warning LiDAR based on overlap factor[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2023, 52(10): 20230027 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagram of optical and mechanical structure for LiDAR using telescopic system
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of optical and mechanical structure for LiDAR using telescopic system
    Schematic diagram of optical and mechanical structure for warning LiDAR using single lens receiver
    Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of optical and mechanical structure for warning LiDAR using single lens receiver
    Emission lens and receiving lens of coaxial LiDAR
    Fig. 3. Emission lens and receiving lens of coaxial LiDAR
    Emission and receiving fields of view for coaxial LiDAR
    Fig. 4. Emission and receiving fields of view for coaxial LiDAR
    Schematic diagram of overlapping field of view for coaxial LiDAR considering occlusion
    Fig. 5. Schematic diagram of overlapping field of view for coaxial LiDAR considering occlusion
    Simplified diagram of overlapping field of view for coaxial LiDAR
    Fig. 6. Simplified diagram of overlapping field of view for coaxial LiDAR
    Schematic diagram of spot energy distribution of fundamental mode Gaussian laser
    Fig. 7. Schematic diagram of spot energy distribution of fundamental mode Gaussian laser
    Response curve test principle and test site with light transmission hood and rotating mirror
    Fig. 8. Response curve test principle and test site with light transmission hood and rotating mirror
    Response curve test principle and test site without light trans-mission hood and rotating mirror
    Fig. 9. Response curve test principle and test site without light trans-mission hood and rotating mirror
    Normalized LiDAR response curve
    Fig. 10. Normalized LiDAR response curve
    Normalized response curve simulated with different parameter settings
    Fig. 11. Normalized response curve simulated with different parameter settings
    ParameterValue
    Radius of emitting lens d/mm 5.75
    Radius of aperture R/mm 7
    Laser divergence angle(emission field of view) 2t/mrad 6
    Diameter of receiving lens D/mm 30
    Focal length of receiving lens f/mm 40
    Diameter of APD φ/mm 0.5
    Receiving field of view 2k = φ/f /mrad 13
    Table 1. Parameters for GL-1130 warning LiDAR
    Distance h/mm Measured data Simulation data before correction Corrected simulation data Overlap factor
    0----
    2150.5331.0000.2500.084
    6530.7790.5620.9380.559
    8100.8590.4570.9910.726
    8950.9400.4131.0000.811
    9830.9750.3740.9980.894
    10961.0000.3320.9830.993
    13690.9950.2610.7791.000
    17390.8270.2070.6181.000
    23890.6350.1590.4751.000
    29690.5010.1370.4081.000
    40280.3380.1140.3411.000
    50520.2310.1020.3061.000
    62050.1660.0940.2811.000
    70470.1170.0900.2691.000
    Table 2. Measured data and simulation data of nor-malized LiDAR response curve
    Jing Liu, Weiqi Jin, Kailiang Que. A dynamic range compression method for coaxial warning LiDAR based on overlap factor[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2023, 52(10): 20230027
    Download Citation