• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 56, Issue 12, 121003 (2019)
Qiuhan Jin1、2、*, Yangping Wang1、2、**, and Jingyu Yang1、2、***
Author Affiliations
  • 1 School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China
  • 2 Gansu Provincial Engineering Research Center for Artificial Intelligence and Graphics & Image Processing, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China;
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP56.121003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Qiuhan Jin, Yangping Wang, Jingyu Yang. Remote Sensing Image Change Detection Based on Density Attraction and Multi-Scale and Multi-Feature Fusion[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(12): 121003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Flow chart of proposed algorithm
    Fig. 1. Flow chart of proposed algorithm
    Schematic of Gabor filter
    Fig. 2. Schematic of Gabor filter
    Schematic of neighborhood system and distance. (a) Neighborhood system centered at (i, j); (b) distance between center pixel (i, j) and its neighborhood
    Fig. 3. Schematic of neighborhood system and distance. (a) Neighborhood system centered at (i, j); (b) distance between center pixel (i, j) and its neighborhood
    Remote sensing image data and reference change map in first set of experiments. (a) 2014; (b) 2018; (c) reference change map
    Fig. 4. Remote sensing image data and reference change map in first set of experiments. (a) 2014; (b) 2018; (c) reference change map
    Remote sensing image data and reference change map for second set of experiments. (a) 2016; (b) 2018; (c) reference change map
    Fig. 5. Remote sensing image data and reference change map for second set of experiments. (a) 2016; (b) 2018; (c) reference change map
    Results of change detection under different weights and classification methods for first set of experiments. (a) WS=0, WT=1, MRF; (b) WS=0.4, WT=0.6, MRF; (c) WS=0.6, WT=0.4, MRF; (d) WS=1, WT=0, MRF; (e) adaptive weight, MRF; (f) adaptive weight, DAMRF
    Fig. 6. Results of change detection under different weights and classification methods for first set of experiments. (a) WS=0, WT=1, MRF; (b) WS=0.4, WT=0.6, MRF; (c) WS=0.6, WT=0.4, MRF; (d) WS=1, WT=0, MRF; (e) adaptive weight, MRF; (f) adaptive weight, DAMRF
    Results of change detection under different weights and classification methods for second set of experiments. (a) WS=0, WT=1, MRF; (b) WS=0.4, WT=0.6, MRF; (c) WS=0.6, WT=0.4, MRF; (d) WS=1, WT=0, MRF; (e) adaptive weight, MRF; (f) adaptive weight, DAMRF
    Fig. 7. Results of change detection under different weights and classification methods for second set of experiments. (a) WS=0, WT=1, MRF; (b) WS=0.4, WT=0.6, MRF; (c) WS=0.6, WT=0.4, MRF; (d) WS=1, WT=0, MRF; (e) adaptive weight, MRF; (f) adaptive weight, DAMRF
    Continuous graph of detection accuracy for first set of experiments
    Fig. 8. Continuous graph of detection accuracy for first set of experiments
    Continuous graph of detection accuracy for second set of experiments
    Fig. 9. Continuous graph of detection accuracy for second set of experiments
    MethodandparameterFalsealarm ratePF /%Misseddetectionrate PM /%OverallaccuracyPT /%
    WS=0,WT=1, MRF13.133.289.3
    WS=0.4,WT=0.6, MRF16.628.389.2
    WS=0.6,WT=0.4, MRF16.327.589.5
    WS=1,WT=0, MRF22.429.287.6
    Adaptive weight,MRF15.926.489.7
    Adaptive weight,DAMRF14.823.390.8
    Table 1. Quantitative evaluation of change detection results for Fig. 6
    MethodandparameterFalsealarm ratePF /%Misseddetectionrate PM /%OverallaccuracyPT /%
    WS=0,WT=1, MRF45.534.684.2
    WS=0.4,WT=0.6, MRF48.623.483.3
    WS=0.6,WT=0.4, MRF41.720.586.8
    WS=1,WT=0, MRF56.730.279.7
    Adaptive weight,MRF36.216.788.3
    Adaptive weight,DAMRF34.813.889.6
    Table 2. Quantitative evaluation of change detection results for Fig. 7
    Qiuhan Jin, Yangping Wang, Jingyu Yang. Remote Sensing Image Change Detection Based on Density Attraction and Multi-Scale and Multi-Feature Fusion[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(12): 121003
    Download Citation