Author Affiliations
1 School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China2 Gansu Provincial Engineering Research Center for Artificial Intelligence and Graphics & Image Processing, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China;show less
Fig. 1. Flow chart of proposed algorithm
Fig. 2. Schematic of Gabor filter
Fig. 3. Schematic of neighborhood system and distance. (a) Neighborhood system centered at (i, j); (b) distance between center pixel (i, j) and its neighborhood
Fig. 4. Remote sensing image data and reference change map in first set of experiments. (a) 2014; (b) 2018; (c) reference change map
Fig. 5. Remote sensing image data and reference change map for second set of experiments. (a) 2016; (b) 2018; (c) reference change map
Fig. 6. Results of change detection under different weights and classification methods for first set of experiments. (a) WS=0, WT=1, MRF; (b) WS=0.4, WT=0.6, MRF; (c) WS=0.6, WT=0.4, MRF; (d) WS=1, WT=0, MRF; (e) adaptive weight, MRF; (f) adaptive weight, DAMRF
Fig. 7. Results of change detection under different weights and classification methods for second set of experiments. (a) WS=0, WT=1, MRF; (b) WS=0.4, WT=0.6, MRF; (c) WS=0.6, WT=0.4, MRF; (d) WS=1, WT=0, MRF; (e) adaptive weight, MRF; (f) adaptive weight, DAMRF
Fig. 8. Continuous graph of detection accuracy for first set of experiments
Fig. 9. Continuous graph of detection accuracy for second set of experiments
Methodandparameter | Falsealarm ratePF /% | Misseddetectionrate PM /% | OverallaccuracyPT /% |
---|
WS=0,WT=1, MRF | 13.1 | 33.2 | 89.3 | WS=0.4,WT=0.6, MRF | 16.6 | 28.3 | 89.2 | WS=0.6,WT=0.4, MRF | 16.3 | 27.5 | 89.5 | WS=1,WT=0, MRF | 22.4 | 29.2 | 87.6 | Adaptive weight,MRF | 15.9 | 26.4 | 89.7 | Adaptive weight,DAMRF | 14.8 | 23.3 | 90.8 |
|
Table 1. Quantitative evaluation of change detection results for Fig. 6
Methodandparameter | Falsealarm ratePF /% | Misseddetectionrate PM /% | OverallaccuracyPT /% |
---|
WS=0,WT=1, MRF | 45.5 | 34.6 | 84.2 | WS=0.4,WT=0.6, MRF | 48.6 | 23.4 | 83.3 | WS=0.6,WT=0.4, MRF | 41.7 | 20.5 | 86.8 | WS=1,WT=0, MRF | 56.7 | 30.2 | 79.7 | Adaptive weight,MRF | 36.2 | 16.7 | 88.3 | Adaptive weight,DAMRF | 34.8 | 13.8 | 89.6 |
|
Table 2. Quantitative evaluation of change detection results for Fig. 7