• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 14, 1410014 (2021)
Yanuo Lu1, Bingcai Chen1、2、*, Degang Chen1, Shixiang Yan1, and Shunping Li1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Computer Science and Technology, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830054, China
  • 2College of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.1410014 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yanuo Lu, Bingcai Chen, Degang Chen, Shixiang Yan, Shunping Li. Recognition Algorithm of Strip Steel Surface Defects Based on Attention Model[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(14): 1410014 Copy Citation Text show less
    Deep residual network frame for strip steel surface defect recognition based on attention mechanism
    Fig. 1. Deep residual network frame for strip steel surface defect recognition based on attention mechanism
    Strip surface defect dataset. (a) Cr; (b) In; (c) Pa; (d) Ps; (e) Rs; (f) Sc
    Fig. 2. Strip surface defect dataset. (a) Cr; (b) In; (c) Pa; (d) Ps; (e) Rs; (f) Sc
    Data preprocessing
    Fig. 3. Data preprocessing
    False color enhancement effect. (a) Before enhancement; (b) after enhancement
    Fig. 4. False color enhancement effect. (a) Before enhancement; (b) after enhancement
    Softmax Loss curve
    Fig. 5. Softmax Loss curve
    Training curves of model under different learning rates. (a) Accuracy curves; (b) loss function curves
    Fig. 6. Training curves of model under different learning rates. (a) Accuracy curves; (b) loss function curves
    Pictures with different signal-to-noise ratios. (a) No noise; (b) 50 dB; (c) 40 dB; (d) 30 dB; (e) 20 dB
    Fig. 7. Pictures with different signal-to-noise ratios. (a) No noise; (b) 50 dB; (c) 40 dB; (d) 30 dB; (e) 20 dB
    Confusion matrix of each model. (a) ResNet50; (b) A-ResNet50
    Fig. 8. Confusion matrix of each model. (a) ResNet50; (b) A-ResNet50
    Type of defectsCrInPaPsRsSc
    Before expansion300300300300300300
    After expansion900900900900900900
    Table 1. Distribution of strip surface defect datasets
    Learning rateRecognition accuracy /%Training accuracy /%Training loss valueAverage accuracy /%
    CrInPaPsRsSc
    0.0110095.0010085.0010098.3399.240.098696.32
    0.00110098.3310096.6798.3398.3399.310.020598.61
    0.000190.0098.3310088.3310098.3395.580.115495.83
    0.0000198.3396.6710078.3310096.6781.740.503795.00
    Table 2. Recognition accuracy of each defect under different learning rates
    ModelRecognition accuracy /%
    20 dB30 dB40 dB50 dB
    LBP[7]22.7863.5769.2675.05
    MB-LBP[7]25.7671.3590.2491.83
    Improved MB-LBP[7]30.6378.5695.6697.00
    ResNet5021.6575.5692.2295.56
    A-ResNet5034.4488.3394.4498.61
    Table 3. Anti-noise ability of each model under Gaussian noise with different signal-to-noise ratios
    DefectcategoryNumber of samplesPprRecallrateF1
    CrInPaPsRsSc
    Cr60000001.0001.0001.000
    In05900110.9670.9830.975
    Pa00602000.9681.0000.984
    Ps01058000.9830.9670.975
    Rs00005901.0000.9830.992
    Sc00000591.0000.9830.992
    Table 4. Recognition ability of proposed model A-ResNet50
    ModelRecognition accuracy /%Average accuracy /%Unit inference time /s
    CrInPaPsRsSc
    Model in Ref.[5]97.0094.0098.0098.0097.0093.0096.170.065
    Model in Ref.[7]99.0098.0097.0096.0097.0095.0097.000.058
    AlexNet10098.3310075.0010098.3395.280.016
    A-AlexNet10095.0010085.0010098.3396.390.017
    GoogleNet81.6710091.6781.6790.0098.3390.560.389
    A-GoogleNet93.3310096.6790.0090.0010095.000.041
    ResNet5093.3395.0010085.0010010095.560.074
    A-ResNet5010098.3310096.6798.3398.3398.610.078
    ResNet10110098.3310088.3398.3310097.500.121
    A-ResNet10110096.6710091.6710010098.050.130
    Table 5. Recognition results of strip steel surface defects by different models
    Yanuo Lu, Bingcai Chen, Degang Chen, Shixiang Yan, Shunping Li. Recognition Algorithm of Strip Steel Surface Defects Based on Attention Model[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(14): 1410014
    Download Citation