Author Affiliations
1School of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou 213001, China2School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of single LED light source mathematical model
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of the position of the measured plane
Fig. 3. Hardware environment of chip package quality inspection
Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of light source coordinate system
Fig. 5. Schematic diagrams of related parameters labeled in different coordinate systems
Fig. 6. Schematic diagram of vector analysis
Fig. 7. Flow chart of the original Salp swarm algorithm
Fig. 8. Convergence comparison of different algorithms
Fig. 9. Experimental platform of the plane illumination measurement
Fig. 10. Comparison of theoretical and actual relative illumination distribution
Fig. 11. Comparison of theoretical illumination of the measured plane and the background
Fig. 12. Illumination distribution along the X-axis when
changing by 1°
变化1°时X轴方向上的照度分布
Fig. 13. Illumination distribution along the X-axis when
changing by 1°
变化1°时X轴方向上的照度分布
Fig. 14. Illumination distribution along the X-axis when
changing by 10 mm
变化10 mm时X轴方向上的照度分布
Fig. 15. Illumination distribution along the X-axis when
changing by 10 mm
变化10 mm时X轴方向上的照度分布
Fig. 16. Comparison of optimization results and traditional forward illumination
Population size
N | Search dimension
D | Max iteration
Max | Inertia factor
C4 | Active factor
C5 | 80 | 4 | 700 | 0.1 | 0.9 |
|
Table 1. Initialization parameters of ISSA
Parameter variation | $ {\theta _1} - 1^\circ $![]() ![]() | $ {\theta _1} $![]() ![]() | $ {\theta _1} + 1^\circ $![]() ![]() | $ f $ | −1 086.9 | −1 261 | −1 115.6 |
|
Table 2. Evaluation function value corresponding to θ1
Parameter
variation
| $ {\theta _2} - 1^\circ $![]() ![]() | $ {\theta _2} $![]() ![]() | $ {\theta _2} + 1^\circ $![]() ![]() | $ f $ | −1 122.4 | −1 261 | −1 144.0 |
|
Table 3. Evaluation function value corresponding to θ2
Parameter variation | $ {\rm{d}}{x_2} - 10\;{{\rm{mm}}} $![]() ![]() | $ {\rm{d}}{x_2} $![]() ![]() | $ {\rm{d}}{x_2} + 10\;{{\rm{mm}}} $![]() ![]() | $ f $ | −627.7 | −1 261 | −657.1 |
|
Table 4. Evaluation function value corresponding to dx2
Parameter variation | $ {\rm{d}}{z_2} - 10\;{{\rm{mm}}} $![]() ![]() | $ {\rm{d}}{z_2} $![]() ![]() | $ {\rm{d}}{z_2} + 10\;{{\rm{mm}}} $![]() ![]() | $ f $ | −963.4 | −1 261 | −917.1 |
|
Table 5. Evaluation function value corresponding to dz2