• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 12, 1210006 (2021)
Xinhui Jiang1 and Zhe Li2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830047, China
  • 2Network and Information Technology Center, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830046, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.1210006 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xinhui Jiang, Zhe Li. Skin Lesion Segmentation Based on U-Shaped Structure Context Encoding and Decoding Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(12): 1210006 Copy Citation Text show less
    Network structure of our algorithm
    Fig. 1. Network structure of our algorithm
    ResNet50_32×4d residual structure
    Fig. 2. ResNet50_32×4d residual structure
    Efficient dual-channel attention mechanism module
    Fig. 3. Efficient dual-channel attention mechanism module
    Atrous spatial pyramid pooling module
    Fig. 4. Atrous spatial pyramid pooling module
    Feature decoding block
    Fig. 5. Feature decoding block
    ISIC 2017 dermoscopy image dataset
    Fig. 6. ISIC 2017 dermoscopy image dataset
    Data preprocessing
    Fig. 7. Data preprocessing
    Test results of each algorithm segmentation index on the ISIC 2017 dataset. (a) Accuracy curve of verification set; (b) loss curve of verification set; (c) Dice_Coefficient curve of test set; (d) Jaccard_Index curve of test set
    Fig. 8. Test results of each algorithm segmentation index on the ISIC 2017 dataset. (a) Accuracy curve of verification set; (b) loss curve of verification set; (c) Dice_Coefficient curve of test set; (d) Jaccard_Index curve of test set
    Test results of the speed and stability of each algorithm on the ISIC 2017 dataset. (a) Speed test results; (b) stability test results
    Fig. 9. Test results of the speed and stability of each algorithm on the ISIC 2017 dataset. (a) Speed test results; (b) stability test results
    Comparison of the segmentation results of each algorithm on the ISIC 2017 dataset and the real label, in which the smooth curves represent the real labels, and the zigzag curves represent the segmentation results
    Fig. 10. Comparison of the segmentation results of each algorithm on the ISIC 2017 dataset and the real label, in which the smooth curves represent the real labels, and the zigzag curves represent the segmentation results
    MethodVal_Accuracy /%Dice_Coefficient /%Jaccard_Index /%Specificity /%Error /%
    Our95.00±0.0488.74±0.0681.55±0.0489.54±0.304.99±0.04
    DeepLab V3 Plus93.83±0.0785.59±0.0378.16±0.0785.63±0.706.16±0.07
    DeepLab V393.10±0.3085.52±0.1576.90±0.1086.38±0.806.80±0.30
    CE-Net92.47±0.0583.54±0.2074.76±0.1486.31±0.607.52±0.05
    U-Net91.52±0.0478.81±0.1069.32±0.0773.99±0.808.48±0.04
    Table 1. Test results of each algorithm segmentation index on the ISIC 2017 dataset
    MethodVal_Accuracy /%Dice_Coefficient /%Jaccard_Index /%Specificity /%
    Our95.0088.7481.5589.54
    Goyal, et al[21]87.1479.34
    Tang, et al[22]93.5885.8377.75
    Singh, et al[23]94.9587.9076.6597.05
    Table 2. Comparison with other advanced methods on the ISIC 2017 dataset
    AlgorithmVal_Accuracy /%Dice_Coefficient /%Jaccard_Index /%Specificity /%Error /%
    With ASPP & EDAM95.00±0.0488.74±0.0681.55±0.0489.54±0.304.99±0.04
    With EDAM92.47±0.2085.20±0.0476.92±0.2086.31±0.107.52±0.20
    With ASPP94.32±0.1086.52±0.0878.50±0.1087.91±0.807.50±0.10
    Without ASPP and EDAM90.43±0.1882.08±0.0673.38±0.0888.54±0.609.56±0.18
    Table 3. Test results of our algorithm and its ablation module on ISIC 2017 dataset
    Xinhui Jiang, Zhe Li. Skin Lesion Segmentation Based on U-Shaped Structure Context Encoding and Decoding Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(12): 1210006
    Download Citation