• Acta Photonica Sinica
  • Vol. 50, Issue 10, 1010002 (2021)
Jianchao DU1, Chenglong YU1,*, Mengnan ZHAO1, and Xiaopeng WANG2
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Intergreted Service Networks,Xidian University,Xi'an 710071,China
  • 2Xi'an Highway Research Institute,Xi'an 710065,China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/gzxb20215010.1010002 Cite this Article
    Jianchao DU, Chenglong YU, Mengnan ZHAO, Xiaopeng WANG. Fast Screening Method of Bridge Crack Images[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2021, 50(10): 1010002 Copy Citation Text show less
    The preprocessing result
    Fig. 1. The preprocessing result
    P-tile binarization result
    Fig. 2. P-tile binarization result
    The longest edge extraction result
    Fig. 3. The longest edge extraction result
    Comparison of the longest edge extraction results
    Fig. 4. Comparison of the longest edge extraction results
    Minimum circumscribed circle extraction result
    Fig. 5. Minimum circumscribed circle extraction result
    Model curve with automatic threshold determination
    Fig. 6. Model curve with automatic threshold determination
    Bridge image screening result
    Fig. 7. Bridge image screening result
    Comparison of screening performance between Canny algorithm and Gabor algorithm
    Fig. 8. Comparison of screening performance between Canny algorithm and Gabor algorithm
    Image resolutionThresholdImage resolutionThreshold
    300×300301 280×72055
    400×400371 440×96060
    500×500451 920×1 08065
    580×580502 880×1 92070
    1 024×768603 840×2 16080
    1 080×720555 760×3 84085
    Table 1. The manually selected threshold
    ResolutionScreening modeThresholdACANACRNR

    580

    ×580

    Threshold manually calculated and minimum circumscribed circle5098%98.00%98.00%98%98%
    Threshold calculated by the model and minimum circumscribed circle46.298%98.00%98.00%98%98%
    Minimum circumscribed rectangle aspect ratio0.491%88.67%93.61%94%88%

    1 024

    ×768

    Threshold manually calculated and minimum circumscribed circle6091%91.83%90.19%90%92%
    Threshold calculated by the model and minimum circumscribed circle55.391%91.83%90.19%90%92%
    Minimum circumscribed rectangle aspect ratio0.486%84.61%87.50%88%84%

    1 440

    ×960

    Threshold manually calculated and minimum circumscribed circle6098%100.00%96.15%96%100%
    Threshold calculated by the model and minimum circumscribed circle61.298%100.00%96.15%96%100%
    Minimum circumscribed rectangle aspect ratio0.3585%83.01%87.23%88%82%

    1 920

    ×1 080

    Threshold manually calculated and minimum circumscribed circle6596%100.00%92.59%92%100%
    Threshold calculated by the model and minimum circumscribed circle65.595%100.00%90.90%90%100%
    Minimum circumscribed rectangle aspect ratio0.3580%80.00%80.00%80%80%

    5 760

    ×3 840

    Threshold manually calculated and minimum circumscribed circle8598%96.15%100.00%100%96%
    Threshold calculated by the model and minimum circumscribed circle89.898%96.15%100.00%100%96%
    Minimum circumscribed rectangle aspect ratio0.388%82.75%95.23%96%80%
    Table 2. Comparison of screening performance results
    Screening modeACANACRNR
    Threshold manually calculated and minimum circumscribed circle96.2%97.19%95.38%95.2%97.2%
    Threshold calculated by the model and minimum circumscribed circle96%97.19%95.04%94.8%97.2%
    Minimum circumscribed rectangle aspect ratio86%83.80%88.71%89.2%82.8%
    Table 3. Comparison of average performance data
    Image resolutionAverage screening time/sAverage detection time/s
    580×5800.084.98
    1 024×7680.2113.29
    1 440×9600.3421.24
    1 920×1 0800.4548.33
    5 760×3 8403.97255.05
    Table 4. Comparison results of screening time and detection time
    Image ResolutionThe ratio of crack images and nocrack imagesTime used for crack detection/sTime to detection after screening/s

    Time

    saved/s

    Percentage of time saved/%
    580×5801∶95064945790.31%
    3∶750214935370.31%
    5∶549825324549.19%
    1 024×7681∶91 3181071 21191.88%
    3∶71 3112191 09283.29%
    5∶51 32936796272.38%
    1 440×9601∶92 175194198191.08%
    3∶72 1104601 65078.19%
    5∶52 1247031 42166.90%
    1 920×1 0801∶94 4014083 99390.72%
    3∶74 4048553 54980.58%
    5∶54 8331 2853 54873.41%
    5 760×3 8401∶925 5202 23923 28191.22%
    3∶725 4984 74720 75181.38%
    5∶525 5057 77217 73369.52%
    Table 5. Statistical results of time spent in crack detection
    Jianchao DU, Chenglong YU, Mengnan ZHAO, Xiaopeng WANG. Fast Screening Method of Bridge Crack Images[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2021, 50(10): 1010002
    Download Citation