• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 16, 1601002 (2021)
Yun Yang, Longwei Li*, Siyan Gao, Han Bai, and Wancheng Jiang
Author Affiliations
  • School of Geological Engineering and Surveying and Mapping, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.1601002 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yun Yang, Longwei Li, Siyan Gao, Han Bai, Wancheng Jiang. Objects Detection from High-Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery Using Training-Optimized YOLOv3 Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(16): 1601002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Principle of YOLO model for object detection
    Fig. 1. Principle of YOLO model for object detection
    Our optimized YOLOv3 model training flowchart
    Fig. 2. Our optimized YOLOv3 model training flowchart
    Three objects contained in the RSOD dataset
    Fig. 3. Three objects contained in the RSOD dataset
    RSOD dataset augmentation processing. (a)Image flipping along X axis; (b)image cropping; (c) image rotation; (d) image saturation adjustment
    Fig. 4. RSOD dataset augmentation processing. (a)Image flipping along X axis; (b)image cropping; (c) image rotation; (d) image saturation adjustment
    Labeling sample of dataset using Labeling software. (a) Original image; (b) labeled image (true object bounding box)
    Fig. 5. Labeling sample of dataset using Labeling software. (a) Original image; (b) labeled image (true object bounding box)
    Comparison of the three basic sizes of anchor boxes before and after our training optimization. (a) Anchor boxes from traditional YOLOv3 model; (b) anchor boxes from our clustered augmented dataset
    Fig. 6. Comparison of the three basic sizes of anchor boxes before and after our training optimization. (a) Anchor boxes from traditional YOLOv3 model; (b) anchor boxes from our clustered augmented dataset
    Comparison of the detection results between the traditional and our optimized YOLOv3 models. (a)--(c) Traditional YOLOv3 model; (d)--(f) our optimized YOLOv3 model
    Fig. 7. Comparison of the detection results between the traditional and our optimized YOLOv3 models. (a)--(c) Traditional YOLOv3 model; (d)--(f) our optimized YOLOv3 model
    SceneDetection number of traditional modelDetection number of optimized model
    AircraftOverpassPlaygroundAircraftOverpassPlayground
    Aircraft3507539076
    Overpass161704181723
    Playground14101601511162
    Table 1. YOLOv3 model object detection result before and after optimization
    ParameterTraditional YOLOv3 modelOur optimized YOLOv3 model
    AircraftOverpassPlaygroundAircraftOverpassPlayground
    Precision0.9210.9090.9470.9240.9070.947
    Recall0.7370.7390.7620.8210.7480.771
    PA,c0.8190.8150.8440.8690.8200.850
    mAP0.8260.846
    Table 2. Evaluation results using the traditional and optimized YOLOv3 models
    Yun Yang, Longwei Li, Siyan Gao, Han Bai, Wancheng Jiang. Objects Detection from High-Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery Using Training-Optimized YOLOv3 Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(16): 1601002
    Download Citation