• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 2, 0210014 (2021)
Chunjian Hua1、2、*, Kangkang Sun1、2, and Ying Chen3
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China
  • 2Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Food Manufacturing Equipment & Technology, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China;
  • 3School of Internet of Things Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.0210014 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Chunjian Hua, Kangkang Sun, Ying Chen. Image Segmentation Algorithm of Mesh Fabric Based on Regional Minimum Gray Value[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(2): 0210014 Copy Citation Text show less
    Comparison results before and after preprocessing. (a) Image pyramid; (b) original image; (c) image after preprocessing
    Fig. 1. Comparison results before and after preprocessing. (a) Image pyramid; (b) original image; (c) image after preprocessing
    Grayscale variation image of local section of mesh. (a) Local image of mesh fabric; (b) distribution curve of gray value in local linear neighborhood
    Fig. 2. Grayscale variation image of local section of mesh. (a) Local image of mesh fabric; (b) distribution curve of gray value in local linear neighborhood
    Mesh fabric images with three different light levels. (a) Sample 1; (b) sample 2; (c) sample 3
    Fig. 3. Mesh fabric images with three different light levels. (a) Sample 1; (b) sample 2; (c) sample 3
    Results of segmenting sample 1 with different thresholds and its partial enlarged views. (a) T=20; (b) T=50; (c) T=100; (d) proposed algorithm; (e) partial enlargement of Fig. (a); (f) partial enlargement of Fig. (b); (g) partial enlargement of Fig. (c); (h) partial enlargement of Fig. (d)
    Fig. 4. Results of segmenting sample 1 with different thresholds and its partial enlarged views. (a) T=20; (b) T=50; (c) T=100; (d) proposed algorithm; (e) partial enlargement of Fig. (a); (f) partial enlargement of Fig. (b); (g) partial enlargement of Fig. (c); (h) partial enlargement of Fig. (d)
    Results of segmenting sample 2 with different thresholds and its partial enlarged views. (a) T=20; (b) T=50; (c) T=100; (d) proposed algorithm; (e) partial enlargement of Fig. (a); (f) partial enlargement of Fig. (b); (g) partial enlargement of Fig. (c); (h) partial enlargement of Fig. (d)
    Fig. 5. Results of segmenting sample 2 with different thresholds and its partial enlarged views. (a) T=20; (b) T=50; (c) T=100; (d) proposed algorithm; (e) partial enlargement of Fig. (a); (f) partial enlargement of Fig. (b); (g) partial enlargement of Fig. (c); (h) partial enlargement of Fig. (d)
    Results of segmenting sample 3 with different thresholds and its partial enlarged views. (a) T=20; (b) T=50; (c) T=100; (d) proposed algorithm; (e) partial enlargement of Fig. (a); (f) partial enlargement of Fig. (b); (g) partial enlargement of Fig. (c); (h) partial enlargement of Fig. (d)
    Fig. 6. Results of segmenting sample 3 with different thresholds and its partial enlarged views. (a) T=20; (b) T=50; (c) T=100; (d) proposed algorithm; (e) partial enlargement of Fig. (a); (f) partial enlargement of Fig. (b); (g) partial enlargement of Fig. (c); (h) partial enlargement of Fig. (d)
    Results of segmenting sample 1 with different algorithms and its partial enlarged views. (a) Shading threshold algorithm; (b) marking watershed algorithm; proposed algorithm (c) before preprocessing, (d) after preprocessing; (e) partial enlargement of Fig. (a); (f) partial enlargement of Fig. (b); (g) partial enlargement of Fig. (c); (h) partial enlargement of Fig. (d)
    Fig. 7. Results of segmenting sample 1 with different algorithms and its partial enlarged views. (a) Shading threshold algorithm; (b) marking watershed algorithm; proposed algorithm (c) before preprocessing, (d) after preprocessing; (e) partial enlargement of Fig. (a); (f) partial enlargement of Fig. (b); (g) partial enlargement of Fig. (c); (h) partial enlargement of Fig. (d)
    Results of segmenting sample 2 with different algorithms and its partial enlarged segmenting. (a) Shading threshold algorithm; (b) marking watershed algorithm; proposed algorithm (c) before preprocessing, (d) after preprocessing; (e) partial enlargement of Fig. (a); (f) partial enlargement of Fig. (b); (g) partial enlargement of Fig. (c); (h) partial enlargement of Fig. (d)
    Fig. 8. Results of segmenting sample 2 with different algorithms and its partial enlarged segmenting. (a) Shading threshold algorithm; (b) marking watershed algorithm; proposed algorithm (c) before preprocessing, (d) after preprocessing; (e) partial enlargement of Fig. (a); (f) partial enlargement of Fig. (b); (g) partial enlargement of Fig. (c); (h) partial enlargement of Fig. (d)
    Results of segmenting sample 3 with different algorithms and its partial enlarged views. (a) Shading threshold algorithm; (b) marking watershed algorithm; proposed algorithm (c) before preprocessing, (d) after preprocessing; (e) partial enlargement of Fig. (a); (f) partial enlargement of Fig. (b); (g) partial enlargement of Fig. (c); (h) partial enlargement of Fig. (d)
    Fig. 9. Results of segmenting sample 3 with different algorithms and its partial enlarged views. (a) Shading threshold algorithm; (b) marking watershed algorithm; proposed algorithm (c) before preprocessing, (d) after preprocessing; (e) partial enlargement of Fig. (a); (f) partial enlargement of Fig. (b); (g) partial enlargement of Fig. (c); (h) partial enlargement of Fig. (d)
    AlgorithmSample 1Sample 2Sample 3
    Number ofsegmentationerrorsSegmentationerrorrate/%Number ofsegmentationerrorsSegmentationerrorrate/%Number ofsegmentationerrorsSegmentationerrorrate/%
    Mark watershedalgorithm4111.0214.8103.3
    ProposedalgorithmsBeforepreprocessing16243.018341.17424.3
    Afterpreprocessing10.310.200
    Table 1. Number of mesh segmentation errors and segmentation error rate
    AlgorithmMark watershedalgorithmProposed algorithm
    Before preprocessingAfter preprocessing
    Number of meshes34932
    Number of mesh segmentation errors20611174184
    Segmentation error rate/%5.9033.610.24
    Table 2. Comparison of mesh segmentation results of different algorithms
    Chunjian Hua, Kangkang Sun, Ying Chen. Image Segmentation Algorithm of Mesh Fabric Based on Regional Minimum Gray Value[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(2): 0210014
    Download Citation