Noise Data Processing Methods in Simulation and Training System of Bone-Setting Manipulations in Traditional Chinese Medicine

Dawei Qiu; Hui Cao; Jing Liu

doi:10.3788/LOP57.031203

Journals >Laser & Optoelectronics Progress >Volume 57 >Issue 3 >Page 031203 > Article

Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
Vol. 57, Issue 3, 031203 (2020)

Noise Data Processing Methods in Simulation and Training System of Bone-Setting Manipulations in Traditional Chinese Medicine

Dawei Qiu, Hui Cao, and Jing Liu^*

Author Affiliations

College of Technology, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong 250355, China

show less

DOI: 10.3788/LOP57.031203 Cite this Article Set citation alerts

Dawei Qiu, Hui Cao, Jing Liu. Noise Data Processing Methods in Simulation and Training System of Bone-Setting Manipulations in Traditional Chinese Medicine[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(3): 031203 Copy Citation Text

show less

Fig. 1. Experimental results of motion trajectory of sample Building and KF. (a) 0^th order; (b) 1^st order; (c) 2^nd order

Download full size

Fig. 2. Residual error on axis x, y, and z with KF. (a) 0^th order; (b) 1^st order; (c) 2^nd order

Download full size

Fig. 3. Trajectories and filtering results with 2^nd order KF on sample Building withdifferent R values. (a) 30I; (b) 4I; (c) 0.2I

Download full size

Fig. 4. Trajectories and filtering results with 2^nd order KF on sample Building with different Q values. (a) 3I; (b) 0.1I; (c) 0.01I

Download full size

Fig. 5. Residual error on axis x with 0^th, 1^st, 2^nd order KF

Download full size

Fig. 6. Trajectory and filtering result of bone-setting manipulation in traditional Chinese medicine

Download full size

Algorithm	Coordinates	Building	Cold	Computer	Danger	Eat	God
	x	85.7652991	37.2144727	43.2016349	18.2427934	11.4084809	74.4759544
0^th order	y	190.6906610	67.9803545	44.8695997	25.9943078	21.8600122	50.9970174
	z	39.6238095	93.5489278	36.9415326	12.7371938	10.5501292	36.8776872
	x	34.8060188	22.0381775	17.0539551	76.5149218	5.2381563	28.5459469
1^st order	y	51.7367249	25.2197531	14.6823782	108.5313820	10.0821014	20.2509513
	z	21.5915851	36.4534309	11.9317256	66.8423323	5.9774000	17.0546853
2^nd order	x	21.5348542	15.3540591	9.8737133	43.4974544	3.1575473	16.3090411
	y	20.9164303	14.3103942	8.2031978	46.6180675	6.6071327	11.5142255
	z	11.3291778	18.9367321	5.9826285	38.9013875	4.2322532	10.4729371

Table 1. Absolute sum of residual error with 0^th, 1^st, 2^nd order KF on 6 samples

P	x	y	z
500I	21.5331796472	20.9148040842	11.3286435679
400I	21.5332857047	20.9149071307	11.3286774147
300I	21.5334620487	20.9150784521	11.3287336890
200I	21.5338131761	20.9154195184	11.3288457268
100I	21.5348542396	20.9164302782	11.3291778089
80I	21.5353679541	20.9169287787	11.3293416198
60I	21.5362142518	20.9177496369	11.3296114025
50I	21.5368825409	20.9183975074	11.3298243686
20I	21.5425688778	20.9238983290	11.3316338730

Table 2. SAE with 2^nd order KF on sample Building with different P values

R	x	y	z
30I	48.4224737799	83.2914649103	29.7303597756
20I	45.2534437711	72.9649548151	27.1003582400
10I	39.2102712106	56.0411115683	23.0350022062
8I	37.6539014890	50.7264461524	21.8085859406
6I	35.4847479897	44.8345042921	20.3777090702
4I	32.3419862431	38.2323760679	18.2134450501
2I	26.7796712207	28.0406756060	14.4526400811
I	21.5348542396	20.9164302782	11.3291778089
0.5I	16.3290769750	14.9986293718	9.0987576773
0.2I	10.4897126591	9.5568669154	6.4364301022

Table 3. SAE with 2^nd order KF on sample Building with different R values

Q	x	y	z
3I	3.6143305371	3.2402297349	2.3305651027
2I	4.8386090425	4.3558218077	3.0528520933
I	7.4431476121	6.7908915597	4.5985021498
0.1I	21.5348542396	20.9164302782	11.3291778089
0.05I	26.4180406329	27.7421923202	14.2432048317
0.02I	32.8214863288	40.9316630926	18.6174965700
0.01I	37.2450016960	53.8418198128	21.6609952331

Table 4. SAE with 2^nd order KF on sample Building with different Q values

Algorithm	x	y	z
0^th order	87.8364660648	89.3155974421	91.9954644107
1^st order	65.0689560382	54.8607837037	48.7496570238
2^nd order	28.9052231389	25.9885475680	23.6793952765

Table 5. Sum of absolute errors with 0^th, 1^st, 2^nd order KF on one sample of Chinese bone-setting

Download Citation

Set citation alerts for the article

Tools

Set citation alerts for the article

Save the article for my favorites

Paper Information