Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Radar Emitter Signal Features Performance

Yunwei Pu; Haixiao Wu; Taotao Liu; Jiang Guo

doi:10.3788/LOP202158.0928001

Journals >Laser & Optoelectronics Progress >Volume 58 >Issue 9 >Page 0928001 > Article

Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
Vol. 58, Issue 9, 0928001 (2021)

Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Radar Emitter Signal Features Performance

Yunwei Pu^1、2、*, Haixiao Wu¹, Taotao Liu¹, and Jiang Guo²

Author Affiliations

¹Faculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming , Yunnan 650500, China

²Computer Center, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming , Yunnan 650500, China

show less

DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.0928001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts

Yunwei Pu, Haixiao Wu, Taotao Liu, Jiang Guo. Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Radar Emitter Signal Features Performance[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(9): 0928001 Copy Citation Text

show less

Fig. 1. Comprehensive evaluation index system of radar emitter signal features

Download full size

Fig. 2. Construction process of group decision matrix in evaluation of radar emitter feature

Download full size

Fig. 3. VIKOR ranking process based on fuzzy cross entropy in evaluation of radar emitter feature

Download full size

Fig. 4. Scheme score value

Download full size

Fig. 5. TOPSIS method score value

Download full size

Fig. 6. Projection model score value

Download full size

Solution
Solution				…
$A_{1}$	([0.0897, 0.0982],[0.2244, 0.6732])	([0.6667, 0.6667],[0.0833, 0.2500])	([1.0000, 1.0000],[0.0000, 0.0000])	…	([0.9812, 0.9937],[0.0000, 0.0000])	([0.0978, 0.1070],[0.2221, 0.6663])	([0.9775, 0.9925],[0.0000, 0.0000])
$A_{2}$	([0.8594, 0.9531],[0.0000, 0.0000])	([1.0000, 1.0000],[0.0000, 0.0000])	([0.1322, 0.1322],[0.2169, 0.6508])	…	([0.8646, 0.9549],[0.0000, 0.0000])	([0.8594, 0.9531],[0.0000, 0.0000])	([0.8497, 0.9499],[0.0000, 0.0000])
$A_{3}$	([0.0287, 0.0306],[0.2421, 0.7264])	([0.6667, 0.6667],[0.0833, 0.2500])	([0.1403, 0.1403],[0.2149, 0.6448])	…	([0.9075, 0.9691],[0.0000, 0.0000])	([0.0296, 0.0315],[0.2419, 0.7256])	([0.8275, 0.9425],[0.0000, 0.0000])
$A_{4}$	([0.0264, 0.0230],[0.2428, 0.7284])	([1.0000, 1.0000],[0.0000, 0.0000])	([0.2232, 0.2232],[0.1942, 0.5826])	…	([0.8317, 0.8750],[0.0258, 0.0775])	([0.0182, 0.0240],[0.2433, 0.7298])	([0.8300, 0.9100],[0.0125, 0.0375])

Table 1. SNR decision matrix（SNR is 2 dB）

Solution
Solution				…
$A_{1}$	([0.0950, 0.1034],[0.2231, 0.6693)	([0.6667, 0.6667,[0.0833, 0.2500])	([1.0000, 1.0000],[0.0000, 0.0000])	…	([1.0000, 1.0000],[0.0000, 0.0000])	([0.0995, 0.1084],[0.2218, 0.6654])	([1.0000, 1.0000],[0.0000, 0.0000])
$A_{2}$	([0.8983, 0.9662],[0.0000, 0.0000])	([1.0000, 1.0000],[0.0000, 0.0000])	([0.0507, 0.0507],[0.2374, 0.7120])	…	([0.9426, 0.9809],[0.0000, 0.0000])	([0.8983, 0.9662],[0.0000, 0.0000])	([0.9330, 0.9777],[0.0000, 0.0000])
$A_{3}$	([0.0313, 0.0326],[0.2417, 0.7251])	([0.6667, 0.6667],[0.0833, 0.2500])	([0.0497, 0.0497],[0.2375, 0.7127])	…	([0.9372, 0.9791],[0.0000, 0.0000])	([0.0315, 0.0328],[0.2417, 0.7249])	([0.8910, 0.9637],[0.0000, 0.0000])
$A_{4}$	([0.0288, 0.0290],[0.2423, 0.7270])	([1.0000, 1.0000],[0.0000, 0.0000])	([0.0778, 0.0778],[0.2305, 0.6916])	…	([0.8747, 0.9138],[0.0166, 0.0498])	([0.0257, 0.0751],[0.2429, 0.7285])	([0.8772, 0.9502],[0.0000, 0.0000])

Table 2. Group decision matrix

Yunwei Pu, Haixiao Wu, Taotao Liu, Jiang Guo. Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Radar Emitter Signal Features Performance[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(9): 0928001

Download Citation

Set citation alerts for the article

Tools

Set citation alerts for the article

Save the article for my favorites

Paper Information