Renqi Liu, Chun Peng, Xiaoyan Liang, Ruxin Li, "Coherent beam combination far-field measuring method based on amplitude modulation and deep learning," Chin. Opt. Lett. 18, 041402 (2020)

Search by keywords or author
- Chinese Optics Letters
- Vol. 18, Issue 4, 041402 (2020)

Fig. 1. (a) A simple schematic diagram of a two-beam tiled-aperture CBC system and (b) the training procedure of DCNN.
![Far-field distribution under different beam-pointing and phase differences: (a) [0,0,0,0,0], (b) [20 μrad,20 μrad,−20 μrad,−20 μrad,0], and (c) [0,0,0,0,π].](/richHtml/col/2020/18/4/041402/img_002.jpg)
Fig. 2. Far-field distribution under different beam-pointing and phase differences: (a) , (b) , and (c) .
![Far-field distribution under different amplitude modulation ratios: (a) A2=A1, [20 μrad,20 μrad,0,0,0], (b) A2=A1, [0,0,20 μrad,20 μrad,0], (c) A2=2A1, [20 μrad,20 μrad,0,0,0], and (d) A2=2A1, [0,0,20 μrad,20 μrad,0].](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 3. Far-field distribution under different amplitude modulation ratios: (a) , , (b) , , (c) , , and (d) , .

Fig. 4. (a) Training and validation errors across training epochs. (b) The testing set error of 500 samples; the red circle represents the beam-pointing error, and the blue sign represents the phase difference error.

Fig. 5. Testing set error distribution, in the cases of , , , and : (a) the beam-pointing error and (b) the phase difference error.

Fig. 6. Testing set error distribution, in the cases of , , , and : (a) the beam-pointing error and (b) the phase difference error.

Fig. 7. Testing set error distribution, in the cases of , , , and : (a) the beam-pointing error and (b) the phase difference error.
|
Table 1. Measurement Errors Under Different Wavefront Aberrations

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address