Journals
Advanced Photonics
Photonics Insights
Advanced Photonics Nexus
Photonics Research
Advanced Imaging
View All Journals
Chinese Optics Letters
High Power Laser Science and Engineering
Articles
Optics
Physics
Geography
View All Subjects
Conferences
CIOP
HPLSE
AP
View All Events
News
About CLP
Search by keywords or author
Login
Registration
Login in
Registration
Search
Search
Articles
Journals
News
Advanced Search
Top Searches
metasurface
laser
nir
optical coherence tomography
Lithium niobate
OAM
Journals >
Laser & Optoelectronics Progress >
Volume 57 >
Issue 8 >
Page 081014 > Article
Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
Vol. 57, Issue 8, 081014 (2020)
Action Prediction and Scale Adaptive Target Tracking Algorithm
Xuemeng Tang, Zhiguo Chen
*
, and Yi Fu
Author Affiliations
[in Chinese]
show less
DOI:
10.3788/LOP57.081014
Cite this Article
Set citation alerts
Xuemeng Tang, Zhiguo Chen, Yi Fu. Action Prediction and Scale Adaptive Target Tracking Algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(8): 081014
Copy Citation Text
EndNote(RIS)
BibTex
Plain Text
show less
Fig. 1.
Predicting car movement
Download full size
Fig. 2.
Prediction results. (a)
x
coordinate prediction; (b)
y
coordinate prediction
Download full size
Fig. 3.
Block detection results
Download full size
Fig. 4.
Flow chart of algorithm
Download full size
Fig. 5.
Flow chart of improved algorithm
Download full size
Fig. 6.
Partial experimental results. (a) BlurCar; (b) Box; (c) Boy; (d) Car4; (e) Singer1; (f) Surfer; (g) Walking2; (h) Walking
Download full size
Fig. 7.
Precision curves of partial experimental result. (a) Bolt; (b) Box; (c) Car2; (d) Dancer; (e) Human6; (f) Soccer
Download full size
Fig. 8.
Error curves of partial experimental result. (a) Bolt; (b) Box; (c) Car2; (d) Dancer; (e) Human6; (f) Soccer
Download full size
Fig. 9.
Test results. (a) Average CLE (front 250 frame); (b) DP graph
Download full size
Video
Number
of frames
Main factor
of influence
BlurCar2
576
SV,MB,FM
Bolt
350
SV,DEF,BC,OCC,IPR,OPR
Bolt2
293
SV,DEF,BC
Box
400
SV,IV,OCC,MB,IPR,
OPR,OV,BC,LR
Boy
602
SV,MB,FM,IPR,OPR
Car2
913
SV,MB,FM,BC,IV
Car4
659
SV,IV,BC
Dancer
225
SV,DEF,IPR,OPR
Doll
1000
IV,SV,OCC,IPR,OPR
Human6
792
SV,OCC,DEF,FM,OPR,OV
Human8
128
IV,SV,DEF
Singer1
319
IV,SV,OCC,OPR
Soccer
380
IV,SV,OCC,MB,FM,IPR,OPR,BC
Surfer
370
SV,FM,IPR,OPR,LR
Walking
412
SV,OCC,DEF
Walking2
500
SV,OCC,LR
Woman
597
SV,OCC, IV,DEF,MB,FM,OPR
Table 1.
Test video in the experiment
Algorithm
DSST
ECO
KCF
LADCF
LDES
SAMF
FSKCF
Bolt
100.00
100.00
98.90
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Bolt2
2.10
83.30
1.70
39.90
01.70
1.70
100.00
Boy
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Car4
100.00
100.00
95.00
100.00
99.80
100.00
100.00
Human6
44.80
98.90
29.00
97.90
98.90
92.30
99.70
Surfer
70.00
100.00
90.80
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
Average
69.48
97.03
69.23
89.63
83.40
82.33
99.95
Table 2.
Tracking precision of the algorithm on fast motion video%
Algorithm
DSST
ECO
KCF
LADCF
LDES
SAMF
FSKCF
BlurCar2
100.0
100.0
97.9
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Bolt
100.0
100.0
98.9
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Bolt2
2.1
83.3
1.7
39.9
1.7
1.7
100.0
Box
100.0
99.8
100.0
100.0
98.8
100.0
100.0
Boy
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Car2
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Car4
100.0
100.0
95.0
100.0
99.8
100.0
100.0
Dancer
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Doll
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Human6
44.8
98.9
29.0
97.9
98.9
92.3
99.7
Human8
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
32.8
100.0
100.0
Singer1
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Soccer
70.5
24.0
81.3
21.1
24.7
20.8
97.4
Surfer
70.0
100.0
90.8
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Walking
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Walking2
100.0
100.0
44.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Woman
93.8
100.0
93.8
100.0
98.5
93.8
99.2
Table 3.
Tracking precision of the algorithm on the video%
Algorithm
DSST
ECO
KCF
LADCF
LDES
SAMF
FSKCF
BlurCar2
1.00
1.00
0.98
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Bolt
1.00
1.00
0.99
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.99
Bolt2
0.01
0.78
0.01
0.30
0.01
0.01
0.23
Box
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Boy
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Car2
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Car4
1.00
1.00
0.51
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Dancer
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.96
Doll
1.00
1.00
0.90
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.86
Human6
0.46
0.99
0.24
0.99
1.00
0.47
0.28
Human8
1.00
1.00
0.73
1.00
0.29
0.78
1.00
Singer1
1.00
1.00
0.44
1.00
1.00
0.75
1.00
Soccer
0.57
0.23
0.44
0.24
0.23
0.21
0.58
Surfer
0.36
0.97
0.74
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.74
Walking
1.00
1.00
0.73
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Walking2
1.00
1.00
0.43
1.00
1.00
0.99
1.00
Woman
0.94
0.93
0.94
0.94
0.96
0.94
0.98
Table 4.
Overlap rate of the algorithm tracking on the video
Parameter
DSST
ECO
KCF
LADCF
LDES
SAMF
FSKCF
DP/%
92.4
95.2
89.4
94.9
90.8
94.2
99.8
CLE
21.7
11.5
33.0
12.5
36.4
18.5
2.7
OP
0.87
0.93
0.74
0.91
0.84
0.85
0.88
V
/(frame/s)
32.7
44.3
224.6
12.8
11.0
15.0
66.7
Table 5.
Mean values of indicators on 17 videos by different algorithms
Abstract
Get PDF(in Chinese)
Figures&Tables (14)
Equations (0)
References (25)
Cited By (3)
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Xuemeng Tang, Zhiguo Chen, Yi Fu. Action Prediction and Scale Adaptive Target Tracking Algorithm[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(8): 081014
Download Citation
EndNote(RIS)
BibTex
Plain Text
Set citation alerts for the article
Tools
Share
Set citation alerts for the article
Save the article for my favorites
Paper Information
Category: Image Processing
Received: Jul. 17, 2019
Accepted: Sep. 16, 2019
Published Online: Mar. 30, 2020
The Author Email: Chen Zhiguo (427533@qq.com)
DOI:
10.3788/LOP57.081014
Recommended Topics
laser devices and laser physics
Lasers and Laser Optics
Laser physics
laser manufacturing
Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology
Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address
Cancel
Confirm