• Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves
  • Vol. 42, Issue 3, 306 (2023)
Ze-Zhong CHEN1, Yong-Fei DUAN1, Hong-Yu LIN3, Zhen-Yu ZHANG1, Hao XIE2, Yan SUN2, Shu-Hong HU2、*, and Ning DAI2、4、**
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Materials and Chemistry, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
  • 2Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China
  • 3Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou311100, China
  • 4Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310024, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2023.03.004 Cite this Article
    Ze-Zhong CHEN, Yong-Fei DUAN, Hong-Yu LIN, Zhen-Yu ZHANG, Hao XIE, Yan SUN, Shu-Hong HU, Ning DAI. Liquid Phase Epitaxy (LPE) growth of the room-temperature InAs-based mid-infrared photodetector[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2023, 42(3): 306 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    The material quality is very important to obtain the high performance infrared detector. It is presented that the key issue of the material quality is to control the lattice mismatch between the layers of the device architecture. The effects of the lattice mismatch on the material quality and the dark current characteristics were reported. In the InAs/InAsSbP system grown by LPE technology, there is an appropriate value for the lattice mismatch between InAsSbP and InAs. If the lattice mismatch deviates from this value, no matter whether it is smaller or larger, the material quality will deteriorate. Then it was stated how to adjust growth parameters to obtain the appropriate lattice mismatch. The infrared detector made from the device architecture with the appropriate lattice mismatch was fabricated, and the room-temperature peak detectivity of this detector is 6.8×109 cm Hz1/2W-1 at zero bias, which is comparable with that of international commercial InAs photodetectors.

    Introduction

    Infrared detectors that operate in the middle-wavelength infrared (MWIR)range are essential for many applications,such as satellite communications,target tracking,and object identification1-3. Mercury Cadmium Telluride (HgCdTe)detectors are dominant in infrared photoelectric detection4-5,however,they are limited by low operating temperatures. InAs-based MWIR detectors are now preferred for room-temperature applications due to the introduction of a new type of device structure 6-8. There are two types of InAs-based infrared detectors reported in recent years,one uses AlAsSb-based alloy as barrier grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE)technology9-15,which needs driving voltage,and the other uses InAsSbP alloy as barrier grown by LPE technology16-17,which can work at zero bias voltage.

    In Ref. [16],we presented a high-performance room-temperature InAs-based infrared photodetector,the room-temperature peak detectivity of the photodetector is as high as 1.6×1010cm Hz1/2W-1 at zero bias. We all know that device performance is strongly dependent on the quality of device materials,however,there are few reports on the growth details of InAs-based detectors,whether LPE growth or MBE growth18. In this work,firstly we studied the surface defects of InAsSbP epilayer when the lattice mismatch between InAsSbP and InAs deviates from the appropriate value. Secondly,we state how to adjust growth parameters to obtain the appropriate lattice mismatch. Thirdly,we gave the I-V curves of the device to verify the dark current characteristic of the device architecture with different lattice match. Lastly,we fabricated the infrared detector made from the device architecture with appropriate lattice mismatch and measured its room-temperature detectivity.

    1 Experiments

    The samples were grown on (100)-oriented InAs substrate by LPE technology,using a conventional horizontal sliding graphite boat. The precursors for the growth melts were undoped polycrystalline InAs,InP,and 7 N pure Indium (In)and Antimony (Sb). InAs substrates were rinsed successively with acetone,isopropanol,and deionized water. They were then etched using a mixture solution (H2O2:HNO3 = 5:3)to remove the native oxide layer on their surface. Prior to the epitaxial growth,the source materials were baked at 650 °C for 2.5 hours under a purified hydrogen gas flow (hydrogen gas purifier:Simpure 9NP050-H)to homogenize and remove the volatile impurities. Growth was initiated at 550 ℃ using the supercooling technique.

    The structural properties of the epilayers were investigated by high-resolution X-ray diffraction (HRXRD)measurements (D8/Discover 2 000,Bruker,Germany). Only Cu Kα1 line (λ=1.540 6 Å)was provided through the Ge (220)monochromator. The cross-section micrographs of device samples were observed by scanning electronic microscopy (SEM)(Sirion 200D1615,FEI,USA)measurements. Before the SEM observation,the samples were corroded using the corrosive A-B solution (A:40 cm3 H2O + 0.3g AgNO3+40 cm3 HF and B:40g CrO3+ 40 cm3 H2O)for 3 seconds to display clear interfaces. The resulting structure was processed into 200 μm-diameter mesa-etched photodiodes using conventional photolithography and processing techniques. Ohmic contacts were formed by the thermal evaporation of Cr/Au. No attempts were made to passivate the surfaces. The spectral response was measured using a Nicolet Is50 FTIR spectrometer. The light emitted by a blackbody source passed through the interferometer and was collected by the device. The detectivity D* was measured using a blackbody temperature of 900 K,a testing bandwidth of 100 Hz,and a modulation frequency of 1000 Hz.

    2 Results and discussions

    2.1 LPE growth of InAsSbP epilayer on InAs substrate

    A serial of samples with the different lattice mismatches of 0.4-0.07% were grown by LPE technology. Figure 1(a)shows the HRXRD patterns of samples S1-S6 and Fig. 1(b)shows rocking curves of InAsSbP epilayer of samples S1-S6. We note that the full width at half maximum (FWHM)value of InAsSbP epilayer for sample S3 with the lattice mismatch of 0.22% is comparable to that of InAs substrate,indicating the high quality of the crystalline lattice for InAsSbP epilayer of this sample. For samples with the lattice mismatches deviating from the value of 0.22%,whatever the lattice mismatch is smaller or larger than 0.22%,the FWHM is significantly widened,which means that the crystalline quality of InAsSbP epilayer becomes poor. It is easy to understand that when the lattice mismatch increases,the FWHM widens and the quality of the crystalline lattice becomes poor,but it is surprising that the decrease of the lattice mismatch has also led to the increase of the FWHM. Figure 2 shows the surface morphology of samples S1-S6. It can be seen that the surface morphology of InAsSbP epilayer is strongly dependent on the lattice mismatch between InAsSbP and InAs. When the lattice mismatch increases along the positive mismatch direction,crosshatch pattern begins to appear,which develops from faint to clear with the increase of lattice mismatch,as shown in sample S1 and S2 in Fig. 2. Crosshatch pattern is a typical morphology of epilayer grown by LPE technology,which is closely related to the presence of interfacial dislocation19. It is normally considered that the smaller the lattice mismatch between hetero-epitaxial layers,the easier it is to obtain the epilayer with low defect density. In InAsSbP/InAs system,however,when the lattice mismatch continues to decrease,some bulge-like defects appeared on the surface,as shown in sample S5 in Fig. 2. As the lattice mismatch is close to zero,the bulge-like defects density increases fast and the morphology became poor as shown in sample S6 in Fig. 2. However the formation mechanism of the bulge-like defects in InAsSbP/InAs system is not very clear. The InAsSbP epilayer with shiny uniform surface only could be obtained in the condition of slight positive lattice mismatch,the value of which is about 0.2% in our work.

    (a)HRXRD patterns of samples S1-S6 and (b)rocking curves of (400)peaks of InAsSbP epilayer of samples S1-S6

    Figure 1.(a)HRXRD patterns of samples S1-S6 and (b)rocking curves of (400)peaks of InAsSbP epilayer of samples S1-S6

    Optical surface morphology of samples S1-S6

    Figure 2.Optical surface morphology of samples S1-S6

    2.2 LPE growth of the device material

    We have designed the three device samples D1-D3 with different lattice mismatch of 0.09%,0.21% and 0.40%. We intend to study how the detector performance will be when the lattice mismatch deviates from the appropriate value of about 0.2%. Figure 3 shows the structure schematic of the device samples. The growth started with a 1.2-1.5 μm InAsSbP barrier layer,and then 3-4 μm undoped InAs absorption layer was grown,a 700-800 nm highly doped n-type InAsSbP window layer was grown at the last step. The key to the design of this device structure is the introduction of the InAsSbP barrier layer and window layer,which provides the advantage of suppressing the diffusion dark current and surface leakage current,respectively.

    The structure schematic of the device samples D1-D3

    Figure 3.The structure schematic of the device samples D1-D3

    In the abovementioned epi-structure,there are three interfaces of InAsSbP barrier/InAs substrate,InAs absorber/InAsSbP barrier,and InAs absorber / InAsSbP window,which involve the lattice mismatch of InAsSbP and InAs.

    The HRXRD patterns of the three device samples D1-D3 are shown in Fig. 4. We state below how to adjust the growth parameters to obtain the appropriate lattice mismatch. There are two most important growth parameters that affect the lattice mismatch,one is the growth temperature,and the other is the liquid composition of melt for the InAsSbP epilayer. The growth temperature and liquid composition of the three device samples are shown in Table 1. If InAsSbP peak in XRD is expected to shift towards higher angle (decrease the lattice mismatch),we usually tend to increase the growth temperature and increase the phosphorus mole fraction in liquid composition. If InAsSbP peak in XRD is expected to shift towards the lower angle (increase the lattice mismatch),we usually tend to increase the antimony mole fraction in liquid composition while the growth temperature remains unchanged. The most important concern that the lattice mismatch of some device samples is an appropriate value of about 0.2%,but the surface morphology of the device samples is dark and not shiny,which means material quality is poor. In this situation we usually increase the growth temperature and increase the arsenic mole fraction in liquid composition,then the surface morphology becomes shiny and the lattice mismatch remains the same.

    The HRXRD patterns of the device samples D1-D3

    Figure 4.The HRXRD patterns of the device samples D1-D3

    SampleLattice mismatch of InAsSbP/InAsTg/℃Layer

    Liquid composition

    (Mole fraction)

    Solid composition

    (InAs1-x-ySbxPy

    XLInXLAsXLSbXLPxy
    D10.09553InAsSbP barrier0.652 30.010 50.336 10.001 10.100.37
    InAs absorber0.910 40.089 6----
    InAsSbP window0.652 30.010 50.336 10.001 10.100.37
    D20.21553InAsSbP barrier0.633 60.010 50.354 80.001 10.120.30
    InAs absorber0.910 40.089 6----
    InAsSbP window0.633 60.010 50.354 80.001 10.120.30
    D30.40551InAsSbP barrier0.633 70.010 50.354 80.001 00.140.26
    InAs absorber0.910 40.089 6----
    InAsSbP window0.633 70.010 50.354 80.001 00.140.26

    Table 1. Growth temperature Tg, liquid and solid composition of device samples with different lattice mismatches

    2.3 Device performance analysis

    Typical I-V curves obtained at room temperature for the device samples D1-D3 are shown in Fig. 5. Obviously,the dark current of D2 sample is the lowest among the three device samples. Sample D2 shows an ideal I-V characteristic curve,the reverse leakage current of samples D1 and D3 increases rapidly with the increase of voltage,indicating that the device forms an obvious leakage channel.

    I-V curves of device samples D1-D3

    Figure 5.I-V curves of device samples D1-D3

    Figure 6 shows the room-temperature performance of the device sample D2. The peak responsivity is 0.62 A/W. The peak detectivities were calculated using the following equation10.

    D*=Ri2qJd+4KbTRA

    where Ri is the device responsivity,Jd is the dark current density,q is the electron charge,Kb is the Boltzamnn constant,T is the temperature,R is the dynamic resistance,and A is the detector area. The peak detectivity was calculated to be 6.8×109 cm Hz1/2W-1,which is nearly 1.5-2.5 times that of the Teledyne Judson Technologies 20 and the Hamamatsu Company21. Notably,among all the well-known commercial infrared detector suppliers,room-temperature InAs detectors are only provided by Teledyne Judson Technologies and Hamamatsu,which are global leaders for infrared detectors.

    The responsivity and detectivity of device sample D2 measured at room temperature

    Figure 6.The responsivity and detectivity of device sample D2 measured at room temperature

    3 Conclusion

    The paper reported the LPE growth of the high room-temperature performance mid-infrared InAs-based photodetector. It is proposed that careful control of the lattice mismatch between InAsSbP and InAs is crucial for obtaining the expected performances. In the InAs/InAsSbP system grown by Liquid Phase Epitaxy,it is found that the lattice mismatch between InAsSbP and InAs is not the smaller the better,but there is an appropriate value,which is about 0.20%. When the lattice mismatch deviates from this value,the surface morphology of the material deteriorates,this leads to the increase of the dark current of the detector. The detector architecture with the appropriate lattice mismatch was obtained by adjusting the growth parameters such as the mole fraction of the antimony,phosphorus and arsenic in liquid composition and the growth temperature. Finally,the infrared detector made from the device material with the appropriate lattice mismatch was fabricated,and its room-temperature detectivity is comparable to that of international commercial InAs photodetectors.

    References

    [1] L Flannigan, L Yoell, C Q Xu. Mid-wave and long-wave infrared transmitters and detectors for optical satellite communications-a review. Journal of Optics, 24, 043002(2022).

    [2] Y T Cao, G Wang, D G Yan et al. Two algorithms for the detection and tracking of moving vehicle targets in aerial infrared image sequences. Remote Sensing, 8, 28-28(2015).

    [3] M Schubert, L Bttcher, E Gamper et al. Detectability of space debris objects in the infrared spectrum. Acta Astronautica, 195, 41-51(2022).

    [4] L Zhu, Z Deng, J Huang et al. Low frequency noise-dark current correlations in HgCdTe infrared photodetectors. Optics Express, 28, 23660-23669(2020).

    [5] R K Bhan, V Dhar. Recent infrared detector technologies, applications, trends and development of HgCdTe based cooled infrared focal plane arrays and their characterization. Opto-Electronics Review, 27, 174-193(2019).

    [6] S Maimon, G W Wicks. nBn detector, an infrared detector with reduced dark current and higher operating temperature. Applied Physics Letters, 89, 4429(2006).

    [7] X Du, G R Savich, B T Marozas et al. Suppression of lateral diffusion and surface leakage currents in nBn photodetectors using an inverted design. Journal of Electronic Materials, 47, 1038-1044(2018).

    [8] X Du, B T Marozas, G R Savich et al. Defect-related surface currents in InAs-based nBn infrared detectors. Journal of Applied Physics, 123, 214504-1-214504-5(2018).

    [9] G R Deng, W Y Yang, P Zhao et al. High operating temperature InAsSb-based mid-infrared focal plane array with a band-aligned compound barrier. Applied Physics Letters, 116, 031104(2020).

    [10] G R Deng, W Y Yang, X X Gong et al. High-performance uncooled InAsSb-based pCBn mid-infrared photodetectors. Infrared Physics & Technology, 105, 103260(2020).

    [11] J C Tong, L Tobing, S P Qiu et al. Room temperature plasmon-enhanced InAs0.91Sb0.09-based heterojunction n-i-p mid-wave infrared photodetector. Applied Physics Letters, 113, 011110.1-011110.5(2018).

    [12] J C Tong, L Tobing, L Qian et al. InAs0.9Sb0.1-based hetero p-i-n structure grown on GaSb with high mid-infrared photodetection performance at room temperature. Applied Physics Letters, 53, 13010-13017(2018).

    [13] F Suo, J C Tong, L Qian et al. Study of dark current in mid-infrared InAsSb-based hetero n-i-p photodiode. Journal of Physics D-Applied Physics, 51, 275102(2018).

    [14] D Z Ting, A Soibel, A Khoshakhlagh et al. Mid-wavelength high operating temperature barrier infrared detector and focal plane array. Applied Physics Letters, 113, 021101(2018).

    [15] A Soibel, D Z Ting, S B Rafol et al. Mid-wavelength infrared InAsSb/InAs nBn detectors and FPAs with very low dark current density. Applied Physics Letters, 114, 161103(2019).

    [16] H Y Lin, Z J Zhou, H Xie et al. High-performance room-temperature extended-wavelength InAs-based middle-wavelength infrared photodetector. Physica Status Solidi (A)- Applications and Materials Science, 218, 2100281(2021).

    [17] A Krier, W Suleiman et al. Uncooled photodetectors for the 3–5 μm spectral range based on III–V heterojunctions. Applied Physics Letters, 89, 083512(2006).

    [18] X Marcadet, A Rakovska, I Prevot et al. MBE growth of room-temperature InAsSb mid-infrared detectors. Journal of Crystal Growth, 227, 609-613(2001).

    [19] S Saha, D T Cassidy, D A Thompson. Investigation of cross-hatch in In0.3Ga0.7As pseudo-substrates. Journal of Applied Physic, 113, 49-52(2013).

    [20] Teledyne Judson. J12 series InAs detector. http://www.teledynejudson.com/products/indium-arsenide-detectors)

    [21] P Hamamatsu. 10090-01, InAs Detector. https://www.hamamatsu.com/eu/en/product/type/P10090-01/index.html)

    Ze-Zhong CHEN, Yong-Fei DUAN, Hong-Yu LIN, Zhen-Yu ZHANG, Hao XIE, Yan SUN, Shu-Hong HU, Ning DAI. Liquid Phase Epitaxy (LPE) growth of the room-temperature InAs-based mid-infrared photodetector[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2023, 42(3): 306
    Download Citation