Author Affiliations
1Key Laboratory of Infrared System Detection & Imaging Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China;2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China3National Satellite Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Imaging coordinate system and relationship among geometric parameters of MAPI image matrix
Fig. 2. Relationship between viewing angle θ and pixel position
Fig. 3. Relationship among phase function, polarized phase function, and scattering angle. (a) Relationship between phase function and scattering angle; (b) relationship between polarized phase function and scattering angle
Fig. 4. Flow chart of on-orbit polarization calibration algorithm
Fig. 5. Distribution of polarization degree of optical lens in image matrix
Fig. 6. Variation in polarization degree of optical lens with pixel position
Fig. 7. Distribution of low frequency relative transmittance of optical lens in image matrix
Fig. 8. Variation in low frequency relative transmittance of optical lens with pixel position
Fig. 9. Comparison between on-orbit polarization calibration results and laboratory polarization calibration results. (a) Central field; (b) margin field
Fig. 10. Uncertainty of polarizer channel 1. (a) u(Lr1p) varies with degree of polarization; (b) u(Lr1ε) varies with degree of polarization
Fig. 11. Uncertainty of polarizer channel 2. (a) u(Lr2p) varies with degree of polarization; (b) u(Lr2ε) varies with degree of polarization
Fig. 12. Uncertainty of polarizer channel 3. (a) u(Lr3p) varies with degree of polarization; (b) u(Lr3ε) varies with degree of polarization
Channel | Laboratory polarization calibration result | Annual average value in 2016 | Relative error δin 2016 /% | Annual average value in 2017 | Relative error δin 2017 /% | Annual average value in 2018 | Relative error δin 2018 /% |
---|
565 nm, channel 1 | 1.0266 | 1.0145 | 1.17 | 1.0197 | 0.67 | 1.0162 | 1.01 | 565 nm, channel 3 | 1.0493 | 1.0371 | 1.16 | 1.0568 | 0.71 | 1.0381 | 1.06 | 670 nm, channel 1 | 1.0105 | 0.9752 | 3.49 | 0.9851 | 2.51 | 0.9772 | 3.29 | 670 nm, channel 3 | 1.0060 | 0.9528 | 5.28 | 0.9772 | 2.86 | 0.9543 | 5.13 | 865 nm, channel 1 | 1.0263 | 0.9871 | 3.81 | 0.9960 | 2.95 | 0.9845 | 4.07 | 865 nm, channel 3 | 0.9833 | 0.9624 | 2.12 | 0.9693 | 1.42 | 0.9529 | 3.09 |
|
Table 1. Change of average relative transmittance of filter-polarizer combination in three years
Region | a5 | a4 | a3 | a2 | a1 | a0 |
---|
Upper left diagonal of image matrix | 9.77×10-12 | -4.11×10-9 | 5.70×10-7 | 2.81×10-5 | 8.38×10-4 | 3.94×10-3 | Upper right diagonal of image matrix | 4.56×10-12 | -1.96×10-9 | 2.56×10-7 | 6.23×10-6 | 4.77×10-6 | 1.31×10-3 |
|
Table 2. Fitting curve parameters of polarization degree of optical lens
Region | b5 | b4 | b3 | b2 | b1 | b0 |
---|
Upper left diagonal of image matrix | 5.18×10-12 | -2.59×10-9 | 4.60×10-7 | -3.66×10-5 | 7.54×10-4 | 0.97 | Upper right diagonal of image matrix | -1.15×10-11 | 4.96×10-9 | 7.57×10-7 | 4.54×10-6 | 1.13×10-3 | 0.97 |
|
Table 3. Fitting curve parameters of low frequency relative transmittance of optical lens
Position | Polarization response matrix |
---|
Central field of view | | Upper left field of view of image matrix | | Upper right field of view of image matrix | |
|
Table 4. Polarization response matrix