• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 40, Issue 19, 1911001 (2020)
Yipeng Zhang1、2、*, Xiuqing Hu3、**, Dekui Yin1、***, and Mingjian Gu1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Infrared System Detection & Imaging Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China;
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3National Satellite Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202040.1911001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yipeng Zhang, Xiuqing Hu, Dekui Yin, Mingjian Gu. Full Image On-Orbit Polarization Calibration Method of Multi-Angle Polarization Imager[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(19): 1911001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Imaging coordinate system and relationship among geometric parameters of MAPI image matrix
    Fig. 1. Imaging coordinate system and relationship among geometric parameters of MAPI image matrix
    Relationship between viewing angle θ and pixel position
    Fig. 2. Relationship between viewing angle θ and pixel position
    Relationship among phase function, polarized phase function, and scattering angle. (a) Relationship between phase function and scattering angle; (b) relationship between polarized phase function and scattering angle
    Fig. 3. Relationship among phase function, polarized phase function, and scattering angle. (a) Relationship between phase function and scattering angle; (b) relationship between polarized phase function and scattering angle
    Flow chart of on-orbit polarization calibration algorithm
    Fig. 4. Flow chart of on-orbit polarization calibration algorithm
    Distribution of polarization degree of optical lens in image matrix
    Fig. 5. Distribution of polarization degree of optical lens in image matrix
    Variation in polarization degree of optical lens with pixel position
    Fig. 6. Variation in polarization degree of optical lens with pixel position
    Distribution of low frequency relative transmittance of optical lens in image matrix
    Fig. 7. Distribution of low frequency relative transmittance of optical lens in image matrix
    Variation in low frequency relative transmittance of optical lens with pixel position
    Fig. 8. Variation in low frequency relative transmittance of optical lens with pixel position
    Comparison between on-orbit polarization calibration results and laboratory polarization calibration results. (a) Central field; (b) margin field
    Fig. 9. Comparison between on-orbit polarization calibration results and laboratory polarization calibration results. (a) Central field; (b) margin field
    Uncertainty of polarizer channel 1. (a) u(Lr1p) varies with degree of polarization; (b) u(Lr1ε) varies with degree of polarization
    Fig. 10. Uncertainty of polarizer channel 1. (a) u(Lr1p) varies with degree of polarization; (b) u(Lr1ε) varies with degree of polarization
    Uncertainty of polarizer channel 2. (a) u(Lr2p) varies with degree of polarization; (b) u(Lr2ε) varies with degree of polarization
    Fig. 11. Uncertainty of polarizer channel 2. (a) u(Lr2p) varies with degree of polarization; (b) u(Lr2ε) varies with degree of polarization
    Uncertainty of polarizer channel 3. (a) u(Lr3p) varies with degree of polarization; (b) u(Lr3ε) varies with degree of polarization
    Fig. 12. Uncertainty of polarizer channel 3. (a) u(Lr3p) varies with degree of polarization; (b) u(Lr3ε) varies with degree of polarization
    ChannelLaboratory polarization calibration resultAnnual average value in 2016Relative error δin 2016 /%Annual average value in 2017Relative error δin 2017 /%Annual average value in 2018Relative error δin 2018 /%
    565 nm, channel 11.02661.01451.171.01970.671.01621.01
    565 nm, channel 31.04931.03711.161.05680.711.03811.06
    670 nm, channel 11.01050.97523.490.98512.510.97723.29
    670 nm, channel 31.00600.95285.280.97722.860.95435.13
    865 nm, channel 11.02630.98713.810.99602.950.98454.07
    865 nm, channel 30.98330.96242.120.96931.420.95293.09
    Table 1. Change of average relative transmittance of filter-polarizer combination in three years
    Regiona5a4a3a2a1a0
    Upper left diagonal of image matrix9.77×10-12-4.11×10-95.70×10-72.81×10-58.38×10-43.94×10-3
    Upper right diagonal of image matrix4.56×10-12-1.96×10-92.56×10-76.23×10-64.77×10-61.31×10-3
    Table 2. Fitting curve parameters of polarization degree of optical lens
    Regionb5b4b3b2b1b0
    Upper left diagonal of image matrix5.18×10-12-2.59×10-94.60×10-7-3.66×10-57.54×10-40.97
    Upper right diagonal of image matrix-1.15×10-114.96×10-97.57×10-74.54×10-61.13×10-30.97
    Table 3. Fitting curve parameters of low frequency relative transmittance of optical lens
    PositionPolarization response matrix
    Central field of view0.992-0.494-0.8570.9730.97101.028-0.5120.888
    Upper left field of view of image matrix0.826-0.332-0.7600.9660.96400.856-0.3440.787
    Upper right field of view of image matrix0.831-0.338-0.7620.9640.96300.861-0.3500.790
    Table 4. Polarization response matrix
    Yipeng Zhang, Xiuqing Hu, Dekui Yin, Mingjian Gu. Full Image On-Orbit Polarization Calibration Method of Multi-Angle Polarization Imager[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(19): 1911001
    Download Citation