• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 51, Issue 7, 0701001 (2024)
Zijuan Wei1, Xize Gao1, Xiangyu Meng1, Zhengyan Li1、4、*, Qingbin Zhang2、4, Pengfei Lan2、**, and Peixiang Lu3、4、***
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Optical and Electronic Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China
  • 2School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China
  • 3Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China
  • 4Optics Valley Laboratory, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL231490 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zijuan Wei, Xize Gao, Xiangyu Meng, Zhengyan Li, Qingbin Zhang, Pengfei Lan, Peixiang Lu. High Harmonic Extreme Ultraviolet Light Source with High Repetition Rate and Power[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2024, 51(7): 0701001 Copy Citation Text show less
    HHG with highest average power generated by fiber laser with 1 MHz repetition rate[26]. (a) Experimental device of high power HHG; (b) high harmonic spectrum generated using krypton gas nozzle and corresponding average power of each order harmonic
    Fig. 1. HHG with highest average power generated by fiber laser with 1 MHz repetition rate[26]. (a) Experimental device of high power HHG; (b) high harmonic spectrum generated using krypton gas nozzle and corresponding average power of each order harmonic
    Water window HHG generated by high-repetition-rate thulium-doped fiber laser[47]. (a) HHG experimental setup; (b) experimentally collected HHG spectrum
    Fig. 2. Water window HHG generated by high-repetition-rate thulium-doped fiber laser[47]. (a) HHG experimental setup; (b) experimentally collected HHG spectrum
    Distribution of repetition rate, monopulse energy, photon energy, and average power of HHG generated by most advanced fiber laser driving [23-24, 26-27,29-30,32-37,39-40,42,44,47,50,54]
    Fig. 3. Distribution of repetition rate, monopulse energy, photon energy, and average power of HHG generated by most advanced fiber laser driving [23-24, 26-27,29-30,32-37,39-40,42,44,47,50,54]
    Phase matching regions. (a) Minimum ionization degree (dash line) and maximum ionization degree (solid line) satisfying phase matching in Kr, Ar, and Ne gases versus photon energy driven by pump light with different wavelengths (λ) and pulse widths (τ); (b) theoretically predicted EPMmax in Ar, Ne, and He gases versus pump laser wavelength; (c) EPMmax in Ar, Ne, and He gases versus pump laser pulse width driven by 1030 nm pump light
    Fig. 4. Phase matching regions. (a) Minimum ionization degree (dash line) and maximum ionization degree (solid line) satisfying phase matching in Kr, Ar, and Ne gases versus photon energy driven by pump light with different wavelengths (λ) and pulse widths (τ); (b) theoretically predicted EPMmax in Ar, Ne, and He gases versus pump laser wavelength; (c) EPMmax in Ar, Ne, and He gases versus pump laser pulse width driven by 1030 nm pump light
    Influence of self-absorption. (a) Variation of absorption length of HHG with gas pressure (pump laser wavelength of 1030 nm); (b) Sq/Sqmax versus Lmed/Labs under different Lcoh/Labs
    Fig. 5. Influence of self-absorption. (a) Variation of absorption length of HHG with gas pressure (pump laser wavelength of 1030 nm); (b) Sq/Sqmax versus Lmed/Labs under different Lcoh/Labs
    Sq/Sqmax and Lcoh versus gas pressure. (a) H25; (b) H33
    Fig. 6. Sq/Sqmax and Lcoh versus gas pressure. (a) H25; (b) H33
    Lcoh (dash line) and Sq/Sqmax (solid line) of HHG with wavelength of 13.5 nm generated in Ne medium versus gas pressure after key parameters is adjusted according to scaling law. (a) w0=37.5 μm,Lmed=150 μm; (b) w0=375.0 μm,Lmed=15 μm
    Fig. 7. Lcoh (dash line) and Sq/Sqmax (solid line) of HHG with wavelength of 13.5 nm generated in Ne medium versus gas pressure after key parameters is adjusted according to scaling law. (a) w0=37.5 μm,Lmed=150 μm; (b) w0=375.0 μm,Lmed=15 μm
    Different modes of coherent diffraction imaging. (a) Traditional CDI; (b) FTH; (c) ptychographic CDI
    Fig. 8. Different modes of coherent diffraction imaging. (a) Traditional CDI; (b) FTH; (c) ptychographic CDI
    Schematic of phase retrieval algorithm
    Fig. 9. Schematic of phase retrieval algorithm
    Imaging examples using HHG ptychography. (a) Sample reconstruction image obtained by ptychography using HHG for the first time[104]; (b) imaging result of mouse hippocampal neuron based on ptychography[107]
    Fig. 10. Imaging examples using HHG ptychography. (a) Sample reconstruction image obtained by ptychography using HHG for the first time[104]; (b) imaging result of mouse hippocampal neuron based on ptychography[107]
    Three-dimensional structural profiles measured by OCT[114]. (a) Depth and lateral information; (b) depth information
    Fig. 11. Three-dimensional structural profiles measured by OCT[114]. (a) Depth and lateral information; (b) depth information
    Driving laser parameterGas targetHHG parameterRef.
    Wavelength /nmAverage power /W

    Repetition

    rate /kHz

    Pulse energy /μJ

    Pulse

    width /

    fs

    Target type

    Gas

    type

    Photon

    energy

    range /eV

    Target

    photon

    energy /eV

    Average

    power /

    μW

    Flux /(photon/s)
    103010100100270JetAr15‒3823
    28100028Xe13‒18
    103010100100500CellXe13‒2313‒234.5×101228
    10305.410054170JetAr18‒4030.10.24.5×101029
    1030105020051JetKr25‒5730
    1030295058065JetKr19‒6225.33.27.9×101132
    1030405080036

    Hollow

    fiber

    50‒7068.61.51.4×101133
    10308060013029JetXe25‒3830.11433×101334
    Kr27‒4032.5428×1012
    1030255050035JetAr57‒7166.20.87.8×101027
    515111209285JetKr21‒3121.78322.4×101435
    Ar26.7721.7×1013
    34751000598CellXe-Ar10.712507.3×101436
    103050166300135JetAr16‒5239.70.579×101037
    5151911413018‒3621.7802.3×1013
    3439.55714018‒33181.9×1036.6×1014
    25721213524‒3424.138×1011
    5155110005118.6JetKr22‒3126.51.29×1043×101526
    103030754007JetAr70‒120920.17×10939
    Ne70‒160920.043×109
    10306360010535JetAr66‒84713.43×101140
    Ne75‒150930.075×109
    9184.5180256.6JetNe100‒2001252.6×10-31.3×10825
    8001010010040

    Hollow

    fiber

    Ar30‒50388.51.4×101242
    1030351003507.8JetNe120‒2001200.063.1×10944
    He150‒3501809×10-33×108
    19104498450100

    Hollow

    fiber

    He200‒3003001.3×10-42.8×10647
    10302020800135JetXe13‒20181×10-33.5×10850
    10307610700731JetXe21‒3027.751.11.14×101354
    Table 1. Main parameters of generating high-repetition-rate HHG experiment generated by fiber laser driving
    ParameterLoose focusingTight focusing
    Gas densityρς2ρ
    Medium lengthLmedLmed/ς2
    Medium diameterdmeddmed/ς
    Driving laser energyEinEin/ς2
    Harmonic energyEhEh/ς2
    Conversion efficiencyГhГh
    Table 2. Scaling laws of important parameters between loose and tight focusing regimes[80-82]
    Zijuan Wei, Xize Gao, Xiangyu Meng, Zhengyan Li, Qingbin Zhang, Pengfei Lan, Peixiang Lu. High Harmonic Extreme Ultraviolet Light Source with High Repetition Rate and Power[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2024, 51(7): 0701001
    Download Citation