Author Affiliations
School of Optical and Electronic Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Flow chart of imaging
Fig. 2. Fringe projection picture and original phase image. (a) Fringe projection picture of teeth;(b) original phase image
Fig. 3. Results of twice reconstruction. (a) Phase image of first time reconstruction; (b) phase image of second time reconstruction
Fig. 4. Results of twice reconstruction after transposition. (a) Phase image of third time reconstruction; (b) phase image of forth time reconstruction
Fig. 5. Final results. (a) Top view of final result; (b) 3D image of final result
Fig. 6. Results of least square method. (a) Top view rebulided by least square method; (b) 3D image rebulided by least square method
Fig. 7. Results of weighted least square method. (a) Top view rebulided by weighted least square method; (b) 3D image rebulided by weighted least square method
Fig. 8. Wrapped phase image and rewrapped phase image of regional judgement. (a) Wrapped phase image; (b) rewrapped phase image of regional judgement
Fig. 9. Wrapped phase image and rewrapped phase image of least square method. (a) Wrapped phase image; (b) rewrapped phase image of least square method
Fig. 10. Wrapped phase image and rewrapped phase image of weighted least square method. (a) Wrapped phase image; (b) rewrapped phase image of weighted least square method
Fig. 11. First case. (a) Fringe projection picture; (b) rebuilded 3D image
Fig. 12. Second case. (a) Fringe projection picture; (b) rebuilded 3D image
Fig. 13. Third case. (a) Fringe projection picture; (b) rebuilded 3D image
Comparison | PhaseUnwrappingAlgorithm | LeastSquareMethod | WeightedLeastSquare Method |
---|
Averagevalueof error | 0.005 | 1.7555 | 2.0238 | Standarddeviationof error | 0.1765 | 2.9331 | 3.1703 |
|
Table 1. Error average value and error standard deviation of error matrix