• High Power Laser and Particle Beams
  • Vol. 34, Issue 12, 122003 (2022)
Qiuyue Xu1, Jiaxin Zhou2, Lianqiang Shan1、*, Chao Tian1, Zuhua Yang1, Tiankui Zhang1, Weiwu Wang1, Jian Teng1, Zhigang Deng1, Zongqiang Yuan1, Feng Zhang1, Wei Qi1, Dongxiao Liu1, Quanping Fan1, Lai Wei1, Weimin Zhou1, and Yuqiu Gu1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Science and Technology on Plasma Physics Laboratory, Laser Fusion Research Center, CAEP, Mianyang 621900, China
  • 2School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.220199 Cite this Article
    Qiuyue Xu, Jiaxin Zhou, Lianqiang Shan, Chao Tian, Zuhua Yang, Tiankui Zhang, Weiwu Wang, Jian Teng, Zhigang Deng, Zongqiang Yuan, Feng Zhang, Wei Qi, Dongxiao Liu, Quanping Fan, Lai Wei, Weimin Zhou, Yuqiu Gu. Optimized simulation of D3He proton source for exploding pusher target[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34(12): 122003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagram of D3He proton radiography
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of D3He proton radiography
    Streamline diagram of exploding pusher target, time-integrated fusion proton yield (blue line) and laser time profile (black line)
    Fig. 2. Streamline diagram of exploding pusher target, time-integrated fusion proton yield (blue line) and laser time profile (black line)
    Proton yield and D3He outer radius at peak compression (Rp) versus initial radius
    Fig. 3. Proton yield and D3He outer radius at peak compression (Rp) versus initial radius
    Proton yield and ion temperature versus laser energy
    Fig. 4. Proton yield and ion temperature versus laser energy
    Proton yield and ion temperature versus gas pressure
    Fig. 5. Proton yield and ion temperature versus gas pressure
    Ion mean free path and Knudsen number versus gas pressure
    Fig. 6. Ion mean free path and Knudsen number versus gas pressure
    Proton yield and ion temperature versus thickness of SiO2
    Fig. 7. Proton yield and ion temperature versus thickness of SiO2
    Optimum thickness of SiO2 shell and proton yield versus laser energy
    Fig. 8. Optimum thickness of SiO2 shell and proton yield versus laser energy
    Laser intensity distribution on the surface of exploding pusher target
    Fig. 9. Laser intensity distribution on the surface of exploding pusher target
    Qiuyue Xu, Jiaxin Zhou, Lianqiang Shan, Chao Tian, Zuhua Yang, Tiankui Zhang, Weiwu Wang, Jian Teng, Zhigang Deng, Zongqiang Yuan, Feng Zhang, Wei Qi, Dongxiao Liu, Quanping Fan, Lai Wei, Weimin Zhou, Yuqiu Gu. Optimized simulation of D3He proton source for exploding pusher target[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34(12): 122003
    Download Citation