• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 38, Issue 5, 0514003 (2018)
Sen Zhang1、2, Junwei Zhang1, Jie Mu1, Yi Zhou1、*, Xiao Wang1, Jingqin Su1, and Dongxia Hu1
Author Affiliations
  • 1 College of Mechanical Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
  • 1 Research Center of Laser Fusion, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang, Sichuan 621900, China
  • 2 Research Center of Laser Fusion, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang, Sichuan 621900, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201838.0514003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Sen Zhang, Junwei Zhang, Jie Mu, Yi Zhou, Xiao Wang, Jingqin Su, Dongxia Hu. Dynamical Phase Error Control and Bandwidth Analysis for Coherent Beam Combination Based on Stochastic Parallel Gradient Descent Algorithm[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(5): 0514003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of laser beam array
    Fig. 1. Schematic of laser beam array
    Schematic for coherent beam combination of high-energy short-pulse laser based on SPGD algorithm
    Fig. 2. Schematic for coherent beam combination of high-energy short-pulse laser based on SPGD algorithm
    Convergence curves for different performance evaluation functions
    Fig. 3. Convergence curves for different performance evaluation functions
    Comparison of adaptive gain and constant gain. (a) Algorithm convergence curves; (b) adaptive gain variation curve
    Fig. 4. Comparison of adaptive gain and constant gain. (a) Algorithm convergence curves; (b) adaptive gain variation curve
    Schematic of coherent beam combination for two short laser pulses
    Fig. 5. Schematic of coherent beam combination for two short laser pulses
    Variation curves of peak intensity of far-field focal spot for open-loop and closed-loop states
    Fig. 6. Variation curves of peak intensity of far-field focal spot for open-loop and closed-loop states
    Coherent beam combination with external vibration conditions. (a) 10 Hz; (b) 15 Hz; (c) 20 Hz; (d) 25 Hz
    Fig. 7. Coherent beam combination with external vibration conditions. (a) 10 Hz; (b) 15 Hz; (c) 20 Hz; (d) 25 Hz
    Convergence curves for static phase error correction in different laser arrays by SPGD algorithm
    Fig. 8. Convergence curves for static phase error correction in different laser arrays by SPGD algorithm
    Convergence curves for dynamic phase error correction in four-beam and nine-beam laser arrays by SPGD algorithm for 1 s. (a) δ=0.2; (b) δ=0.4; (c) δ=0.8
    Fig. 9. Convergence curves for dynamic phase error correction in four-beam and nine-beam laser arrays by SPGD algorithm for 1 s. (a) δ=0.2; (b) δ=0.4; (c) δ=0.8
    Relationship between coherent combining effect and dynamic phase noise performance under different algorithm iteration rates. (a) Iteration rate is 2 kHz; (b) iteration rate is 5 kHz
    Fig. 10. Relationship between coherent combining effect and dynamic phase noise performance under different algorithm iteration rates. (a) Iteration rate is 2 kHz; (b) iteration rate is 5 kHz
    Relationship between coherent combining effect and dynamic phase noise for two beams and nine beams. (a) Two beams; (b) nine beams
    Fig. 11. Relationship between coherent combining effect and dynamic phase noise for two beams and nine beams. (a) Two beams; (b) nine beams
    Iteration rate /kHzEffective control bandwidth /Hz
    δ=0.4δ=0.6δ=0.8δ=1.0
    258431319388
    51697862482280
    Table 1. Relationship between control bandwidth and iteration rate for SPGD algorithm
    Sen Zhang, Junwei Zhang, Jie Mu, Yi Zhou, Xiao Wang, Jingqin Su, Dongxia Hu. Dynamical Phase Error Control and Bandwidth Analysis for Coherent Beam Combination Based on Stochastic Parallel Gradient Descent Algorithm[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(5): 0514003
    Download Citation