Author Affiliations
1Kansai Photon Science Institute, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Kyoto619-0215, Japan2Center for Relativistic Laser Science, Institute for Basic Science, Gwangju61005, Republic of Korea3Advanced Photonics Research Institute, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju61005, Republic of Korea4Department of Physics and Photon Science, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju61005, Republic of Korea5Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, 01328Dresden, Germany6Technische Universität Dresden, 01062Dresden, Germanyshow less
Fig. 1. Layout and picture of the plasma mirror system at J-KAREN-P. (a) Layout of the PM setup. OAP, off-axis parabolic mirrors; PS, periscope; NF, near-field image camera; FF, far-field image camera; FPM, focus monitor on the PM; IS, integrating sphere and spectrometer; TOCC, third-order cross-correlator; SRSI, self-referenced spectral interferometry; FM, focus monitor. (b) PM chamber. (c) Periscope pair. (d) OAP and stage. (e) Substrate of single PM and damage pattern.
Fig. 2. Reflectivity of the plasma mirror system. The vertical axis shows the reflectivity estimated from the energy acquired before and after the PM system. The horizontal axis shows the fluence and the intensity of the PM, whose value was estimated by measuring the spot size on the PM. The inset image shows spots on the PM (500 J/cm2) obtained with the focus monitor on the PM (FPM; Figure 1(a)).
Fig. 3. (a) Shot-to-shot energy variation during 40 shots without (9.0 ± 0.31 J) and with (5.9 ± 0.26 J) the PM. (b) Shot-to-shot energy variation during 10 shots at each fluence (0.1, 0.5, 2.5, 7.5 and 50 kJ/cm2), without the PM and before the PM for the same shots. The circles and triangles represent energy after the PM. Energy before the PM is shown with diamonds.
Fig. 4. Temporal contrast with (red line) and without (blue line) the PM. The dotted line is the temporal contrast estimated using the reflectance of the PM (65%) and AR coating (0.8%). The inset figure is an enlarged plot showing detail around the peak of the pulse. From the data points with and without the PM, the trigger time range for the PM is from –0.9 to –0.3 ps.
Fig. 5. One hundred shots average of pulse duration measurement from the self-referenced spectral interferometer: (a) linear scale; (b) log scale. The error bars correspond to statistical variations. The arrow in (b) shows the pre-pulse generated when using the PM.
Fig. 6. Shot-to-shot fluctuation of pulse duration (FWHM): without the PM, 47 ± 1.4 fs; with the PM irradiated with a fluence of 500 J/cm2, 45 ± 1.0 fs.
Fig. 7. The spectrum of 10 shots average with and without the PM. The fluence of PM irradiation is 500 J/cm2. The error bars correspond to standard deviations of statistical variations.
Fig. 8. Spatial profiles: (a) NF image; (b) FF image. The laser fluence on the PM is written above.
Fig. 9. Focus spot images from the alignment laser (<μJ) after focusing by the OAP (F/1.3), (a) without (X: 1.57 μm, Y: 1.65 μm) and (b) with the PM system (X: 1.66 μm, Y: 1.59 μm), with FWHM values given. The focused intensity is calculated as 100 TW of the integrated value of all signals. Note that (b) is the focused spot from a highly reflective coated part of the PM substrate, rather than an activated PM.
Fig. 10. Pointing stability of the alignment laser (<μJ) with the OAP (F/1.3) at the target position: (a) horizontal axis; (b) vertical axis. The standard deviations are X: 1.11 μrad, Y: 1.22 μrad with the PM and X: 1.99 μrad, Y: 2.07 μrad without the PM. Note that the PM dataset is from a highly reflective coated part of the PM substrate, rather than an activated PM.
| | | Maximum | Temporal | |
---|
| Laser power | | reflectivity of | contrast | |
---|
Laser name or laser facility | (TW) | PM system design | PM system (%) | enhancement | References |
---|
Hercules | 300 | Double | 50 | 105 | [39] | BELLA Petawatt Laser | 1000 | Single (VHS tape) | 80 | | [40] | Scarlet | 400 | Single (liquid crystal) | 75 | 350 | [28] | Advanced Laser Light Source | 200 | Double | 55 | 104 | [41] | Astra-Gemini | 500 | Double | 65 | 104 | [42,43] | Salle Jaune | 100 | Double | 50 | 104 | [44] | UHI100 | 100 | Double | 50 | 104 | [45] | JETI | 10 | Single | 80 | 103 | [46] | ATLAS | 300 | Double | 40 | 103–104 | [47] | Max-Born-Institute | 35 | Double | 60 | 104 | [48,49] | DRACO | 150 (1000) | Single | 90 (85) | 102–103 | [50,51] | ARCTURUS | 100 | Single | 80 | 102 | [52] | POLARIS | 170 | Single | | 600 | [53] | Lund Laser Center | 10 | Double | 40 | 102 | [54,55] | Laboratory for Laser Plasmas | 200 | Single | 70 | 102 | [56] | CoReLS 4-PW laser | 4000 | Double | 70 | 7×106 | [57] | T6-laser | 10 | Single | 70 | 104 | [58] | J-KAREN-P | 200 | Single | 85 | 102 | This work |
|
Table 1. Performance and design of PM systems in laser facilities around the world.
| Energy on | Temporal contrast | Pulse duration | Spot size | Pointing | Peak intensity |
---|
| target (J) | at –10 ps | FWHM (fs) | FWHM (μm) | (μrad, RMS) | (W/cm2) |
---|
Without PM | 9.0 ± 0.31 | 10–7 | 47 ± 1.4 | X: 1.57 | X: 1.11 | (3.8 ± 0.6) × 1021 | | | | | Y: 1.65 | Y: 1.22 | | PM | 5.9 ± 0.26 | 10–9 | 45 ± 1.0 | X: 1.66 | X: 1.99 | (2.3 ± 0.3) × 1021 | (0.5 kJ/cm2) | (RPM ≃ 65%) | | | Y: 1.59 | Y: 2.07 | | PM | 7.0 ± 0.34 | | | X: 1.66 | X: 1.99 | (2.9 ± 0.4) × 1021 | (100 kJ/cm2) | (RPM ≃ 83%) | | | Y: 1.59 | Y: 2.07 | |
|
Table 2. Summary of the characteristics of the PM system in J-KAREN-P. Note that the focus spot size and pointing stability are measured with alignment mode laser (<μJ). Note that the PM dataset is from a highly reflective coated part of the PM substrate, rather than an activated PM. The peak intensities are calculated from the on-target energy, pulse duration and focused intensity, respectively.